Board of Selectman Special Meeting

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
PHONE: 860-442-0553
www.waterfordct.org
RECEIVED FOR RECORD
103 OCT 27: P 2 24
AGENDA ATES
BOARD OF SELECTMEN SPECIAL MEETING
Monday, October 30, 2023
5:00 PM
Waterford Town Hall (Appleby Room)
(Procedural Action: Check register to be signed by the Board of Selectmen in
accordance with CGS 7-83)
1. Call to Order:
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Public Comment:
4. Police Department — Disposal of Surplus: To consider and act on a -
recommendation from the Purchasing Agent, Shea Davy, on behalf of the
Chief of Police, Marc Balestracci, for surplus disposal of the following item
that is no longer useful to the Town:
e Spare Vehicle, 2005 Ford PU, VIN IFM5K8AR7FGA94448
5. Finance ~- Out-of-Series Transfer: To consider and act on the following
request for a FY24 Out-of-Series Transfer from the Director of Finance, Kim
Allen, in the amount of $1,600 for a cash counter and forward on to the Board ’
of Finance if approved.
6. Public Works - Additional Funding Request: To consider and act on a
request for an additional appropriation from the Public Works Director, Gary
Schneider, in the amount of $11,290 to line #33021-55867 (Cohanzie UST
Tank Removal) and forward on to the Board of Finance if approved.
7. Planning Department — Certificate of Adoption: To consider and act on a
request for a resolution adopting the Hazard Mitigation and Climate
Adaptation plan update, 2023-2028,
8. Adjournment:

AY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Viemo
To: The Board of Selectrnen
From: Shea Davy
Date: October 19, 2023
Re: Disposal ofaged assets
Dear Mr. Brule,
In accordance with the Town Property Ordinance, Chapter 3.08.020, it is requested
that the Board of Selectmen please consider an act to surplus for disposal, on Behalf
of the Police Department, 2015 Ford Explorer, VIN# 1FM5K8AR7FGA94448 Asset ID:
101322 Tag: Car 22. Upon your approval, the Purchasing Agent will dispose of this
item by auction.
Thank you for your consideration
Shea Davy
Shea Davy /
Purchasing Agent,
Town of Waterford

WATERFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
41 AVERY LANE
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2819
Marc Balestracci ; (860) 442-9451 TEL
Police Chief mbalestracci@waterfordct.org
To: Purchasing Agent Shea Davy, Finance Director Kim Allen
Cc: First Selectman Rob Brule
From: Marc Balestracci, Chief of Police
Date: October 19, 2023
Re: Vehicle Surplus Request
tam respectfully requesting the following vehicle be placed on the town’s surplus list:
Year: 2015
Make: Ford
Model: PIU
VIN: LFMS5K8AR7FGA94448
This vehicle is not part of the Fleet Plan and has reached the end of its service life. It was a vehicle that was
retained after having been replaced with a new vehicle, to be used solely for road jobs, It currently has 137,108
miles and 19,999 hours and all usable equipment has been removed. The vehicle has developed a water leak
which has resulted in a mildew/odor issue in the passenger compartment that has made it unfit for use.
This vehicle will be replaced in the near future by another vehicle. We are requesting that it be placed on the
surplus due to the high mileage, high engine hours, and the water leak/mildew issue,
Thank you for any consideration.
Thank you,
Marc Balestracci
Chief of Police
Waterford Police Department

TOWN OF WATERFORD
TRANSFER REQUEST FORM
Out of Series Transfer Request
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT
APPROVED CURRENT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REVISED
Budget Available INCREASE: DECREASE’: Available
Line No. Org. Cade Object Code Object Description Amount Budget Budget
1 10107 52040 SERVICE CONTRACTS & SERVC 49,109 19,235 (1,600} 47,635
2 10107 54060 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 9 i¢] 1,600 1,600
3 0
4 ie)
5 0
6 Q
7 Q
8 0]
g 0
10 i]
0
G
TOTAL 1,600 (1,600)
Explanation
A CASH COUNTER WILL BE PURCHASED TO CREATE EFFICIENCIES IN COUNTING CASH DEPOSITS - TIME SAVINGS AND ERROR REDUCTION.
THE COUNTER WILL ALSO CHECK FOR COUNTERFEIT CURRENCY.
KIM ALLEN
Department Head
KIM ALLEN
Director of Finance
First Selectman
Commission/Board Approval
10/18/2023
Date
10/18/2023
Date
Date
Date
revised 9/9/20

%0°
00°00
00°OG
o0°0
oo°00z
60°O
00°
002
ONISTEMHACY OTOZS
SB°ES
ge
LSE
TE
00°70
¥9°666'6
00°LS6°TP
o0'o
00°LS6
‘TR
“Worl
ve
LOTOT
“WO°IA OC6TS
%0°
oo7s9s’Z
00°9O
00°o
00°S99'%
00°70
00°S9S°Z%
SLIAENGG
BONTYS
TETS
LOTOT
S0°T
6°
2797
00°C
TS°
LE
00°059°Z
o0*O
00°0S59‘Z
SWITMZAO OT8TS
S6°
ET
90°
ZR
ZT
o0°Oo
6
SOE
‘SE
OO"OEL
‘LOT
oo"o
OO‘OEL‘LET
TWOINHOSL
ONY
T¥OTUETO
DTETS
LOOT
%0°9S
OT
LET
TLE
o0°o
06°0S07S6
00°82z‘99E
oo°o
00°827
‘99
NOTLVULSINIWNGY
OTITIS
LOTOT
B0°SS
zZe"S96
‘TZ
00°90
Bo°TzZE7L
00°L8776Z
o0°O
00°L82
‘67
STWIOLGSO
AHLOGTE
OTOTS
LUTHT
STWIOIGIO GELOFIA OTOTS
GONWNIG LOTOT
ANNa TWHENZD LOT
agsa
%
ESGNd
WIGWIIVAY
SHONWUENNONE
GHONHaXE
GLA
LH9a0a
GHSTART
SENSCOW/SNWAL
doddd¥
TWNIOTAO
€LT
¥z0z
Hoa
pngp3ATb
|
IMOaM
Lgpana
Aiwa-oL-awaz|
USTTeA
Tv
al
LO
‘pxozzezem
FO
uMoZ|
OT:80
€z0Z/8T/OT
sjunw

30°
oo-SstT
0070
ooo
OO°STT
00°70
oo*StT
FJMALINIAA
OOPS
LOTOT
%2°
86
SE°9SE
L6°822
“OT
Bo"
FTh’6
00°0000Z
0070
00°000
702
SHITddAsS
AOIAIO
OTOES
Z
SHITddNS FJOIAIO OTOES
LEG
ts"eso’T
zeeeo
It
LT
L9S‘h
00°6S9‘9T
00-0
007659
79T
ANOHAH1aL
ze
COTOT
SNOHASIAL 0807S
30°
o0°00T
00°0
o0"0
00°OOT
00°0
00°00T
SHSNGdXa
AIAVSUNGNI
TG
OL0CS
LOTOT
0°07
oO
T8E
“6
To°o
66
6EE
‘Z
00°
TZL
‘TT
00°70
OO*TZL‘TT
NOILWONGS
3%
SHONTWAANOD
’sand
OsoeS
LOTOT
SB°09
Pr
SE7‘ET
6L°
PEE‘
HT
LL
8€6
FT
00°60T‘6F
90°O
0060167
SUYIVdze
GNY
“LNOD
FAOLAYES
oFOcS
LOTOT
SUIVdad
GNY
LNOD
AOIAMES
OFOcS
¥3L°
008
6b"
2Ob-
LS
Sb6
‘TY
76°
8S8
ET
00°00r
"SS
0070
00°00r
‘Ss
SHa4a
TWNOISSHaOUdd
dens
LC
39°
0
QLOLL‘Z
o0°0
BESeE'T
00"000’F
00°0
00°000'F
BOYLSOd 0707S
agsn
%
ZHOCOd
WIAVITWAW
SHONWISHNONT
GgQNaaxXa
GLA
Lgoqna
agsramt
SLWSCOY/SNWEL
d0ddae
TYNISTYO
EL
PZ0Z
Hod
prqpzAT5
|
waodg
TASGna
ALwa-or-wwas|
UeTTeYX
z
al
Lo
‘proyzzazeM
FO
uno]
Ot:80
€20Z/8T/OT
doignios.
die
23144

xx
U8TTyY
ATzequTy
Aq
payexeueg
-
TYOGHM
JO
GN
xx
ByOE
0692S
‘SLE
O9°SPT‘S8L
bp
SPO
‘PET
OO"
TZL
‘LPL
00°0
OO;
TZL‘LEL
TWLOL
ONWHD
06°9Z5‘SLP
99°ShT’8L
vr
SvO'FET
OO*TZL*LbL
00°o
OOTLZL
‘LOL
SISNAAXT
THLOL
EOE
06°9ZS7SLE
99°SPT
‘BL
br
SHO
"FET
OO
TTL
LOL
00°70
OO*TSL‘LEL
BbOE
06°97S
‘SLE
99°SHT
‘SL
br
SbO
‘PET
OO*TSL“LEL
00°90
OO*TZL*LEL
aasn
%
La9008
AIAVIIVAY
SHONWHaWNONa
GSGNHEXA
GLA
TApGNG
dasIATL
SLHSPaY/SNWEL
aouday
TYNIOTYO
€T
F20¢
YOs
puqp34T6]
Tuoawa
LAGAd
Biwd-oL-awas|
UaT
Tey
é
al
LO
‘pzozze1emM
zo
uxoOL!
wournyos
dia
sale
STUN

Public Works _
Vviemo
To: Robert Brule, First Selectman
From: Gary J Schneider, Director of Public Works
cc: Kimberly Allen, Finance Director
Date: October 13, 2023
Re: Additional Funding Cohanzie UST
The project to replace the underground gasoline and diesel tanks at Cohanzie Fire Station has
been completed with the Investigation Report being issued and forwarded to the DEEP. Even
though we have use of the tanks and dispensers, the issue of the petroleum release had to be
Investigated. Due to the detection of motor fuel during the closure of this site, an investigation
was required to determine if this release had contaminated the ground water.
The Investigation Report, attached, states, “based upon the laboratory results and the
chromatographic fingerprints, groundwater has not be impacted by either of the petroleum
releases detected during the April 2022 UST closures and we therefore conclude that neither
release has impacted groundwater and no further action is required.”
in order to close out this project, the attached scope of services from the Engineering Firm
shows an additional $11,290 is required. Line Item #33021-55867 should be increased to
complete this project.
Public Works requests to be on the next Board of Selectman’s agenda and forward to the Board
of Finance, if approved.
Attachment (2)

Pry Gr
HALEY WARD,
EN AEE D ONL Et Rates
September 25, 2023
Mr. Gary Schneider
Director of Public Works
Town of Waterford
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Re: Investigation Report | Cohanzie Fire Station | Waterford, CT
CT DEEP Case Number 2022-01829
Deor Mr. Schneider:
Haley Ward, Inc, [Haley Ward) is pleased to provide you with this Investigation Report (Ihe
Report] to document ihe installation and sampling of four groundwater maniforing wells
at the Cohanzie Fire Stalion located af 53 Dayton Road, Waterford, Connecticut (ihe
Site). A Site Plan is attached as Drawing No. $-01.
The purpose of the investigation was fo defermine whether the release of motor fuel
detected during closure soil sampling of the former underground siorage tank (UST)
systems on April 26, 2022, had contaminated groundwater. Closure assessment activities
performed during the removal of two 4,000-galion motor fuel USTs (containing diesel fuel
and gasoline} and their associated dispenser islands revealed petroleum releases in the
tank grave (gasoline) and beneath the dispenser island (diesel fuel}. Because the
dispenser island release exceeded the applicable Remediation Standard Regulation
(RSR) criteria, the release was reported to the Connecticut Department of Energy and
Environmental Protection (CT DEEP] and was given Case No. 2022-01829,
The results of two rounds of groundwater monitoring are presented herein and they
support a conclusion, in accerdance with the Connecticut Remediation Standard
Regulations (RSRs) ihat groundwater has not been impacted by either release and that
no further action with respect to either release is required.
This report is organized by the fallowing sections:
* Background
* Fieldwork
* Results and Conclusions
Cily of Waterlord | 09.25.2023 | 4010193,20363 {| Page f
2210 Main Skeet, P.O. Box 1088, Glastonbury, CT 06033
Ts 860.689.3100 | HALEYWARD COA

BACKGROUND
Tne Cohanzie Fite Station is owned by the Town of Waterford and is located
approximately 500 feet (ft,) north of the intersection of Dayton Road and Kenyon Road.
Accarding to the Quaternary Gealogy Map {2010}, ihe Sife is underlain by thin til, which
is described as a non-stratified, glaciatlaid deposit overlying bedrock, and is typically
beiween 10 and 15 ft. thick. The material observed during fhe tank removal was a loose
sandy till, consisting primarily of fine-grained sand with same silt and is generally consisten}
with the map unit description of thin till, During the UST closure, bedrack and groundwaler
were not encountered fo the depih of the tank grave at approximately 12 fi. below
ground surface (gs).
The Site and the surrounding area are in a GA-classified groundwater area with public
water supply disiribution system available within 200 ft. of the Site. The Site is located
along a north-south frending ridge beiween Great Hill to the north and Twomile Hill 10 the
south. The fopography drops away moderately steeply towards the west, lo a small
Unnamed wetland located between Dayton Road and the Hariford Turnpike. A gradual
slope towards the east leads to a large nelwork of wetlands associated with Brandegee
Lake. According fo the Natural Drainage Basins Map of Waterford, Conneciicut (2012),
a major basin boundary beiween the Southeas! Cosial basin and the Thames River basin
is located trending north/south along the ticge passing through the Site immediaiely to
the east of iank grave.
The results of soil sampling performed for the Aprif 24, 2022, UST closure assessment
indicated that CT DEEP reportable releases had occurred from the dispenser island and
in the former tank grave (see Drawing $-01 for the site layout}. The GA Pollutant Mobility
Criteria {GA PMC) and the Residential Direc} Exposure Criterio {Res DEC) both apply to
these release areas as established in the Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations
(CT RSRs}.
+ Dispenser island Release Area — Diesel fuel contaminalion, as extractable folal
peiroleum hydrocarbons (ETPH}, was detected at a concentration of 747 ma/kg
beneath the wesiern end of the diese! dispenser island. The ETPH detection
exceeds both the RES DEC and the GA PMC for ETPH of 500 mg/kg, The release
appears io have been minor and may have resulted from drip leaks during routine
dispenser filter maintenance, On May 15, 2022, Haley Ward directed the
excavation of contaminated soil associated with this release. Soil was excavated
fo a depth of approximately 4 feet bgs where five excavation limit soif sampies
were collecled. The laboratory report showed thai all of the conlaminaled soit
associated with the release exceeding the Res DEC and GA PMC had been
removed,
+ Farmer Tank Grave Release Area — Benzene was detected at a concentration of
6.3 micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg) in a soil sample collected from beneath the
USTs indicating that a minor gasoline release may have occurred within the fank
grave, No other compounds were detected in this or ony of the other seven
Cily of Woterford | 09.25.2023 § <010193.20383 | Fage 2
PALCS WARD Cone

Bry Lr,
samples collected from the lank grave. The benzene concentration delected
was below fhe Res DEC of 21,000 ug/kg and the GA PMC of 200 ug/kg. Haley
Ward concluded that the tank grave samples hac delineated the release, and
that compliance with the applicable soil criteria established in the CT RSRs at
Section 220-133k-2(b}(1) for the DEC and in Section 220-133k-2(c}(I}(A} for the
PMC had been achieved. No additional soil remediation work was
recommended or ts required for the tank grave release.
As indicated above, following ihe excavation activities, both release areas now meet
ihe applicable remediation standards for soil and no additional work is proposed.
However, ihe potential impact of the releases on groundwater beneath the Site needed
fo be evaluated.
FIELDWORK
On April 11 and 12, 2023, Haley Ward oversaw the installation of four groundwater monitor
wells: OW-1 through OW-4, These weils were installed by Sife. LLC of Beacon Falls,
Connecticut using a CME S5LCX hollow-stem auger drilling rig. The locations of these
wells are shown in Drawing $-01, Boreholes were logged to identify soil stratigraphy and
screened for organic vapors using a handheld Rae Systems analyzer equipped with o
10.4 eV pholoionization detector larnp {PID}. Soil cores recovered fram Shelby Tube
samples consisted primarily of tan fine to medium sand with some cobbles, trace fo litile
sit, and generally consistent with soll observed during Ihe UST closures. The table below
summarizes PID readings. depth to saturated soil, and final monitor wail installation depih
for each boring. Copies of the boring logs are provided in Altachment A.
0.1 10 FTBGS
Ow"! 0.0 @ 22 FT BGS 2
0.0 @ § FraGs
Owe? 0.1 @ 10 FT BGS 158 20.5
ow-a 00@ 12 FT BGS 20 23
0.2 @ 12 FI BGS
OWA 0.2 @ 22 FT BGS 20 23
The monitor well installations consisted of 2-inch diameter PVC pipe with 10-foot long well
screens. The wells were finished with flush-mounted traffic-rated well boxes, and they
were developed by over pumping immediately following installation using a 12V down-
wellimpeller pump. One soil sample was collected from each boring al the groundwater
table interface and submitted to York Analytical Laboratory {York} in Stratford,
Connecticut for analyses of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including fuel
oxygenates, extractable total petroleum hydrocarbons (ETPH), and polyaromatic
Cily of Walerford | 09,25,2023 | 4010193.20383 | Page 3
HALEYRER SO DOAY

hydrocarbons (PAHs}. There were no detectable concentrations af these compounds in
any of the four soil samples. A copy of the laboratory soil report is included wilh
Atiachment 8.
On May 11 and July 19, 2023, Haley Ward traveled to the Sile to collect groundwater
samples from the four monitoring wells. Prior to well purging, each of the monitor wells
was gauged for depth fo non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL] and groundwater, No
LNAPL was measured in either monitoring event. The depth jo groundwater
measurements on fhe two cates varied from 16.5 fi. to 17.5 ft, in May and 19.4 ft. to 21.5
fi. in July, The monitor well groundwater elevation data is depicled in Drawings $-02 and
§-03 showing an approximate southwest to west flow direction across the Site. The
gauging data suggests that monitor wells OW-2 and OW-3 are approximately
upgradient, while monitor wells OW-1 and OW-4 are approximately downgradient of the
telease areas,
Groundwater samples were collected following low fiow purging in accordance with EPA
Low Stress (low flow} purging and sampling procedures for the Collection of Groundwater
Samples from Monitoring Wells. During the May 2023 monitoring event, groundwater was
generally purged at 150 ml/min. or higher causing all the wells to experience large
drawdowns. Samples were therefore collected as grab samples as soon as the waier
levels recovered sufficient to collect the required sample volume. During the second
monitoring event in July 2023, monitor wells were purged al or less than 85 mL/min. and
therefore purging occurred in accordance with the EPA pratacal, Copies of the purge
fogs for the July 2023 monitoring event are included as AHachment C. Groundwater
samples were transported to LEl's warehouse where they were refrigerated and then
transmitted under chain-of-custody to York Analytical for the analyses of volatile organic
compounds (VOCS) includiziy fuel oxyyenules, ETPH, and PAHs.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Applicable groundwater crileria for the Site are the Groundwater Protection Crileria
(GWPC)}, the Surface Water Protection Criteria (SWPC}, and the residential volatilization
criteria (RES VOL) as allowed by the conditions provided under the CT RSRs at Section
220-133k-3(d)}(t}{A}. Because the groundwater table is more than 10 ft. below grade,
the volatilization criteria for volatile petroleum hydrocarbons does not apply.
All four samples collected during both monitoring rounds were non-detect for the vast
majority of analytes except for acetone, naphthalene, and ETPH. Acetone was
detected in well OW-3 (May 2023) at a concentration of 4.97 parts per billion (ug/L) while
naphthalene was detected in well OW-! (July 2023} af a concentration of 0,130 ug/l.
Both compounds were detected al concentrations thal are significantly below their
applicable groundwater criteria, in fact. acetone is often detected in groundwater
samples because it is a common laboratory solvent. Based upon the mapped
groundwater flow direction, monitor well OW-1 is side-gradient (north) of both motor fuel
telease areas and is down-gradient of well OW-2 which was non-detect for naphthalene
City of Wolertord | 09.25.2023 | 4010193.20383 | Page 4

Pe Lx
{NOQ<0.05 ug/l) in both events. The trace conceniration of naphihalene detected in well
OW-1 appears to us to be incidental motor vehicle drip releases of oil and grease to the
parking lot followed by infiltration to the groundwater table. The RSRs provide for a
condition exemption for this lype of release and Haley Ward believes that it should apply
in this situation.
ETPH was detected during the May 2023 event in monilor wells OW 2 (0.279 mg/L}, OW 3
{0.275 mg/L}, and OW-4 (0.222 mg/L). The GWPC and SWEC for ETPH are both 0.250 mg/L.
and the samples collecfed from wells OW-3 and OW-4 exceed the criterion.
A review of the ETPH analyses for the Iwo monitoring events shows that all the -
chromatographic fingerprints from the May 2023 monitoring event are similar, In each of
fhe samples, including OW-1 which was reported as non-detect, the chromatograms
show regularly spaced individual peaks that ate similar fo the patiern of peoks for the
saturated hydrocarbons (straight chain paraffins or alkanes) used in the laboratory
control and timing stendards. Haley Ward discussed the loboratory results and
chromatograms with York's Laboratory Director, and we were assured thai the mass
under the peaks was the concentration reported and that there had not been any
QA/QC issues surrounding the analyses.
Because Haley Ward had very recently purchased a few rolls of test tubing from a new
tubing supplier, a decision was made to collect an equipment blank by running distilled
water through the recently purchased tubing. The distilled water sample was then
submitted fo York for analysis of ETPH. This sample was non-detec! (ND<0.220 mg/L} and
ihe chromatogram did not exhibil any of the unusual peaks other than a single peak at
aboul 19.5 minutes inio the chromatogram. A copy of the tubing blank is included as
Allachment D, During the secand monitoring event in July 2023, three of the four ETPH
onalyses were non-deteci while the cancentration in well OW-3 was 0.220 mg/L which is
below the GWPC and the SWPC. Copies of the laboratory reports for both monitoring
events are included in Attachment £.
Based upon the laboratory results, Haley Ward concludes the following.
1, The only VOC detected were acetone (OW-3 al 4.97 ug/L in May 2023) and the
only PAH detecied was naphihalene (QW-1 at 0,13 ug/L in duly 2023}. Monitor
weil. OW-3 is ai least 30 fi. up-gradient of the UST system hydrocarbon release
ateas, Monitor well OW-) {s about 40-50 #. side-gradient {north} of the UST grave
release area, The trace concentrations detecied in these monitor wells cannot
be associated with the motor fuel releases detected in the former fank grove or
beneath fhe diesel dispenser since acetone fs not present in gasoline or diesel fuel
and both lacations are not down-gradient of the release areas.
2. ETPH was delecied in monitor wells OW-2 (0.279 mg/l}, OW-3 (0.275 mg/l}, and
OW-4 (0,222 mg/L}. The chromatographic fingerprints from those analyses do not
exhibit a motor fuel signature from aifher gasoline or distillate range hydrocarbons,
The fingerprints show a distinct pattern of individual, regularly spaced saturated
Cily of Walertord { 09,25.2023 { 4010193.20383 | Poge 5
HALE ees Leet

alkanes. The monitor wells with the highest ETPH concenirailons (OW-2 and Ow-
3) are up-gradient of the UST system release areas while OW-4 is down-gradient.
The concentration of ETPH in OW-4 is below the GWPC and the SWPC.
3. The source of the ETPH groundwater coniamination is unknown. However, based
upon the chromatograms, it is nol related to the gasoline and diesel fuel releases
detected in the former tank grave or beneath the diesel dispenser.
4, Based upon the laboraiory results and the chromatographic fingerprinis,
groundwater has nof been impacied by eliher of the petroleum releases
detected during the April 2022 UST system clasuras and we therefore conclude
that neither release has impacted groundwater and no further action is required,
If you have any questions concerning the information presented in this report or if
additional services are needed, please contact Mark Lovejoy at (978) 786-9709. We
appreciate this opportunily to be of service to you.
Sincerely,
Haley Ward, inc.
Wol ZZ
Mark R. Temple, LEP Mark Lovefoy, PE, LSP, LEP, CHMM
Vice President Senior Project Manager
MALIMRT
Attachments
Cily of Waterford | 09.25.2023 j 4010193.20383 | Page 6

Cas
Puy Sx
HALEY WARD,
ENGINEERING | ENVIRONMENTAL | SURVEYING
October 5, 2023
Mr. Gary Schneider
Director of Public Works
Town of Waterford
15 Rope Ferry Raad
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Proposal for Professional Services, Conduct Additional Environmental Divestigations,
Sampling and DEEP Reporting, Cohanzie Fire House, Dayton Place, Waterford, CT
Dear Mr. Schneider:
As requested, Haley Ward, lac, (Haley Ward) Is pleased to submit this proposal for your review and
acceptance. As a result of additional contamination found during the underground tank removal
process, Haley Ward conducted additional rounds of monitoring well sampling, and created a new
Investigation Report for submittal to the DEEP.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1) Provided Additional Wel) Drilling Supervision
2) Conduct two rounds of water quality sampl{ng at the four on-site monitor wells.
3) Complete field survey and mapping of monitoring well network. Create groundwater
flow direction mapping.
4) Evaluate results and write new contamination report detailing historic groundwater
contamination found on site,
5} Submitting electronic copy of Investigation Report to DEEP.
PROPOSED FEES
Work was completed in accordance with the rates given in our current on-call contract.
Haley Ward Labor $ 9,600
aboratory Analyses £2,626
TOTAL FEE $12,226
Gary Schneider | 10-5-23 | JN | Page 1
2210 Main Street, P.O, Box 1088, Glastonbury, CT 06033
T; 860,659.3100 [ HALEYWARD.COM

my Pry
We hepe the Town finds our proposal acceptable, and we look forward to continuing to serve
Waterford on this project. Ifyou or others at the Town have any questions or comments, ] am
at your service,
Respectfully submitted,
Haley Ward, inc.
fom ULL,
mies EB, Ericson, PE
Regional Manager / Vice President
Gary Schnelder | 10-5-23 | JN | Page 2
HALEYWARD.COM

DRAWINGS

om
|
aw
)
les
i
SNOLLV201
TEM
YOLINOW
Beet
|
ago
eanz
£2
'O¥OsuSIYM
GVOE
NOLAVE
£¢
emmeeet
AVN
SVE
cena
SON
ANVdi09
SUI3
SIZNWHOO
ed
WM
AS
TWH
aa
Cae
en
fad
SWAS
BHdVED
IWUYS
88
GAON
NO
GIS¥@
SNOUVAZTT
&
Wha
£8
OWN
NO
G3SYG
SNOIUSOS
TF
"202
‘C1
Avr
NO
‘ON
‘OavAs
AZIVH
AG
ORLYIOT
STH
NOMMALISEO
Snow
at +
<a
wawsas0e
BESiZ
9291e
7M
vOSIZ
BS
SIZ
2-AG
LZGLZ
SLGIS
i-mo
Ad
uaAOD
TEA
i aa
£-KO.
Th
Rory
‘tied sya SOMO HOD oME TONAL aa TzHIHOD CHEE SBI Op oniTtnd TRA NOLEN FEALGTLDAO US MYL NOUS IW TRUMOD SACO AT Ow UA LOTMA EITC AT € KENSOT TD

om
|
iw
|
raw
dO" o98
OE
z0-s
anol
__ssnorie|
_wancre
SNOLLV901
TIM
YOL
NOW
BE
SSoeS
tavames
i
load
£S'50
£202
REOL
CO
Ce
MGS
we
5177
&
>
a
32
GUOAMBINM
QYOE
NOLAVE£5
*
sestesiai
|
M014
USLVMONNONS
G'ON
ANWdWIOO
Suis
SIZNV409
mila
w¥M
AS
TVH
\
aa
4
ie
apg
er
Fivos
DHAVES
eDAUBINAAT OTOL KHL 1 € AHP:
ALY
88
CAON
NO
O3SVG
SNOUVAITI
©
MNEVE
C8
OYN
NO
O35VE
SNOWSOS
Z
202
“et
AVA
NO
INI
‘elven
ARI
48
G2VIOI
STIIM
NOMYALISEO
“t
SSRION
ROVE
USLVMONDOXD
<<
8AOANOD
NBLWMINNOHS
ee/il/s
aaynsvan
7
nova
wauwmannosy
CEEEEE)
ONSSST
ve61
ZVRLe
OF
Le
4-0.
BFSIZ
9Z'91e
£-A40
ySIZ
SESS
eM
TOSS
FL'SIZ
iho
Dd
u3n0d
TRA
sea SUIRWWTADT Ave Ha SNQONETHONTLYA Gs HTlENKOD LES $9 OVI OWIINA MPA KOON CTE ATONE hrs HOAs Able TZN G

am
rr
|
pr
eee
s0-S
straval__anaeel
sonar
SNOILY9071
TIM
YOLINOM
BRET
season
coment|
ng
gf
irate7
Saco1
—-
LO
OMOIEREVM
GVOR
NOLAYG
tS
eee
vou
MO"s
HELWMONNOYS
S'ON
ANWdWOD
Sul
FIZNWHOO
mi
da
VvM
AAT
H
HOVE
OF
GRD
KO
GIEVT
NBEMATIF
©
HOVE
$B
GN
HO
OPI
SHGIUSOD
EF
EOL
'L1
AVPE
NG
NE
“Odivis
ATIWH
AB
OUVGOT
STI
NOWUVANISEO
'f
“SFiON
AOS
BBVAGNTONS
<—
YNOLNOD
uzivMONNOYS
se/ei/,
OFense
aK
ED
ROWVATID
BUVAGNNDYD
—~G83977
©
Meibing:
dag
>
|
eB,
Vauy SSva1SY
Cl
yi
Oe
rtZ
bom
|
ONY
1S!
YASNIASIG
BBSIe
Bo
OIF
£-8O
w9GIZ
BBS?
caetiel
|
SS6L
1ZGle
ez
GiZ
EMO
a
a
vauy
3ova73u
Ad
yxe00
aM
svowana
|
6
ON
OD
Fuld
peautiey
08
\S
INV
NaNO
BZNVHOD
rig i
ruses 103 Sts
DNA SEARO TBO Na AAaUUE MBO MHTIYNDS HeenGd CCST RST vd BHI NU TIS HOLDIN COMCE RIO NEL NOLEYET SRIF INDO EEE Eg aD sbegeH A HO PDE Babee dO Fae

AD
CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION
TOWN OF WATERFORD BOARD OF SELECTMEN
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE HAZARD MITIGATION AND CLIMATE ADAPTATION PLAN UPDATE, 2023-2028
WHEREAS, the Town of Waterford has historically experienced severe damage from natural hazards and it continues to be
vulnerable to the effects of those natural hazards profiled in the plan (e.g. flooding, extreme heat, droughts, severe storms
such as thunderstorms and winter storms, dam failures, wildfires, and earthquakes) resulting in loss of property and life,
economic hardship, and threats to public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, the Waterford Board of Selectmen approved the previous versions of the Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2005, 2012,
and 2018; and
WHEREAS, Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments, of whom the Town of Waterford is a member, has
determined that climate change is affecting the frequency and severity of some hazards and therefore elected to expand the
Hazard Mitigation Plan Update to become a Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Plan Update; and
WHEREAS, committee meetings were held and public input was sought in 2022 regarding the development and review of the
Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Plan Update; and
WHEREAS, the Plan specifically addresses hazard mitigation and climate adaptation strategies and Plan maintenance
procedures for the Town of Waterford; and
WHEREAS, the Plan recommends several hazard mitigation actions that will provide mitigation for specific natural hazards
that impact the Town of Waterford, with the effect of protecting people and property from loss associated with those
hazards while adapting to the effects of climate change; and
WHEREAS, Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments has developed and received conditional approval from the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for its Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Plan Update under the
requirements of 44 CFR 201.6; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this Plan will make the Town of Waterford eligible for funding to alleviate the impacts of future
hazards; now therefore be it
RESOLVED by the Board of Selectmen:
1. The Plan is hereby adopted as an official plan of the Town of Waterford;
2. The respective officials identified in the mitigation strategy of the Plan are hereby directed to pursue implementation of
the recommended actions assigned to them;
3. Future revisions and Pian maintenance required by 44 CFR 201.6 and FEMA are hereby adopted as a part of this
resolution for a period of five (5) years from the date of this resolution.
4, Anannual report on the progress of the implementation elements of the Plan shall be presented to the Board of
Selectmen.
Adopted this day of 2023 by the Board of Selectmen of Waterford, Connecticut
First Selectman
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has affixed his/her signature and the corporate seal of the Town of Waterford this
day of 2023.
Town Clerk

TOWN OF WATERFORD ANNEX
DOCUMENT
Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Plan Update
March 2023
PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:
Town of Waterford Resilient Land and Water, LLC
152 Rope Ferry Road With Assistance from
Waterford, CT 06385 The Connecticut Institute for Resilience
www.waterfordct.org and Climate Adaptation (CIRCA)

1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose of Annex
The planning process for the multi-jurisdiction hazard mitigation plan (HMP) update commenced in April
2022 and ended in December 2022, spanning a period of nine months. The planning process included
24 jurisdictions (22 municipalities and two tribal governments) with two participating together (Griswold
and Jewett City) for a net total of 23 local planning teams represented. For this 4” edition of the plan,
Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments (SCCOG) elected to link the planning process to a
parallel planning process administered by the Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate
Adaptation (CIRCA) that is known as “Resilient Connecticut 2.0” (stylized as Resilient Connecticut). The
Resilient Connecticut program is described on CIRCA’s web site at
https://resilientconnecticut.uconn.edu/ and the expansion of the program into southeastern
Connecticut is described at https://circa.uconn.edu/2022/02/23/resilient-connecticut-expands-
statewide/.
The linkage of the two planning processes was advantageous for the following reasons:
¢ Incorporation of climate change into the hazard mitigation plan update
© Increased interest from the local communities, especially for those interested in developing
climate adaptation strategies. .
e Direct incorporation of climate change vulnerability products developed by CIRCA including the
Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCV1) for flood and extreme heat vulnerabilities.
© Direct incorporation of combined sea level rise and coastal flood inundation simulations from
CIRCA
© Positioning of the SCCOG jurisdictions for new funding sources in Connecticut such as the new
Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) Climate Resilience Fund (DCRF)
© Consistency with the Governor’s Council for Climate Change (GC3) outcomes from the 2020-
2021 planning process
e Positioning of the actions for incorporation on the State’s “resilience project pipeline” per
Executive Order (EO) 21-3 issued at the end of 2021.
The planning process commenced for the local communities on April 20, 2022, with a presentation to
the SCCOG Board. During this presentation, the consultant and CIRCA described the planning process
and the approach for incorporating the Resilient Connecticut program into the hazard mitigation plan
update, and notified the chief elected officials that invitations to local planning meetings would follow at
the end of April. Local planning team meetings commenced on May 23, 2022, and ended on July 8,
2022. Workshops with local coordinators were conducted in July and September 2022, and
supplemental meetings with water utilities in the region and specific stakeholders continued through
November 2022. ,
The purpose of this HMP annex is to provide an update to the hazard Fisk assessment and Eapability
assessment provided in the previous HMP, and to evaluate potential hazard mitigation measures and
prioritize hazard mitigation projects specific to mitigating the effects of hazards on the Town of
Waterford. Background information and the regional effects of pertinent hazards are discussed in the
main body of the Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments (SCCOG) Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE ANNEX
WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
MARCH 2023 1-5

Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Plan (HMCAP). Thus, this annex is designed to supplement the
information presented in the Multi-Jurisdictional HMCAP with more specific details for Waterford and is
not to be considered a standalone document.
1.2. Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Goals
The primary goal of the previous hazard mitigation plans adopted in 2013 and 2018 was to identify risks
to hazards and potential mitigation measures for such hazards in order to reduce the loss of or damage
to life, property, infrastructure, and natural, cultural, and economic resources. This included the
reduction of public and private damage costs. Limiting losses of and damage to life and property was
also meant to reduce the social, emotional, and economic disruption associated with a natural disaster.
Coinciding with the incorporation of climate adaptation and the alignment of this HMCAP with the
Resilient Connecticut planning process administered by CIRCA, the five goals of this HMCAP are:
o Ensure that critical facilities are resilient, with special attention to shelters and cooling centers.
o Address risks associated with extreme heat events, especially as they interact with other
hazards.
o Reduce flood and erosion risks by reducing vulnerabilities and consequences, even as climate
change increases frequency and severity of floods.
o Reduce losses from other hazards.
o Invest in resilient corridors to ensure that people and services are accessible during floods and
that development along corridors is resilient over the long term.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE ANNEX
WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
MARCH 2023 1-6

8. Mitigation Strategies and Actions
8.1. Status of Mitigation Strategies and Actions
A total of 22 hazard mitigation actions were developed in the previous edition of this plan. The status of
each is listed below.
Table 8-1 Status of 2016 to 2021 Hazard Mitigation Actions
‘Mitigation Actions and Strategies for
| # Waterford 2016 - 2024 Status Status Details Ei
Evacuation signs have not been added. The
1 Acquire and install evacuation signs in Carry population in Waterford is relatively senior, so
coastal flood hazard areas Forward signs might still be useful. This action can
remain but should be made more specific.
The town does not own the land underneath
the road but has an easement. The road will be
resurfaced, will be able to be raised about 6-8
inches in the process. Pipes will be placed under
the road at a low point, and the road will be
' F ; Carry elevated about one foot in this location. The full
Continue to make evacuation routes in the a vais
2 Gardiners Wood Road area more reetilent Forward design is complete, but the funding is not yet
with there — estimate $4 million. The low point of the
through elevation, culvert upgrades, etc. Revisions | railroad bridge is a concern too. This is still a
high priority; a neighborhood is cut off when
this road floods. This might fit well with
Resilient Connecticut. Revise to indicate the
progress and make the action geared toward
remaining tasks.
Consider installing an emergency egress No progress. Not a priority, due to the very low
. Remov ; F : 5
a between Laurel Crest Drive and Miner Lane. eMOve residential population along this road.
In lieu of installing an emergency egress
between Laurel Crest Drive and Miner Lane, a
: ; : No progress. Not a priority, due to the very low
4 | determine other options for emergency Remove . " ¢ .
. : residential population along this road.
evacuation and egress from southern Miner
Lane.
5 Ensue relevant betsonnel know where the Complete | Document is available in several locations.
EOP is kept and are able to access it.
Funding to implement floodproofing in private
homes has been a challenge, and the
substantial improvement lookback w;
Consider potential need for a gradual Carry ‘ P ene lookDa yas recently
® hasing in of new policies related to SLR Forward changed downwerd to two'vears which will not
p 8 Pp drive flood mitigation. A 2-ft freeboard has not
been put into place. The Town would like an
aspirational statement for this action.
This current HMP update will help make
progress with this action. However, Town
Carry attendees explained that board and commission
upport is reportedly not strong for
Incorporate the results of the Coastal Forward s PP P yno 7 "
7 ae nee , incorporating many recommendations from the
Resilience project into the next HMP update with ai ¢ ;
ReUIsIaRe coastal resilience planning effort. The Planning
i
Commission is concerned that some of the
strategies in the plan will make it harder for
property owners to maintain their properties.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE ANNEX
WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
MARCH 2023 8-65

The revision to this action could rephrase this
action to “evaluate” coastal resiliency
recommendations or include actions that are
achievable. A recommendation that may come
from the POCD is to include this responsibility
under another board or commission.
Pursue enrollment in the Community Rating Remove - The town decided not to ian this
8 Remove due to lack of capacity relative to minimal
System 0 s
community benefits.
The responsible department for this action is
Utilities, not Public Works. The challenge is that
the sewer pumping stations are located in low
. . Carry points. Some of the facilities have been
Ensure that sewer pumping stations have a :
" Forward floodproofed, and some of the electric systems
9 method for connecting emergency power ; oe A
and are adequately floodproofed with inside have been elevated. There is more work
Revisions | to do. The Mago and Bolles facilities are
reportedly the next on the list; check the SCCOG
wastewater management plan and the Wright-
Pierce resilience study for details.
ai The town now uses Everbridge. Every listed
Include structures within the 1% annual " 4 ji ' Be. ie ‘boca
: landline (business and private) is in the system,
10 | chance floodplain and storm surge areas Complete 7 ‘
nh and the town makes it clear on social media
within the Reverse 9-1-1 contact database - :
how people can sign up other devices.
The town typically does not acquire RL
ies. Th ifi
Pursue the acquisition and demolition of Carry properties fae are no future specific
. . . acquisitions in mind, but if there was another
floodprone properties with conversion to Forward .
11 Somers a . future storm event that resulted in the town
open space, prioritizing repetitive loss with ca A
ti Revisl wanting to acquire a property then the town
properties eVvISIONS | would want the option. Revise the action to
focus on acquiring damaged properties.
i Carry The Ridgewood system along Alewife Cove is a
Upgrade stormwater collection and i '
12 | disch _ ta kee up with rising’ sea Forward concern but upgrades probably will not occur in
SENIALBE SYSLEMS LONER UP é with the near future. The town does not want to lose
level a . 4
Revisions | sight of this goal.
13 Replace culverts along Gardiners Wood Road Remove This is a variation of the previous Gardiner
and elevate sections of the road Wood action (#2).
c This was resurfaced (added a few inches) and
arry .
. the pipe was cleaned although not replaced and
Replace culvert and/or elevate a section of Forward a . .
14 A Road with additional improvements are still
ramen Revisi desired/necessary. The Great Neck area can be
VISIONS | cut off if this road floods.
Replace culverts and/or elevate sections of Carry
No progress.
iS Niles Hill Road at Fenger Brook Forward prog
Revise to be more achievable - This issue was
also identified in the coastal resiliency plan.
Carry There has been talk about restoring the pond
Rai d improve hydraulics of the Forward that the culvert serves and restoring some tidal
16 alee a p y - . . flow. DEEP has been interested in possibly
secondary access to Millstone Station with . . .
Revisi constructing a fishway. The main obstacle here
evislons is the private (and unclear) ownership of the
road, which is further complicated by
Dominion’s involvement.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE ANNEX
WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
MARCH 2023
8-66

Mailers have not been sent out. The town
suggests incorporating an online option for all
Carry —__| town residents and then a targeted mailing for
7 Send out an annual flood-hazard mailer to Forward residents in 500 year+ flood zones. It would be
homeowners. with helpful to put out a notice before hurricane
. Revisions | season. Keep this action but revise to be more
specific. FEMA has brochures that towns can
use.
No progress. There are a number of historic
Determine if any at-risk structures that are Carry Paterson Identified by SHP. oiln Waterford. ons
Se nae ; % F new historic district (Oil Mill) was designated a
not yet eligible for historic designation will Forward oe an
18 Shape f 5 . few months ago. Individual new historic
be eligible in the future. This may take the with :
agen is i structures have not been designated. The Town
form of a historic resources survey. Revisions
has concerns about wind loading at O'Neill
Theatre.
Consider drafting a written plan for
19 | inspecting and prioritizing the removal of Complete | Complete and capability.
snow from Town-owned structures
Prioritize snow removal from municipal
a0 buildings.
Complete | Complete and capability.
Complete - If the Miller Pond dam failed, many
houses would be underwater. This area can be
Include dam failure inundation areas in the identified in the Everbridge system for targeted
21 Raverse-9-1-1 contact database Complete _| communications by delineating a polygon for
the notification area. The dam EAP and Town
LEOP are currently being administered with
these targeted procedures.
Work with CT DEEP to ensure that the
22 | owners of high hazard dams have current Complete | Complete. EAPs are on file.
EOPs and keep local copies
During the planning process, CIRCA and consultant staff facilitated a discussion with the Town staff to
identify the greatest climate change concerns and challenges. The previous actions were re-evaluated in
this context. Elements of 12 prior actions have been carried forward into the new hazard mitigation and
climate adaptation actions.
8.2. Prioritization of Specific Actions
The proposed actions for the Town of Waterford to undertake from 2023 through 2028 are listed in
Table 8-2 on the next page. The full list of actions for the region with buildups for the PERSISTS and
STAPLEE scores are available in the multi-jurisdiction document.
The actions with the highest PERSISTS score and the highest STAPLEE score are different, which is
consistent with the intent of the two scores. PERSISTS scores tend to be higher for actions that maximize
public safety while advancing climate science and being transferable to other communities, whereas
STAPLEE scores tend to be higher for actions that are highly cost effective and technically feasible for
reducing losses from hazards. The actions with the highest combined scores are:
o. Establish a process for the phasing-in of new policies related to sea level risé (freeboard,
infrastructure retrofits, road elevations, etc.). The process could include incorporation of
additional goal statements into the POCD (2023) and capital improvement plans.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE ANNEX
WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
MARCH 2023 8-67

The Town intends to focus on the above actions, along with the sole action about cooling centers:
© Ensure that'the cooling center (Community Center) has appropriate standby power to operate
AC and is accessible using transit or alternate transportation options.
o Identify at least one secondary cooling center in a more accessible, centrally located position;
ensure that it has appropriate standby power to operate AC and is accessible using transit or
alternate transportation options.
This is consistent with the State’s emphasis on cooling center resilience.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE ANNEX
WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
MARCH 2023 8-68

69-8
ANDLOINNOD ‘ayOsNaLYM
XANNV 3LVGdN NV1d NOILVSILIA GYVZVH
“spool leydeo pue (€z0Z) ddOd aur
jo Aqlsanas pue Anuanbady. 0JU! SjUaWaze}s }eO8 jeuolppe
yespng saseasoul a8ueys azewl|o Jo uoesodsoou! apnjout pjnoo
OLT Ot Zt u3iH . je Sunessdo | Qo0‘OTs- 0s Buuue|d uonuanard se uana ‘saouanbasuod ssaooid ayy ‘(238 ‘suonensja | s4M
Eeaese Jedio1unw pue saniiqesaujna peod ‘syyoujas aunqonsyseyjut
Suronpau Aq sysu ‘paeOgaadj) asid [ara] eds 0}
uo|sose pue poo aonpay | payeja salsijod mau Jo ul-Suiseyd
BY} 104 ssadoid e ysijqeysz
“dVDWH
siya pue “(€Z0Z) GdOd uy} “(ZT0Z)
yespng Apnis uoneydepy pue juawssessy
GL S ST UsIH . ba Bunerado | 000‘0TS-0$ Suruueld pu0 uewg son Je08 auo uey} a0, sly aBueyD ayewjg aur | 4am
Jedioyuniy uaamjaq paunjoniys Ajuaysisuod
Bue BouUaTIISed 0} payejal
santafgo pue sjeo8 yey) aunsug
s 3 ‘193499 “passeoze aq Jouued au
avals ae d “ 1e!1YO asuodsay Buljooo pue siayays seq. e aus nie aunua! a
96 9 9T | wnipaw s20z/9 as 00/0055 payoa)3 Jary Anuagiaw3 | 0} uonUaye jeeds ym a MLS edS [ENO au uel 4M
°
-
€20C/L
48410
-
000‘00T$
s
SuO!}ENYS
104
493/aYs
290]
dnyDeq
‘ ay JO B213O | 7B ssauparedaig ‘qualyisas aie saii9ey ese joounseuoases) 32. ulbiule
SWINH VIN Jeo1qJ9 Jey} eansuy leou LE EAUIEW
. uoneyodsues ayeusaye 10 ysuedy
{squei3 Siequeo Bulsn ajqisseoce si pue ay ayesado
Scour. ed id “ IPO asuodsou Bujjog9 puE sistas : 0} samod K ues ayetdosdde
96 9 9T SiH $702/9 Ssaupeieded oo0'o0ss payaia Jaryd Aouasiawy | 0} uonuaye jelads ym ap . 74M
°
-
€@07/L
4210
-
000‘00T$
sey
3!
34}
aunsua
‘uoNisod
P ayijo say | 7g ssauparedaig “\ualjisas ase sa z
SVINH
WINS
payerq]
Ajjesquad
‘ajqissa22e
JOU 2 Ul 49}U39 Buljood
Alepuosas auo 3seaj 3e Ajquap}
sstejusa *suondo
das ‘sjueis uonevodsues} ayeusaye 10 ysuel}
$202/9
ssaupasedaid
000‘00s$
EPMO
ssuodseu
Buyjoo2
pue
s18ya4s
Suisn
ajqissaoze
si
pue
Dy
ayesado
96 9 oT si payaya yaiyd Aouasiawy | 0} uoQUaye jelsads yum TAM
.
-
€20%/L
43410
-
000‘00T$
,
01
4amod
Aqpue}s
azelidosdde
aYyIjO a2 | 7B Ssaupaledaig ‘Jualyisad aye saiyoey
SVWH
VIN34
5
sey
(Ja}UaD
AUNWWOD)
Je29109 yey} aunsug
491U82 Suljoo9 ay) yey) asnsuq

0L-8
LNDLLDINNOD ‘GYOsuaLYM,
XINNV 3LVGdN NV1d NOILVSILLIA GYVZVH
(paquawajdu!
qual|isad
ul
IsaAu]
yonajsuod
pue
juawajduy]
£202/9
WIS$
spaloid
-
JO
sease
UO
snd0j
1eEjndIWed
Jaye
MUO:
JOM
D190,
se
uane
‘saduanbasuod
80T
9
8T
uunIpelN,
-¥202/L
2
.
aS
-
o00‘00s$
SYHIOM
INGNd
jeunyonaas
uum
“fanay
eas
Suis
YM
OTIM
dio
jedinnuny
Buronpa.
Aq
sysi
“spools .
: uonvajo1g | saseasou! a8ueyo ayeuj> _
06
9
st
Sane
-
€Z202/L
MINH
NINES
WTS
urejdpooj4
0}
UOISIaAUOD
YUM
saliadoid
“spoop. jeyseo> at in ace
%
spafoig
AWN
|
saseasou!
a8ueys
ayew|>
i
L£202/9
VINH
o0o‘ooss
“
Se
Yons
‘ajqesaujna
Ajiejnoied
9gT
8
LT
ysl
.
1
.
Jamas
°g
J8IEM
sajyemaysem,
se
uaa
‘saduanbasuod
84M
~p0z/L
VSS
“AYSMD
-
000‘00T$
Busiem
pue
sonijiqeaujna
soy}
UO
snd04
dYIDads
nie yum pajoosdpooy Ajayenbape aie
pue samod Aouadiawe 3uij28uU0d
40} poyjaw 2 aney suole}s
jagpn:
“
wawaseual
asuodsay
|
saseesou!
aSueys
ajzewj>
“seaie
te
|.
£
€T
|
wnipaw
scoz/9
.
dons
is
.
doo'ses
ss
Wnusisaes
Anuasiawy
se
uana
‘saauanbasuo>
paezey
pooy
jeyseoo
ui
susis
|
74M
“Wd2} “aynod ssaiZa a|3uis
puny
aouayisey
0}
suoneyjersul
adid/yanino
2072/9
syaloig
quawidojanap
yey}
pue
-
vIt
9
6T
|
wipe
ayewll|d
4330
Wts<
SOM
214d
pue
‘Bursejinsai
‘uoenaja
peor
|
94M.
- €202/L ‘ + feanjon.3s Spooy Suynp ajqisseane Bulpnjoul peoy poo suaulpied
*d¥ais“dI9LO1
aie
Sa2IAJas
pue
ajdoad
.
‘
IP.
yey}
aunsua
0}
s1OpI4409
lag

TLS
LNDLLDINNOD ‘GYOsaLVM
XANNV 3LVGdN NV1d NOILWOLLIN GYVZVH
SaSeaJOUI BBUeYD S}EUI|D
“JOALY DURIN pue aioys dy} Sudje
. 1eoWo se uana ‘saouanbasuoa
8202/9 000’0S$ spafloig $a}e1 UOIsOJd YsIy Sulduaiadxe
06 8T | wnipen -S202/L Seouncse'VJa19 -000'Sz$ taneous Jeanqonijs nd ones wera Sea1E 104 SUOIINJOS AyQUAp! 0} Sram
uoisosa pue pooy aonpay | 4230 19 pue voUID Yam Jeuted
*ua} “UOIeAS|S PeOs
U0} BY} JAA0 Juallisad pue ‘Aemysy e Jo uoljonsysu0o
$1 S40pl1J09 Sugje | ‘Mol jep!y aAouduu! 0} UO!}e103Sa1
8202/9 : ais] o00‘os$ ikaed spafoig quawidojanap yey} pue puod Suipnjou! suonjnjos
9£ 6T | wnipeln -§zoz/Z | ,. ‘AMIN/VWON -000'Sz$ pewela J1uD Jeanyonaas spoo}s Suuunp ajqissao2e algissod ym uoNeyS BUOAS||IAL vLdM
SPUN UOIMIWOG 24330 2240 aie sadiAlas pue ajdoad 0} ssaade Arepuodas anosdwit
}eY} ainsua 0} ssopisod | 0} UO!NIOs e AyUAp! 0} UOIUILWOG
qualyisad ul ysanu| pue d33q 19 yum Jauyed
~ "Uday
Buo] ay} 180 quarlisau
puny aouayisay 51 S4opiii0> Buo|e “yoo.g 4a8ua4
06 st | wnpaw ; ped _ sreuuin d33g | ane S10 21IaNd lemonna coutnnp a raiesonve 1e Peo IIH SUN J Suonzes | ETsM
tdW4LS ‘dIDLOT ale saoialas pue ajdoad ayeAgje 4o/pue SUYSA[Nd ssejday
jualjisad
ul
saul
“way
Buo| ay} 4800 uarisad “ease ON ea,
puns souayisay S} SAOP14109 Bugje BY} 10j ssouBa Suljeurwja pue
bad T spaloig quawdojanap jeu} pue Buipooy Aq Ho nd Bulaq peos ay}
SL ST | wipe . ee / ayeuttd 33d : woe SIOM NGNd Jean