Representative Town Meeting Regular Meeting Materials (linked)
agenda center agenda
| Board/Commission | Representative Town Meeting (RTM) |
|---|---|
| Meeting Date | August 03, 2020 |
| Pages | 63 |
| File Size | 2.8 MB |
| OCR Status | Searchable (OCR processed) |
| Source URL | Original |
Document Preview
Full Text (OCR Extracted)
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
A.
B.
Cc.
D.
E.
F.
G
H.
PHONE: 860-442-0553
wwwayaterfordct.org
AGENDA
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
Monday, August 3, 2020, 7:00pm — Waterford Town Hall
ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCE ACCESS ONLY
Join Zoom Meeting
httos://us02web.zoom.us/j/3171180827
Meeting ID: 317 118 0827
One tap mobile
+13126266799, ,3171180827# US (Chicago)
+16465588656,,3171180827# US (New York)
Dial by your location
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
Meeting ID: 317 118 0827
Find your focal number: https://usO2web.zoom.us/u/kBHC2NreQ
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
To consider and act upon the minutes of the June 1, 2020 Regular Meeting.
Correspondence
Public Comment
Committee reports and referrals
. Appointee & Liaison updates
Transaction-of Business on the Call;
4. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Finance
for an appropriation in the amount of $11,850 from the Contingency Lit
10121-59010 to Capital Project Account 32921-55864 (Body Cameras).
2. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Finance
for an appropriation in the amount of $259,300 from the Capital and Non-
Recurring Designated Li# 20501-57639 — (Revaluation).
3. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Finance
for an appropriation in the amount of $155,287.12 from the Capital and
Non-Recurring Designated LI#-20560-57822 — (IT Learning Boards —
end of life), based upon its consistency with the Capital Improvement
Plan.
4. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Finance
for an appropriation in the amount of $439,125 from the Capital and Non-
Recurring Designated LI# 20560-57827 — (IT Virtual Desktop Main
Processor), based upon its consistency with the Capital Improvement
Plan.
5. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Finance
for an appropriation in the amount of $30,000 from the Capital and Non-
Recurring Designated Ll# 20560-57808 — (Replace DVR Security
Camera), based upon its consistency with the Capital Improvement Plan.
6. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Selectmen
to approve a request from AHEPA 250-I] Inc. of 95 Clark Lane ,
Waterford, for a five (5) year extension of their Tax Abatement agreement
to end on June 24, 2024, together with two five (5) year options thereafter.
7. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Finance,
pending the outcome of its Special Meeting on July 28, 2020, for an
appropriation in the amount of $150,000 from the FY21 Capital and Non-
Recurring Designated LI#20537-57854 and be moved into account
20537-57781, for the Waterford Beach Park Improvements.
8. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Finance
for an appropriation in the amount of $100,000 from the Capital and Non-
Recurring Designated Li# 20560-57842 — (School Security), based
upon its consistency with the Capital Improvement Plan.
Il. New Business
J. Adjournment
PHONE: 860-442-0553
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
wiviwaterfordcL arg
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
MINUTES
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING
ZOOM Access Only — Waterford Town Hall
Regular Meeting
June i, 2020
The June 1, 2020, Moderator Thomas Dembek called the Regular Meeting of the Representative Bun
Meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL .
PRESENT: Greg Attanasio, Michael Bono, JeJennifer Bracciale, April Cairns, Timothy Condon, Thomas J.
Dembek, Susan Driscoll, Steven Elci, Timothy Fioravanti, Mirlam Furey-Wagner, Nick Gauthier, Paul
Goldstein, Kathleen Kohl, David Lersch, Valerie Metivier, Richard Muckle, Liam O’Leary, Theodore
Olynciw, Sally Ritchie, Michael Rocchetti (7:15 P.M.}, Danielle Steward-Gelinas, Robert Swansen, Baird
Welch-Collins.
ABSENT: Richard Morgan.
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT: First Selectman Robert Brule; Chair of the Board of Education Craig
Merriman; Chair of the Board of Finance Ronald R. Fedor.
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT: Selectwoman Jody Nazarchyk; Selectman Elizabeth Sabilia.
ALSO PRESENT: Town Clerk David L. Campo; Town Attorney Robert Avena.
AGENDA ITEM C~ May 11-14, 2020 Minutes
MOTION by Weich-Collins, seconded by Steward-Gelinas, to accept the May 11- 44, 2020, Special
Meeting Minutes.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous,
AGENDA ITEM D-CORRESPONDENCE
One item was received from Planning Director Abby Piersall entitled, “Proposed Changes to the
Waterford Code of Ordinances Chapters 2.20 and 2.58, enabling the Facilities Manager position to be
moved from the Planning Department to the Department of Public Works”.
Moderator Dembek stated issue would be discussed under New Business.
AGENDA ITEM E - PUBLIC COMMENT
None
AGENDA ITEM F - COMMITTEE REPORTS
None
AGENDA ITEM G - LIAISON REPORTS _
Thomas Dembek gave a brief update on the progress of Municipal Complex.
AGENDA ITEM H - BUSINESS ON THE CALL
CALL ITEM 1 - 13 Parkway Drive Purchase
PRESENTATION: Town Attorney Robert Avena.
MOTION by Muckle, seconded by Driscoll, to approve a recommendation from the Board of Finance for
an appropriation of $26,000 from Line Item #205-31520 — Undesignated Fund Balance based upon its
consistency with the Capital Improvement Pian, to purchase real estate located at 13 Parkway Drive.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous.”
CALL ITEM 2 -23 Old Norwich Road Acceptance
PRESENTATION: Planning Director Abby Piersail.
- MOTION by Welch-Collins, seconded by Steward-Gelinas, to approve a recommendation from the
Planning and Zoning Commission to accept a piece of land at 23 Old Norwich Road.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous.
CALL ITEM 3 — Yankee Gas Easement Over Hartford Road
PRESENTATION: Town Attorney Robert Avena.
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Muckle, to approve a recommendation from the Board of Finance to
convey a permanent gas line easement to Yankee Gas Services Company DBA Eversource Energy for
$50,000, located at 1000 Hartford Road over the presently existing temporary gas easement.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous with one member opposed, (Gauthier)
CALL ITEM 4 $1,006,000 Transfer to Undesignated Fund Balance
PRESENTATION: Director of Finance Kim Allen,
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Goldstein, to approve a recommendation from the Board of Finance
for the transfer of $1,000,000 from the Unassigned Fund Balance to the Undesignated Fund Balance of
the CNR,
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous.
NEW BUSINESS:
MOTION by Muckle, seconded by Welch Collins, to move the subject “Waterford Code of Ordinance
_review of Chapters 2.20 and 2.58” received under correspondence to the Public Works, Planning &
Development Committee. (See Attachment} —
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous.
MOTION by Muckle, seconded by Welch-Collins, to adjourn at 7:35 P.M.
VOTING (N FAVOR; Unanimous,
Respectfully Submitted,
David L. Campo, CCTC
Town Clerk
FIETEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Thomas Dembek, Moderator, Waterford Representative Town Meeting
FROM: Abby Y. Piersall, AICP, Director of Planning and Development
DATE: May 18, 2020
TITLE: Proposed Changes to the Waterford Code of Ordinances Chapters 2.20 and 2.58, enabling the Facilities
Manager position to be moved from the Planning Department to the Department of Public Works.
Since June of 2014, the Planning Department has, by ordinance, overseen maintenance for Town buitdings. In that
time, the building maintenance program has grown from providing assistance with repairs and capital planning fo
planning and managing major repairs and renovations, handling routine maintenance calls, and developing ait asset
management program. In January of 2020, the Town replaced the part-time Facilities Coordinator position with a
fall-time Facilities Manager. This personne! change has further increased the Town's capacity to plan for and
perform appropriate building maintenance,
Creating the full-time Facilities Manager position was accomplished with the understanding that the nature of the
work was most closely aligned with the Public Works Department. Moving the Facilities Manager to DPW would
provide the position with more resources for tools, labor, and technical support. The move would also enable the
Plauning Department to direct more resources to economic development activities. Long-range facilities planning
would still be done in partnership avith the Planning Director, but would be under the supervision of the DPW
Director.
,
The Planning Director, Public Works Director, and Town Attorney worked together to draft amendments to sections
2.20 and 2.58 of the Waterford Code of Ordinances to enable the position to move to DPW. The proposed
amendments are respectfully submitted for the RTM’s consideration and to forward to the appropriate committee for
review.
x
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Thomas Dembek, Moderator, Waterford Representative Town Meeting
FROM: Abby Y. Piersall, AICP, Director of Planning and Development
DATE: July 21, 2020
TITLE: Proposed Changes to the Waterford Code of Ordinances Chapter 12.08 Concerning the
possession and drinking of alcoholic beverages in town parks and recreation areas.
This request is to consider the potential to allow the possession or drinking of alcoholic beverages at
recreational facilities during special events approved by the Board of Selectmen. Alcohol is currently
prohibited at Town facilities. This change would enable events such as concerts, fundraisers, or festivals
to include the sale and consumption of beer or wine. The change would not enable possession of alcohol
at school properties or on beaches. :
Changing this Ordinance is a key step in reducing restrictions on the range of events that can be held on
town properties. The addition of carefully planned service of wine or beer can help broaden participation
in Waterford events and draw new attractions to Town. Enabling sanctioned alcohol consumption in
public places supports ongoing efforts increase the frequency and diversity of dynamic and vibrant events
in Waterford. Events like dinners at the historic Jordan Green, summer concerts at the Waterford Beach
Park, or craft beer and wine tasting at the Farmers Market could be permitted if the Ordinance is changed.
As proposed, the change would only allow beer and wine to be available as sanctioned on a case-by-case
basis by the Board of Selectmen.
Section 12.08.040 currently reads:
The possession or drinking of alcoholic beverages in any town park and recreational area,
including Waterford Beach, is prohibited.
Proposed language for 12.08.040 is:
The possession or drinking of alcoholic beverages in any town park and/or recreational
area is prohibited, except as provided below:
A. Possession and drinking of beer and wine may be permitted at locations and times
as approved by the Board of Selectmen. In no case will the possession and drinking
of beer and wine be allowed on the sand or dunes of any beach. :
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
to
eco
MEMORANDUM
TO: Thomas Dembek, Moderator, Waterford Representative Town Meeting
FROM: Abby Y. Piersall, AICP, Director of Planning and Development
DATE: July 21, 2020
TITLE: Proposed Changes to the Waterford Code of Ordinances Chapter 15.6, Blighted Premises.
This request is to ask the Waterford Representative Town Meeting to consider the potential modifications
to the existing Blight Ordinance. The current Ordinance became effective in April of 2017. Since that
time, three individuals have held the position of Blight Enforcement Officer, and all have noted similar
concerns about certain elements of the Ordinance.
The intent of the Blight Ordinance was to provide the Town with a straightforward adininistrative tool to
address properties in poor condition. After working with the current Ordinance, several issues have arisen
that should be addressed. These include:
1, The structure and presentation of definitions and characterization of blight.
The Ordinance currently combines descriptions of blight with general definitions. These
sections should be clearly separated to eliminate confusion about what constitutes blight.
2. The process limits the ability of the Blight Enforcement Officer to effectively work with residents
who will voluntarily comply, and can unintentionally lead to very high fines,
Under the existing ordinance, fines begin to accrue from the date the Officer sends a
Notice of Blight Violation. Procedurally, the Town receives a complaint and after an
inspection to verify the blighted condition of property, sends a violation notice in
accordance with the Ordinance. Many property owners will receive the notice and call the
Officer to create a blight abatement plan. If the owners fail to fully complete the plan in
the time specified, fines are calculated from the date of the original notice.
3. The property owner being cited for blight may appeal a decision of the Blight
Enforcement Officer, but there is no mechanism in the Ordinance for the person making
the complaint to appeal.
The Blight Enforcement Officer makes a professional determination at the time
of the site inspection as to whether or not the property is blighted. Since 2017,
multiple cases have illustrated that persons making the complaint may not agree
with the Officer when a determination that blight is not present is found. Staff
suggests reviewing an option to create a committee that would set fines and
address any disagreement a complainer has with the decision of the Officer.
To remedy these issues, it is suggested that the Blight Ordinance be referred to committee for
further consideration and potential modifications, The Planning Director, Blight Enforcement
Officer, and Town Attorney are currently working on a draft of the Ordinance to present for
committee review,
David Campo
From: Mary Childs <childsmm22@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2020 1:06 PM
To: David Campo; Mary Childs
Subject: public comment for RTM
I a CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. : : q
j. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender's email address and know the 1
ee ee : es : ~ content is safe. : ee nS 4
Hello Mr. Campo, I would like to request that this message be shared as a public comment at the next meeting
and that the RTM members receive a copy of it.
To the Waterford RTM, My name is Mary Childs and I am writing to you as a parent of 4 children who live in
Waterford and as a resident of this town for a total of 37 years. I have recently sent letters to the Superintendent
of Schools and to the First Selectman and Selectwomen. As elected officials, you have a new call to accept.
While racism and actions that are meant to oppress others can be out loud, | am asking you to consider looking
into other forms of oppression. These subtle offenses are within our community and our public systems.
At your recent meeting where final budgets were decided, it was clear that the Police Department was supported
as that budget was passed with no cuts and with relatively little comment or discussion, Equally clear was the
message to the town about it's youngest residents as the Board of Education budget was significantly cut. This
cut, while substantial, was not reopened for discussion. Understand that the message this chain of events sends
is that more value is being placed on our town department that punishes by protecting and serving versus a
department that educates, supports, and elevates our community.
What is the RTM doing to work on personal biases, justice reform, systemic racism, and other difficult but
necessary areas of work? You put our money where your mouth is and I would like to know what your next
steps are. We need to challenge the status quo in our community and I suggest that instead of giving nods to
budgets based on party-line consensus or past practice, you consider the positive impact that a budget will and
will not have for our entire community that continues to be more and more diverse.
Thank you for your time. We all have work to do.
Sincerely, Mary Childs
MODERATOR’S REPORT
Representative Town Meeting
August 3, 2020
Matters Currently in Standing Committees
LEGISLATION & ADMINISTRATION
EDUCATION
Restoration/Use of the Nevin’s Cottage, RTC 08-06-18
FINANCE, WAGE & PERSONNEL
PUBLIC HEALTH, RECREATION & ENVIRONMENT
Review/Evaluate Beach Fee Pricing, RTC 04-06-20
PUBLIC PROTECTION & SAFETY
Review/Enactment of a Stipend Program for Volunteer Firefighters, RTC 10-07-19
PUBLIC WORKS, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Waterford Code of ordinance review of Chapters 2.20 and 2.58, RTC 06/01/20
ROPE
TERPORD, (27 (536
PHONE: S6f1-442-0553
wivwwaterfordctorg
July 16, 2020
Mr, Thomas Dembek, Moderator
Representative Town Meeting
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Dear Moderator Dembek:
At the meeting of the Board of Finance held, Wednesday, July 15, 2020, it was voted to recommend to
the Representative Town Meeting, an appropriation in the amount of $11,850 from the Contingency
line #10121-59010 to capital project account 32921-55864 (body cameras).
| respectfully request you place this item on the agenda of the next meeting of the Representative Town
Meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Crna tcl AC Fide,
Ronald R. Fedor, Chairman
Board of Finance
RRF:mtm
lo
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
PHONE: 860-442-0553
www.waterfordct.org
July 8, 2020
Mr. Ronald Fedor
Chairman
Board of Finance
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Police- Additional Appropriation Request
Dear Chairman Fedor,
The Board of Selectmen, at their meeting on Tuesday, July 7, 2020 voted to approve the
following request: ;
To consider and act on a request for an additional appropriation of $11,850 from the
Contingency account #10121-59010 to capital project account 32921-55864 (body cameras).
The Additional Appropriation is approved with the knowledge that 50% of the total expenditure
will be reimbursed through an approved state grant and forward onto the Board of Finance as
required.
Therefore, I respectfully request that you consider and act on this request. I have attached
pertinent back up material from the designated department.
Sincerely,
)Cot Kuh
Robert J. Brule
First Selectman
Enclosure
WATERFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT BODY CAMERA REQUEST
07/07/2020
This listing shows all items for a police body camera system for the Waterford, Connecticut Police
Department. It totals approximately $110,000.00, we have applied for and received permission for a
50% reimbursement grant from the State of Connecticut, totaling approximately $55,000.00 which will
be reimbursed when the Town has spent the money.
Required items:
1. Cameras (includes vehicle installation}
49 Body cameras, setup, chargers, batteries, etc.
Each camera has a “hot swappable” battery (new)
This price includes vehicle installation.
2. Redaction Software:
Software needed to blur faces, alter voices, etc for court and FOI.
Redaction includes domestic disputes, sex assaults, juveniles, etc.
3. Building wiring
Building wiring for charging stations and data ports,
4. Redaction Computer
Computer for above listed redaction software.
This computer went down in price since last quote request.
5. Network switch
Switch for ail of the computer logic to flow through.
Total:
Respectfully,
Brett Mahoney
Chief of Police
$91,716.00
$8,790.00
$2,197.00
$2,369.13
$4,561.08
$109,633.21
WATCH (?} GUARD
CUSTOMER: Waterford Police Department
”
My)
ATTENTION: Lt. Tim Silva
PHONE:
E-MAIL: — tsilva@waterfordct.org
4RE and VISTA Proposal
VISTA HD Cameras and Options
4RE/VISTA Price
Quote
ISSUED: 7/7/2020 10:34 AM
EXPIRATION: 7122/2020 8: 00 AM
: TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATED AT:
SALES CONTACT: Eric Varner
DIRECT: (469) 342-8940
E-MAIL; eric.varner@motorolasolutions.com
Part Number Detait Qty Direct Discount Total Price
HDW-ETH-SWT-005 VISTA HD, 4RE, Smart PoE Switch 19.00 $250.00 $0.00 $4,750.00
WatchGuard Video Technical Services| _ -_
Part Number Detail Qty Direct Discount tal Price
SVC-4RE-INS-100 Gye ver Installation, in-Car (Per Unit 49.00 $250.00 $0.00 $4,750.00
_ARE-ONG.. ARE System Setup, Configuration, Testing and , i :
SYC-4RE-ONS-400 Training (WG-TS) ? 1.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 $2,560.00
Shipping and Handling _ ee _
Part Number Detail Qty Direct Discount Total Price
Freight Shipping/Handting and Processing Charges 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.60
$142,000.00
V300 Proposal
VISTA HD Cameras and Options ee ;
Part Number Detail Qty Direct Discount Total Price
300, Body Worn Camera, 1080P, _
ViS-300-BWC-001—_WiFi/Bluetoath with Removable Battery. 49.00 $995.00 8000848, 755.00
Transfer Station fl Kit, Incl. Power & AC
Vis-300-VTS-KIT Cables, Label and Docs 6.00 $1,495.00 _ $0.00 $8,970.00 _
300. . 300, USB Dock, D306, Desktop Charge/Uptoad
VIS-300 CHG Got ___Kit Incl. Power and USB Cables - 1.00 $95.00 _$0.00 : $95.00
V300, WiFi Dock, D330, In-Vehicle
WiS-300-VEH-002 Charge/Uptoad Kit, incl, Cables and Brackets 19.00 $295.00 _ $0.00 95,605.00 :
300, Camera Alount, 44300, Magnetic w/ Quick
VIS-300-MNT-001 Release Levers 7.60 $69.00 $0.00 $483.00
7 300, Battery, Removable and Rechargable,
VIS-300-BAT-RMV 3.8V, 4180mAh 7,00 $99.00 $0.00 $693.00
VISTA HD Warranties 7
415 E. Exchange Parkway ¢ Allen, TX * 75002
Toll Free (800) 605-6734 * Main (972) 423-9777 « Fax (972) 423-9778
www. WatchGuard Video.com
Page 1 of 2
GUARD ARE/VISTA Price
WATCH Quote
Part Number Detail Qty Direct Discount Total Price
WAR-300-CAM<4ST Warranty, ¥300 1st Year (Months 1-12) 49.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Included
Evidence Library 4 Web Software and Licensing _ _ _ _
Part Number Detail Qty Direct Discount Total Price
KEY-ELSO5RV-001 kane Library 5, Web Server Site License 1.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00
aay _ Evidence Library 5, 4RE Annual Device License On oF an. “enn ‘adr
_SEWARE-DEV-FEE Support Fee So 108 5195-00 5800 83,705.00
Evidence Library 5, VISTA/V300 Annual Device
SFAW-BWC-DEV-FEE License & Support Fee 49.00 $195.00 $0.00 $9,555.00
Shipping and Handling" 7 ;
Part Number Detail Qty Direct Discount Totaf Price
Freight Shipping/Handling and Processing Charges 4.00 $855.00 $0.00 $855.00
$79,716.00
Total Estimated Tax, may vary from State to State $0.00
Configuration Discounts
Additional Quote Discount
NOTE: This is only an estimate for 4RE & VISTA related hardware, software and WG Technical Services. Actual costs related to a
turn-key operation requires more detailed discussion and analysis, which will define actual back-office costs and any costs
associated with configuration, support and installation. Please contact your sales representative for more details.
To accept this quotation, sign, date and return with Purchase Order: DATE:
415 E, Exchange Parkway * Allen, TX « 75002
Tall Free {800} 605-6734 * Main (972) 423-9777 » Fax (972) 423-9778
www, WatchGuardVideo.com
Page 2 of 2
WATCH (?} GUARD
CUSTOMER:
ATTENTION:
PHONE:
E-MAIL:
Waterford Police Department
Lt. Tim Silva
860-442-0645
tsilva@waterfordct.org
ARE and VISTA Proposal
Additional Software and Licensing
A4RE/VISTA Price
Quote
ISSUED: 11/18/2019 8:41 AM
+ 12/20/2019 4:00 AM
SALES CONTACT: Kevin Coughlin
DIRECT:
E-MAIL:
kevin.coughlin@metorolasalutions.com
Qty
Part Number Detail Direct Discount Total Price
Software, REDACTIVE(sm), Enterprise User ~
KEY-WGV- REO-E £01 License, Rey 3.0 7 - 1.00 7 _ $5,995.00 90.00 $5,995.00
~~ REDACTIVE(sm). Software Support &
WAR-WGR-AINT-3YR Maintenance, Year Bundle 1.00 $2,795.00 $0.00 $2,795.00
_Shipping and Handling _
Part Number Detail Qty Direct Discount Total Price
Freight ~ Shipping/Handting and Processing Charges 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$8,790.00
Total Estimated Tax, may vary from State to State $0.00
Configuration Discounts
Additional Quote Discount
$0.00
$0.00
NOTE: This is only an estimate for 4RE & VISTA related hardware, software and WG Technical Services. Actual costs related to a
turn-key operation requires more detailed discussion and analysis, which will define actual back-office costs and any costs
associated with configuration, support and installation. Please contact your sales representative for more details.
To accept this quotation, sign, date and return with Purchase Order:
DATE:
415 E, Exchange Parkway « Allen, TX * 75002
Toil Free (800} 605-6734 » Main (972) 423-9777 © Fax (972) 423-9778
www.WatchGuardVideo.com
Page 1 of 2
WATCH *}GUARD AREIVISTA Price
Quote
415 £. Exchange Parkway « Allen, TX * 75002
Toll Free (800) 605-6734 » Main (972) 423-9777 ¢ Fax (972) 423-9778
www. WatchGuardVideo.com
Page 2 of 2
D/E/F Services Group, Ltd
1171 Voluntown Rd., Griswold, CT 06351
(860) 376 — 4896, Fax (860) 376 — 1213
(AA/EOE)
“The Value of One”
May 18, 2020 Low Voltage
SUBJECT: 6 Data drops at the PD.
D/E/F Services Group, Ltd is proud to present the following proposal to the Town Of Waterford to supply labor
and material to install 6 Data drops at the PD.
Project Scope
e D/E/F will install data drops in the following locations:
o 3singlte data drops in the roll call area
o three port data drop in roll call
o idrop in the Sgt Office
o 1dropin the “DD”
e ~All drops will be:
o Run using Cat 6 Plenum rated cables
o Supported every 4-6 feet
o Make use of proper penetrations
o Certified with test reports available upon request
o Terminated on an unloaded patch panel in the MDF
Labor 24. hours @ 70/hour $1,470.00.
Total Quote ete
Statement of Clarifications and Excluslons:
¢ Bid Bond, Performance and Payment Bonds are excluded
Installation of additional grounding methods/means is excluded
Any and all utility fees and/or usage charges for power is excluded
Dumpster, trash / debris removal from site is excluded
Saw-cut slab and Patch to Match is excluded
Any and all site work outside of scope is excluded
Overtime / additional time caused by delays due to other trades or schedule acceleration is excluded
Additional work requested by customer will be performed on a Time & Material basis with labor at
current service rate ($85.00/hour) and material at cost plus 20% with ail applicable taxes and fees.
¢ This proposal is contingent upon a complete scope review between the authorized personnel and
D/E/F Services to ensure over-all project intent.
Commercial Clarifications:
4. For projects with an estimated completion time of forty-five (45) days or less, a down payment of 1/3 of
the contract total is due upon contract signing. Another payment of 1/3 of the contract total is due upon
completion of rough-in inspection. The remainder of the contract is to be paid out upon completion of
work.
For projects with an estimated completion time over forty-five (45) days, project billing will be monthly
or as a project section or unit is completed and payment is required no more than net thirty (30) days.
Paid when paid will not be an acceptable contract option.
Retention will not be more than 30 days / 90 days upon project substantial completion @ 7.5%
This proposal is valid for a period of thirty (30) days.
State of Connecticut sales tax is excluded in this proposal
Fee for required permits has been excluded
N
NAGE S
8. All work to be performed 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM Monday through Friday, excluding holidays arid overtime.
Warrants:
Ali work is warranted for a period of one year from substantial completion.
Schedule:
D/E/F Services Group could be on site and prepared to start installation within (15) days after receipt of a
purchase order or notice to proceed.
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to call us.
Please sign and return this proposal (below) if this proposal is acceptable and you would like begin coordination
to proceed.
Regards,
David Hatch
Low Voltage Project Manager
DHatch@DEFWiring.com
Direct # (860) 213-0081
D/E/F SERVICES GROUP: CUSTOMER:
By: _By:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
Purchase
order:
To initiate order please
1. Fax back to 860,376-1213, or
2. Email copy to dhtach@defwiring.com
Page 2 of 2
BISVAVd SLNNODOY INL
SALVLS Q3LINN : Od nein
: oo SBLWLS.G3LINO $8690 19 quOsuaLWM ‘eg
$8690 10 QuOswaLM ODL
GY AYWS4 ad0u $1 oe Ce-AUMA4 Ido St seweny
STIOOHOS ONsNd aYOsaLYM STOOHOS ONENd GHOJUSLWM : veumeuBig
ot dius ong eourjdacoy Jawojsna
“@aSIMayjo Jo BI
30 aunizy Aue Buipuejsupayou paleniiep paweap aq syonpoid pue suojonasul o}-diys ueyUM sJeWojsno WIM souRplozoe
20} suonesedo paydnusip sey o1wapued jeqo|6 au; yey) SulziuBooey “@d!0Aut aif o} peppe aq jim 1!
‘Ouaz S| JO ‘payeoipul si junowe jyBiay ssejur) Juawaoe|d sapio 0} Joud Gu
SIU "NSE B S¥y “1O.QUOD ,Snig@ PUoeq PUR ‘soNOU OU JO APA UI ‘sjonpod
ISO[o Ayyloes o} anp ydiasay Jo) UBls 0} jauUOSIad dawojsno
AJSAIAP 403 sjonpord diys |W snige@ ‘suoneziuebio Aue
‘XEL SBS Woy jdwexe si Aueduios of -N1g SS3]UA) “SdIOAU! 31) 0) pappR aq fA JYBiay!
d WAUYUOD QSEAq “BAOGE paayal ajep uoeudxe ay] aiojoq uaAae ‘aoljou jnoujm abueyo o} yoalgns st ajonb|
A} Auew 10) sesearou! soud Bulsnes ae Syodwl uleLe0 Uo syue} 05 gp jussey “Aunbur noX Joy nod yueuL
‘SPUN}J0.Uojelidosdde-uou.0} anp-ayeusUa}.O} me! AQ poyinbss-sieswuojsno soyoas.oygnd Aq-adeoxe Losear Aue 303)
@iqejeques-uow ale -sjemeuas onewoine.pue s}uauysnipe Ayjuenb:'suo-ppe: ‘sees uoduunsuod:‘seBelea0 PSLNIUr-J@WO}SNd: YW Buoje ‘sSuayo.oyloads Joy:suoweBilqo juawuAed poled
Auy"slus9} uonduosqns Jo: sjusueaibe iesn pus Jaysiigndvainjoesnueu:o} 309(qns:s)'sniga’ Aq Ploses sjonpold: seyjo 40 seouas’ uoRduosqns ‘BIEMYOS JO BSF} “SULD} Og 'poyudesd Aue|
40:S0uUe}ds00e powisap. aq jou jeYs soueUUOLed sniga pue ‘Aidde jjeus Joplo aseyoind 2 ursuue} ARUOD JO JeUORIPPE ON “Wan6 WOd'sN|do" MMM Je PE}EIO| SBOIES JO/PUe soNPolg
40} SUONIPUCD PUB SUUdL JOWO}SND ay} UgUIZaIBE YONS Oust S19UR Jf JORUOT LOPES" onGNd ageoldde' so snige ipl yuSU!
0152 paubis: s,uoneziueBio inok Aq’ pauanoB: ae SIBPIO [fy
ebege'z. *(asn).1e0L
co'o
(asn):punedus
aiqeouddy 3 dan: (asn) xex
sBupjaeg
ebege'z (SN) 1e390.L.ang Burddiys
ereger
E601 22°60) b A@S GH 00%2 S/HD9 VLVS SLE dH AVLE001 z00
Le6Se'e | b8'6S2'z b 9 dOLM OSS AOTLS ANIL OOL LEVEl LODyZ WEVELNeSAAs| 100
BM IX aod Wun ALOe > S®}0N Ourjuonduoseq ; Sdn: JequNN Hed. Joo SON OUP
Wwoo'snide@ejuelds :wewy oannoexy yunossy Shido
2ZE1-S19- 182 :8u0Ud SARNIeXy yuNody 0Z0Z/Z0/Z0 t81eq UoREJOND
SIUC BABS ANSOXA JUNO. s@WRN 930ND
0202/90/80 ‘seq UoReudx3 woo'snids@piemoys syeury yoddng saes ZL PLZSzz :ON EJOND
JON 49R10, ZLSE-C97-C09 :aUOYY yoddns sees SIOOHOS -
[ON Od 2aWO}sND PIEMOH PY 39eWUOD yoddng sees SMNENd GYOSYALLVM ‘oweN owoysng
b40 | aBeg
80"L9S'P (agn) 130k
00°90 -(asn) punredus
ayqeouddy: dg Hasn)xer
80'L9S‘y asm) reoL.ans
80"
LoSp
TWAOWSS & jl
HT Dge/0 .
igo'zee goes 4 Ld? “LOWINOOL d8? HLIM 0026 SNXEN GENXSxe dNS UNLYd oosio £ZBOXHEN-LNSA-NOD 200
8%d4
2S3}0N
ZOZOXSdBL-09819-LO SUIS Ped i ae
0z0z/0Z/90 :e3eq uoHeadxy
TON LORI,
20N
Od
saulo3snD
woo'snjde@ajuelds
oannsexy
junosay
sud 0Z0%/42/S0 793eq UOHEJONH
2ZEl-SLS-L8z OANNSEXy JUNODOY x
SUR] SARIS ‘OAHNSOX_ JuNODOYy “QOSPETS BOO sSUIEN AION
Woo'sni\de®premoya -weura poddng sajeg OZEOSZT 2ON B}OHH.
Z}GE-€97-C09 :ouoyd poddng sajeg QuYOdY
~-
730 | obeg
SNVYO:.d3 Tk Od Jowoysng,
SUID pa © SBLWLS GSLINN ‘area
» SALVLS. CELINA $8890: LO. QuOdyaLWM
$8890. LO. CHOSNSLWM i
OVON ANNES SdOu sh | GVON Aduas 3dOu. St ‘eweN
GuOSYaLYM JO: NMOL GYOIUEALWM JO NMOL -aanjeubig
OL dius Of [lg souejdasoy Jawojsn4
"BSINUBLIO 10 Bulsojo Ayjoes 0} anp ydis09d Jo) UBIS 0} jauUOsiad JeWWO}sNO
30 eunjies Aue Suipueysyymjou peJenlap paweap 9q [lm sjonpoud pue suolonusui OFdiYys UaRUM sJewojsno YM aouBPIOooR UI AraAyap Jo} SJonpo.d diys |IM shige ‘suoneziuefio Auew
10} suogeisdo pajdnusip sey awepued jeqol6 ayy yeuy BuiztuBossy “soloaul 94) 0} pappe aq [jim 1 ‘xXeL safes wo4
y }iwaxe si Auedwios of-1Ig ssajuy "SO/0AU! 34} O} pappe aq JIM JUuBIey|
‘O19Z S| JO ‘payeoipul s| JUNOWE WYBIay sseluN jUaWedeld Japso 0} Jold Buloiid uuYUoS osea|y ‘eAoge Pape eyep uopesdxa oy) a10ojaq UsAd ‘aonoU JNoUIM ehueyo o} yalgns s! ajonb
Sip WINS, & Sy "JoAUOS ,Snjd@ PUoteg pue ‘eoyou OU Jo aRIY YR ‘sjonpold 1) Aue Jo) SaseatoU) Boud BuIsneD ave sHodui urepso UO sy) A068 Sp juscsy “Aunbul inod 20} nod yueU
dozoas:aygnd:Aq:jdeoxe.uoseas Aue: 104]
2IqejsoUeS-UOU ele: sjemeuos OneWWOINe pus. sjusugsnipe Anuenb.‘suo-ppe.'ssey UoRdUNSUOD.“saBeieo PaUNoULsewosno: yum Buoje ‘shuveyo oyisads' joy suonebiiqo juauced oIpoued
Auy.:Suu9} Uonduosgns Jo sjuoWeaube Jasn. pudJ9L) and/saunjoejnuewlo}. joalqns. si snigd Aq:ploser sjonpoud sauyo.40 SeolMes.UOdUoSAns ‘aleMyos JO S87) "“SLU3} Od pazuudald: Aue
40 s0ue}ds00e pauisep.eq jou JeYs souewojied snjgo pue “Ajdde'jjeys sepso aseyound e-ul- sua} Are.qu09 30 JeUuonIPpe. ON "WAA0B WOO'sn| da:MWMM 2e payeoo] SEDIAIEG JO/pUe sONpog
10) SUCRIPUOD PUB SULSL 9WOISND al} juaWieesHe YONS ou's!' ala) J! JOBNUOD JOINS oIIGNd a[qealidde Jo snide UM JUsWeelbe paubls s,uojeziueBio unok Aq pauaaoG ase slepso ry!
PHONE: 860-442-0553
wunvwaterfardctorg
July 16, 2020
Mr. Thomas Dembek, Moderator
Representative Town Meeting
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Dear Moderator Dembek:
At the meeting of the Board of Finance held, Wednesday, July 15, 2020, it was voted to recommend to
the Representative Town Meeting, an appropriation in the amount of $259,300 from the Capital and
Non-Recurring designated Ll# 20501-57639 (Revaluation).
| respectfully request you place this item on the agenda of the next meeting of the Representative Town
Meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
ferretee Reeder *
Ronald R. Fedor, Chairman
Board of Finance
RRE:mtm
bo.
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
PHONE: 860-442-0553
wwwwaterfordct.org
July 8, 2020
Mr. Ronald Fedor
Chairman
Board of Finance
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Assessor - Additional Appropriation Request
Dear Chairman Fedor,
The Board of Selectmen, at their meeting on Tuesday, July 7, 2020 voted to approve the
following request:
Assessor: To consider and act on a request from Kim Allen, Director of Finance for an
appropriation in the amount of $259,300 from Capital and Non-recurring designated line #
20501-57639 — Revaluation and forward onto the Board of Finance as required.
Therefore, I respectfully request that you consider and act on this request. I have attached
pertinent back up material from the designated department.
Sincerely,
Dis Buuc
Robert J. Brule
First Selectman
Enclosure
lon.
PHONE: 860-442-0553
wwwwaterfordct.org
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
TO: Robert Brule, First Selectman
FROM: Kim Allen, Director or Finance
RE: Appropriation Request
DATE: — June 25, 2020
The Revaluation for the Assessor’s department is an approved Town of Waterford capital
project.
The project has gone through the full RFP/Bid process and a contract will be awarded after the
funds are appropriated.
The finance department respectfully requests an appropriation in amount of $259,300 from
Capital and Non-recurring designated line # 20501-57639 (Revaluation).
INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
Date: June 24, 2020
To: Rob Brule, First Selectman
Ce: Rawle Dummett, Purchasing Agent
Kimberly Allen, Finance Director
From: Paige Walton, Assessor
Subject: Proposal Evaluation and Award Recommendation for BID #20-104
Submitted herewith for your review and concurrence is the award recommendation for the
above referenced Request for Proposal. All proposals for Joint Reappraisal and Revaluations for
the Town of East Lyme and the Town of Waterford that were received in response to Bid #20-
104 have been individually evaluated by myself and East Lyme Assessor, Diane Vitagliano.
HISTORY
On May 22, 2020 a Request for Proposal was issued soliciting joint proposals for the towns’
upcoming 2021 and 2022 state-mandated property revaluations. The objective of the RFP was
to contract with qualified and experienced firms to complete this project.
To meet the statutorily mandated revaluation requirements while taking into consideration
cost control, the towns sought proposals for a full revaluation to include data mailers and
physical inspections to be conducted for a limited percentage (40%) of parcels per town. As
options the town also requested that proposals include the cost for full revaluation services
with data mailers and physical inspections of all improved parcels, and a separate option for
images to be updated for all parcels.
As anticipated, by conducting a hybrid versus a full inspection revaluation, the cost to the town
of Waterford is substantially fess with savings ranging from $109,700 to $136,000.
Proposals were opened on June 19", 2020 and the following three (3) proposals were received
and reviewed:
e Vision Government Solutions
e Tyler Technologies Inc.
¢ Municipal Valuation Services, LLC
PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS
Proposals were examined for responsiveness and compliance with all requirements included in
the RFP. A point and weight system was then utilized to evaluate each proposal by assigning a
score (between 1 and 5) to each of five established categories which was then multiplied by
each respective category's weight (listed below).
Categories Weight
1. Experience 25%
2. Staff/Team Qualifications 25%
3. Approach To Project/Cost 25%
4. Work Schedule 15%
5. Other Considerations | 10%
Total 100%
1. Experience: Criteria included a minimum five (5) year certification as a Connecticut
Revaluation company; demonstrated consistent, long-term success with past municipal
revaluation projects and appraisal experience/familiarity with Connecticut and New London
County real estate market.
2. Staff/Team Qualifications: Criteria included the firm’s ability to meet the minimum
requirements outlined in the RFP; Qualifications and experience of key personnel assigned to
project and the staff's familiarity and experience with the towns’ current CAMA software
version.
3. Approach to Project/Cost: Criteria included the firm’s demonstrated understanding of the
project; the towns’ specific needs as outlined in the RFP and overall cost.
4. Work Schedule: Criteria included the firm’s ability to meet the towns’ respective schedule
requirements; identification of critical & key milestones and the availability of the firm’s
proposed staff to work on the project.
5. Other Considerations: Criteria included the firm’s compliance with the RFP in providing all
required information; overall quality and completeness of the firm’s proposal and
presentation; availability to the public, town officials etc. and the existence of an established
public information program.
In addition to scoring each proposal by the above point and weight system each Assessor
evaluated the overall proposals and associated options on a cost per parcel basis. A separate
comparison spreadsheet containing each firm’s cost per parcel by option and Assessor's
accompanying notes is attached along with each town’s completed rating forms.
SUBMITTED PROPOSALS
Listed below is a synopsis of each responsive proposal submitted.
Vision Government Solutions
The highest rated response; excelling in the following areas:
Experience — familiarity with Connecticut shoreline towns, long list of satisfied
Connecticut municipal clients
Excellent staff & team qualifications — key personnel assigned to project are
highly qualified; both towns utilize Vision CAMA 8 software
Excellent overall proposed work schedule
Highest rating for proposal presentation and public information program
24 highest cost per parcel — (for limited inspections plus images proposal}
Tyler Technologies Inc.
The second highest rated response (Waterford) — third rated (East Lyme):
Experience — long list of Connecticut municipal clients
Excellent overall proposed work schedule
Good overall approach to project — (with exception of specifics regarding
inspection criteria and quality control not provided)
Questionable staff experience — Proposed project managers lack waterfront and
commercial experience
Poor rating for other considerations — Subject of ongoing lawsuits brought by
former clients; CAMA licensing software concerns which may affect utilization of
proprietary software. Survey of recent clients revealed dissatisfaction with firm’s
performance. Major errors discovered in firm’s commercial property valuation
approach & results.
Highest cost per parcel _- (for limited inspections plus images proposal)
Municipal Valuation Services LLC
The third rated response (Waterford) — second rated (East Lyme):
e Marginal Experience — short client list; very small company with limited staff-
past revaluation projects included limited scope (hybrid/data mailer only).
Concentration in fee appraisal as opposed to mass appraisal.
© Good/Marginal approach to project — Did not address required inspection
criteria as outlined in RFP — focus on data mailer inspections only based on firm’s
criteria rather than towns’. No specific approach provided to meet towns’
requirements.
¢ Poor rating for other considerations — Limited exposure to V8 CAMA software,
CAMA licensing software concerns which may affect utilization of proprietary
software.
e Lowest cost per parcel - (for limited inspections plus images proposal)
RECOMMENDATION
After a thorough individual and collaborative evaluation process conducted by both Assessors
we recommend an award be made to Vision Government Solutions. While other respondents
offered good overall proposals, Vision Government Solutions can provide the required services
at a competitive cost. Based on their proposal and experience, Vision Government Solutions
offers the best value in support of each town’s revaluation needs.
For the Town of Waterford | recommend Vision’s full revaluation proposal with limited
inspections for an overall cost of $259,300. The $109,700 savings realized by limiting the
number of physical inspections allows for the town to retain the services of a specialized
appraisal firm to assist in the valuation of the Dominion Millstone Nuclear Power Station.
Attachments:
1. Individual Town Evaluation/Rating Sheets
2, Summary Cost Per Parcel
‘Sie ppig {fe Aq paplwigns sam spudg pig
7BOuVd Yad 00'rs abeupzuondg | aouvd ud 00'vs abeuiyz uondo 7
NOISSINNS ON uoysedsur [ing | wend |NOISSIMIGNS ON uosedsurting -uondo | SAIDOIONHOAL
00°00L S28 yanoury 00°02 Paes yanouy | Ha1AL
TaOuVd Yad Fes ebeujzuondo. adv Had 9s 7 ebewpz uondg SaDIANaS
aoroo0'osEs uonsadsur lind | UoRdS [00 000 2966 woRDeASuT TAA 1 uondo | NOLLWN IVA
00°000'sz2s qunowy 00°000 Lezs junouiy 3 AWdIOINOIW
00°002'8L$ abewl z uondo OO'0OF'6LS aBeuy z-uondg |
00 000 Soe uonoedsul n+ }.409dQ} 00'000 69e$ uonjsedsul [ing - uondgG NOISIA
00-002 eszs yunoury 00008 eszs qunouiy
worssiwgqns oui yseQ uoIssiwiqns PIOPaLeAK Auedwog
wd-Q9:¢ @) 0207 /61/9 :suruad
OPig:
GORUNTeAY SULA] JSC Y/PAOJ19j3 MA: FOT-OZHPID.
yooyg uonENgqe
BJPPEEN ROPER PRE
WATEREBORD, (OF 6038
wiywwaterfordclorg
June 11, 2020
Mr. Thomas Dembek, Moderator
Representative Town Meeting
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Dear Moderator Dembek:
At the meeting of the Board of Finance held, Wednesday, June 10, 2020, it was voted to recommend to
the Representative Town Meeting, an appropriation in the amount of $155,287.12 from the Capital and
Non-Recurring designated Ll# 20560-57822 — (IT Learning Boards — end of life), based upon consistency
with Capital Improvement Plan.
| respectfully request you place this item on the agenda of the next meeting of the Representative Town
Meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Herre 7. Raden 77"
Ronald R. Fedor, Chairman
Board of Finance
RRF:mtm
PHONE: 860-442-0553
www.waterfordct.org
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
June 3, 2020
Mr. Ronald Fedor
Chairman
Board of Finance
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Board of Education - Additional Appropriation request for IT Learning Boards-end of life)
Dear Chairman Fedor,
The Board of Selectmen, at their meeting on Tuesday, June 2, 2020 voted to approve the
following request:
To consider and act on a request for an appropriation in the amount of
$ 155,287.12 from Capital and Non-recurring designated line #20560-57822 (IT
Learning Boards-end of life) and forward onto the Board of Finance as required
Therefore, I respectfully request that you consider and act on this request. I have attached
pertinent back up material from the designated department.
Sincerely,
| youd. Pole. pop
Robert J. Brule
First Selectman
Enclosure
PHONE; 860-442-0553
sewewwaterfordctorg
May 27, 2020
Mr, Rob Brule
First Selectman
‘Yown of Waterford
1S Rope Ferry Read
Waterford, CT 06385
Re: Bid Award — _ BIDH20- 102 Promethean Inferactive Boards and Installation
Dear Mr. Brule,
Bid Proposals for the above mentioned bid were opened on May 6, 2020 at 10:00 AM by
Kim Allen — Finance Director, Jeff Robillard - Network Engineer and [ with the atlached
results. After careful analysis of the submissions, I recommend that Pro AV Systems be
awarded the contract to perform the services stated in this bid for the amount of
$$155,287.12,
vailable from Line Item 20560-57822 IT Learning Boards End of
V
Raw le
ate Dunne —_
Purchasing Agent,
‘Town of Waterford
TOWN OF WATERFORD:
BID 20-404
FINTSEN ROPE FERRY ROAD WAVEREORD, CT Ces 74%
PROPOSAL FORM
PROMETHEAN BOARDS AND PROJECTORS WITH INTERACTIVE TOUCH FLAT PANEL
SCREENS AND INSTALLATION
PROPOSAL BID #20-102
PrOAV Sustems, 246 Billerica Ra cte 3 Chelmaeford NU
VENDOR NAME "° ADDRESS C2:
Adtienne Blasivoli, Dywector of Bid Deck
PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF VENDOR’S AGENT
190 -o92-SIN\ LP) /99-8-02-5282. (F)/ advienne 0 progvsi.
PHONE AND FACSIMILE NUMBERS, E-MAIL ADDRESS
, Adnenne Blasioh pivecter Of Bid Desk-
Name Position
Quantity Description Each Total
3 th AP7-U7S-NA-A ActivPanel Ni kel 75 ~ Freight Inck 4,
33 Promethean ctivPanel Nicke Freight Included b2]3YIT (03,426.46
33 Promethean AP86ASF
Promethean Adjustable Wall Mount System with Floor Support - Freight 4400.00 +24 Fou bo
Included ‘
33 Pro AV Systeins Miscellaneous - Parts
Paris needed for a complete system.
- Raceway and Boxes
+ Terminations
- Adapters
- 90 degree corner
- 5’ Panduit
£2,0,00 4440.00
Labor § ZI, 140-14
TOWN OF WATERFORD
BID 20-104
4. total Bias (5S,
28442
Above named firm hereby submit the following Proposal in accordance with Town of Waterford
specifications.
Hubhr g[i]eo2
SIGNATURE DATE
COMMENTS: Bond and Dumpster Coch included tm
installation Agure,
Mr. Joseph P. Mancini
Director of Finance
Mr. Thomas W. Giard fil
Superintendent of Schools
June 1, 2020
This request is for an appropriation in the amount of $155,287.12 from Capital and Non-
recurring designated line 20560-57822 IT Learning Boards.
This request is for the second year of the 5 year project to replace all of the learning
boards in the Waterford Schools. The useful life on these systems is roughly 10 years. Over this
past summer we replaced all of the smart boards at Quaker Hill Elementary School and this
request is to replace the boards at Oswegatchie.
In the elementary schools we are going with a solution from Promethean, this solution is
essentially a very large IPAD with incredible software. At Oswegatchie we will be installing 33 of
these systems throughout the school, this will be a replacement of the 11 year old promethean
boards.
This work will be done over the summer of 2020. Much like the high school turf field
project where we are appropriating money yearly to pay for the large expense in a few years, for
this project we are appropriating $200,000 per year to cover all the schools. The remaining
$44,712.88 will not be requested until we begin the high school project in two years.
Director of Finance
15 Rope Ferry Road * P.O. Box 284 * Waterford, CT 06385
Phone: 860-444-5849 * Fax: 860-444-5870 * www.waterfordschools.org
PHONE: 860-442-0553
wwwewaterfordetarg
June 11, 2020
Mr. Thomas Dembek, Moderator
Representative Town Meeting
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Dear Moderator Dembek:
At the meeting of the Board of Finance held, Wednesday, June 10, 2020, it was voted to recommend to
the Representative Town Meeting, an appropriation in the amount of $139,125 from the Capital and
Non-Recurring designated Ll# 20560-57827 — (IT Virtual Desktop Main processor), based upon
consistency with Capital Improvement Plan.
| respectfully request you place this item on the agenda of the next meeting of the Representative Town
Meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Honeelet TC Feecten “7
Ronald R. Fedor, Chairman
Board of Finance
RRF:mtm
PHONE: 860-442-0553
wwwwaterfordct.org
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
June 3, 2020
Mr. Ronald Fedor
Chairman
Board of Finance
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Board of Education - Additional Appropriation request for IT Virtual Desktop Main
Processor
Dear Chairman Fedor,
The Board of Selectmen, at their meeting on Tuesday, June 2, 2020 voted to approve the
following request:
To consider and act on a request for an appropriation in the amount of
$ 139,125 from Capital and Non-recurring designated line # 20560-57827 Virtual
Desktop Main Processor) and forward onto the Board of Finance as required.
Therefore, I respectfully request that you consider and act on this request. I have attached
pertinent back up material from the designated department.
Sincerely,
Ro huge. Gms vot
Robert J. Brule
First Selectman
Enclosure
PHONE: 860-442-0553
wwwwaterfordclorg
RRY ROAD
TP 06385-2886
May 27, 2020
Mr, Rob Brule
First Seleciman
Town of Waterford
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Re: Bid Award — BID#20-103 Acer Chrome Boxes and Monitors
Dear Mr. Brule,
Bid Proposals for the above mentioned bid were opencd on May 6, 2020 at 1:30 PM by
Rob Brule — Selectman, Jeff Robillard Network Engineer and 1, with the attached results.
After careful analysis of the submissions, | recommend that Consolidated Computing, Inc.
be awarded the contract fo perform the services stated in this bid for the amount of
$139,125.00.
Funds will be made-available trom Line Hem 20560-57827 (f Virtual Desktop Main
ee
- “
) ‘awle Duminett
-” Purchasing Agent,
Town of Waterford
Town of Waterford BId# 20-103
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD VEATERFORD, CP 06385-7884
PROPOSAL FORM
Chrome Boxes and Monitors
PROPOSAL BID #20-103
Consolidated Crnpling 380 tthechane Rood Casta 07 T Ove t
VENDOR NAME AND ADDRESS
Divid Lotupeah