Representative Town Regular Meeting Agenda (PDF)
agenda center agenda
| Board/Commission | Representative Town Meeting (RTM) |
|---|---|
| Meeting Date | August 01, 2022 |
| Pages | 46 |
| File Size | 2.4 MB |
| OCR Status | Searchable (OCR processed) |
| Source URL | Original |
Document Preview
Full Text (OCR Extracted)
PHONE: 860-442-0553
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
www.waterfordct.org
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
n7
02
AGENDA =
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING cS
REGULAR MEETING eS
Monday, August 1, 2022 =
7:00pm — Waterford Town Hall “
. . G2
Auditorium ie
od
wd
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
To consider and act upon the minutes of the June 6, 2022 Regular Meeting.
Correspondence ;
Public Comment
Committee reports and referrals
. Appointee & Liaison updates
. Transaction of Business on the Call;
4. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Municipal Complex
Building Committee to dissolve the committee, as the project is complete.
2. To consider and act upon a request from Kim Allen, Director of Finance, to
approve a fund name change from Waterford Community Activities
Fund to Waterford Community Activities & Program Fund to ensure
transparency.
3. To consider and act upon a gift, per Waterford Ordinance 3.05.030
(Contributed Gifts Fund), from the Gardiner Family Foundation in the
amount of $15,000 to Waterford Youth & Family Services.
4. To consider and act upon a motion to approve the funds necessary to
implement the Non-Union Management Professional wages as submitted
5. To consider and act upon two resident appointments to the Ad Hoc Energy
Task Force.
6. To consider and act upon two RTM Member appointments to the Ad Hoc
Energy Task Force.
|. New Business
J. Adjournment
roanmoogp
RIPTEEN ROPE PERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
PHONE: 860-442-0853
www.waterfordct org
MINUTES I
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING ’
Regular Meeting,
June 6, 2022
RTM Moderator Paul Goldstein called the June 6, 2022 Regular Meeting of the Representative Town
Meeting to order at 7:01 P.M.
PLEDGE-OF- ALLEGIANCE.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Greg Attanasio, Michael Bono, Mary Childs, Timothy Condon, Thomas J.. Dembek, Susan
Driscoll, Timothy Floravanti, Steven Garvin, Nicholas Gauthier, Kevin Girard, Paul Goldstein, Kristen
Gonzalez, Ryan Healy, Richard Holmes, Jennifer Kohl, Paul Konstantakis, Cheryl Larder, Richard Muckle,
Ted Olynciw, Dan Radin, Michael Rocchetti, Danielle Steward-Gelinas, David. Sugrue, David Welch,
ABSENT: Jennifer Bracciale. ,
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT: First Selectman RobertJ Brule; Selectwoman Jody Nazarchyk.
EX-OFFICIO. MEMBERS ABSENT; Selectman Elizabeth Sabilia; Chair of the Board of Finance Glenn
Patterson; Chait of the Board. of Education Pat Fedor,
ALSO PRESENT: Town Clerk David L. Campo; Town Attorney Nicholas Kepple; Director of Finance Kim
Allen. .
AGENDA ITEM C ~April 4, 2022 Minutes, May 2, 2022 Mihutes & the May 11, 2022. Minutes.
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Gatithier, to address.each set of minutes separately.
MOTION PASSED: 23-0-1 (Attanasio abstained)
MOTION by Radin, seconded by Sugrue; to approve the April 4, 2022 Meeting Minutes with the
follawing correction: The word meeting in the footer should be meetings.
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION by Muckle, seconded by Driscoll, to approve the May 2, 2022 Meeting Minutes.
MOTION by Bono, seconded by Gonzalez to amend the BOE budget approval on page 3 to reflect
abstentions by Fioravanti, Botio, Childs, & Gonzalez:
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION by Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Healy, to add the word abstained within the parenthesis on
page 8, under Police Commission.
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION by Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Sugrue, to amend the minutes on page-9-to reflect:that the
BOE Budget motion was made by Steward-Gelinas and seconded by Rocchetti.
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
1 RTM MEETING MINUTES 06/06/2022
MOTION by Larder, seconded by Driscoll, to amend the minutes on page 9 to reflect that the Current
Year Capital improvement Budget was voted against by Larder.
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Gauthier, to amend the minutes to include the following items
received for the May 2, 2022 meeting as attachments: All recommendations that were received for the
meeting in regard to the Senior Citizen’s Commission appointments, the petition in objection to the Civic
Triangle Upgrade, the petition to reject the Waterford Affordable Housing Plan, and the letter emalied
fram Danielle Steward-Gelinas in regard to the creation of a committee to research increased green
energy and sustainability. (See attachments)
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION PASSED with the amendments: 23-0-1 (Attanasio abstained}
MOTION by Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Driscoll, to accept the May 11, 2022 Meeting Minutes as
presented,
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
CORRESPONDENCE
Moderator Goldstein noted that the following items were received: Letter from Economic Development
Chair Dan Radin (See Attachment}, a summary from RTM Member Ted Olynciw summarizing the Finance
Director 03/18/2022 report along with the report, an audit report, additions to Call {tem 4, BOE
Quarterly Financial report, letter fram RTM Member Cheryl Larder in regard to “Non-Meatings” (See
Attachment). All copies of correspondence may be abtained from the Town Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Resident Isaac Brody, 57 Lamphere Rd, stated his concerns in regard to a short term rental adjacent to
his property,
AGENDA ITEM F
Public Warks Planning & Development Chair Michael Rocchetti stated that he was planning a Meeting in
June.
RTM Member Susan Driscoll reminded chairs that the majority and minority leader should be included
on agenda notifications for standing committee meetings.
CALL ITEM 1 — Public Act 21-29 Opt Qut
PRESENTATION: Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission Greg Massad.
MOTION hy Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Condon, to opt out of Public Act 21-29: Provisions for
Accessory Dwellings.
Discussion ensued
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
CALL ITEM 2 — Southeastern Connecticut Special Response Team Inter-local Agreement
PRESENTATION: Lieutenant Nicole VanOverloop, Detective Raymond Carroll
MOTION by Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Driscoll, to approve an inter-local agreement entitled
“Southeastern Connecticut Special Response Team” and authorize the First Selectman to sign on the
town’s behalf, pending the approval of the Town Attorney as to form. (See Attachment)
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
2 RTM MEETING MINUTES 06/06/2022
CALL ITEM 3 ~ Oil Tank at Eugene O’Neill
PRESENTATION: Director of Public Works Gary Schneider
MOTION by Sugrue, seconded by Dembek, to approve a recommendation from the Board of Finance for
an appropriation in the amount of $10,000 from Capital and Non-Recurring undesignated line #205-
31520 for a new oil tank installation at Eugene O’Neifl.
Brief discussion ensued.
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Condon to amend the motion to read as follows: To approve a
recommendation from the Board of Finance for an emergency appropriation for a new project in the
amount of $10,000 from Capital and Non-Recurring undesignated line #205-31520 for a temporary oil
tank installation to remediate a tank failure at the Eugene O'Neill Mansion.
MOTION TO AMEND PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
CALL ITEM 4: Southwest School Underground Tank
PRESENTATION: Director of Public Works Gary Schneider
MOTION hy Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Dembek, to approve a recommendation from the Board of
Finance for an appropriation in the amount of $155,000 from the Capital Non-Recurring line #205-
31520 (Undesignated Fund Balance) for the Southwest School Underground Tank Removal/Closure.
Discussion ensued.
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Gonzalez to amend the motion to add “for a new project” after
appropriation.
MOTION TO AMEND PASSED; Unanimous
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION by Olynciw, seconded by Garvin, to designate the above motion as “Emergency Legislation”,
waiving the 15-day waiting period.
MOTION PASSED: 22-2-0 (Larder, Radin opposed)
CALL ITEM 5: Resurface of Roads
PRESENTATION; Director of Public Works Gary Schneider,
MOTION by Dembek, seconded by Rocchetti, to approve a recommendation from the Board of Finance
for an appropriation in the amount of $1,705,358 from the Capital Non-Recurring undesignated line
#205-31520 to resurface the fallowing roads: Lakes Pond Road, Butlertown Road, Daniels Avenue,
Niantic River Road (partial), and Gardiner’s Wood Road.
Discussion ensued.
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION by Olynciw, seconded by Garvin, to designate the above motion as “Emergency Legislation”,
waiving the 15-day waiting period.
MOTION PASSED: 21-3-0 (Attanasio, Larder, Radin opposed)
CALL ITEM 6 ~ Celf Phone Tower
PASSED over with no action.
3 RTM MEETING MINUTES 06/06/2022
NEW BUSINESS:
MOTION by Dembek, seconded by Rocchetti, to refer the review of the Waterford Cade of Ordinances,
Chapter 2.36 ~ Volunteer Firefighters incentive Program to the Public Protection and Safety Standing
Committee of the RTM.
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
MOTION by Steward Gelinas, seconded by Rocchetti, to establish an Ad Hoc Energy Task Force with the
following charge: 1. Reviewing audits of consumption. 2. Identify any data needs based on those audits.
3. Address the energy policy of the town. The make-up would be as follows: 2 members of the RTM, 1
member of the BOF, 1 member of the BOE, 1 member of the BOS, and 2 residents of the town. The
committee would issue a report six months after being established. The committee would be revisited
or sundown on 12/04/2023,
Lengthy discussion ensued.
Representative Bono requested a friendly amendment to refer to the “residents” as electors.
Steward-Gelinas and Rocchetti accepted.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Bono, Childs, Condon, Dembek, Garvin, Gauthier, Girard, Goldstein, Gonzalez, Healy,
Holmes, Kohl, Konstantakis, Muckle, Olynciw, Radin, Rocchetti, Steward-Gelinas, Sugrue, Welch.
VOTING AGAINST: Attanasio.
ABSTAINED: Driscoll, Fioravanti, Larder.
MOTION PASSED: 20-1-3
Representative Radin referenced the letter (See attachment) from the Economic Development
Commission asking that the RTM create an Ad Hoc Economic Strategy Task Force Special Committee to
initiate a Waterford economic development strategy that works for our community to create legislation
to achieve the EDC defined goals.
MOTION by Radin, seconded by Driscoll, to refer the matter to the Legislation and Administration
Standing Committee of the RTM for further review,
Lengthy Discussion ensued,
A friendly amendment was accepted to change the motion to ask the Legislation & Administration
Standing Committee to review of The Waterford Cade of Ordinances, Chapter 2.56 — Economic
Development Commission.
MOTION by Muckle, seconded by Healy, to move the question.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Attanasio, Bono, Condon, Demhek, Driscoll, Fioravanti, Garvin, Girard, Goldstein,
Healy, Holmes, Kohl, Konstantakis, Muckle, Olynciw, Radin, Rocchetti, Steward-Gelinas, Sugrue, Welch.
VOTING AGAINST: Childs, Gauthier, Gonzalez, Larder.
MOTION TO MOVE PASSED: 20-4-0
VOTING IN FAVOR of original motion with friendly amendment: Attanasio, Bono, Childs, Condon,
Driscoll, Fioravanti, Gauthier, Gonzalez, Kohl, Konstantakis, Larder, Olynciw, Radin, Sugrue.
VOTING AGAINST: Dembek, Garvin, Goldstein, Healy, Holmes, Muckle, Rocchetti, Steward-Gelinas,
Welch.
ABSTAINED: Girard
MOTION PASSED: 14-9-1
MOTION by Radin, seconded by Gauthier, in reference to Helen Kwasniewski’s May 9" letter, to refer to
the Legislation and Administration Standing Committee the subject of how the RTM considers
recommendations for committee assignments.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Attanasio, Bono, Childs, Condon, Driscoll, Fioravanti, Garvin, Gauthier, Gonzalez,
Kohi, Konstantakis, Larder, Olynciw, Radin, Sugrue.
4 RTM MEETING MINUTES 06/06/2022
VOTING AGAINST: Dembek, Girard, Goldstein, Healy, Holmes, Muckle, Rocchetti,
Welch.
MOTION PASSED: 15-9-0
Steward-Gelinas,
MOTION by Rocchetti, seconded by Sugrue, to adjourn at 9:49 P.M.
MOTION PASSED: Unanimous
Respectfully submitted,
David L. Campo, CCTC
Waterford Town Clerk
5 RTM MEETING MINUTES 06/06/2022
WATERFORD REPUBLICAN TOWN COMMITTEE
P.O. Box 671
Waterford, CT 06385
Mr.David Campo oe
Waterford Town Clerk eS
15 Rope Ferry Road | 68
Waterford, CT 06385 vin ~
oo
ae
oe
April 28, 2022 &?
nN:
wf
Dear Dave,
Please be informed that the Waterford Republican Town Committee endorsed Jody
Nazarchyk to serve on the Senior Citizens Commission for the April 4, 2022 to April 7, 2025
term.
The Waterford Republican Town Committee respectfully requests that the Representative Town
Meeting place in nomination at its meetirig on May 2, 2022 the name of Jody Nazarchyk for a
new term on the Senior Citizens Commission.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this request.
Sincerely yours,
Tali Maidelis
WRTC, Chairman
Ce: Paul Goldstein
RTM, Moderator
Danielle Steward-Gelinas
RTM, Majority Leader
gle
WATERFORD DEMOCRATIC TOWN COMMITTEE
P.O. Box 979 * Waterford, CT * 96385
Apuil 27,2022: S
Paul Goldstein 8
Moderator, RTM a »
13 Rope Ferry Rd. i rea)
Waterford, CT 06385 -9
RE; Senior Citizens Commission Appointinents ~
Deéar Moderator Goldstein,
The Waterford Democratic Town Commiittee-voted untanimously-to support the nomination of
the following individuals for appointment to the Senior Citizens Commission to fill the vacancies
now open for the 04/04/22 — 04/07/25 ahd 04/06/20 — 04/03/23 terns.
Daniel Rissi, MD Ada Filippetti
367 Glenwood Avenue Ext. 11 Hillcrest Drive
Waterford, CT 06385 Waterford, CT 06385
didr?2@hetmail.com Hlipali@aol.com
860-235-9944 860-460-7394
The Waterford DTC believes that both of these individuals would prove to be capable, qualified
and active participants if granted the opportunity to sérve. (Brief bios are attached.) We strongly
recommend that.the Representative Town Meeting appoint Dr. Rissi and.Ms Filippetti to-fill the
‘current vacancies.on the Senior Citizens Commission.
Thank you for your consideration of this maiter.
Sincerely,
Cathe, Porrard cae
Catherine Barnard
Chair, Waterford DTC
ce: Dave Campo, Town Clerk
encl: Rissi/Filippetti bios
Petition:
Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade — Removal of Funding
April 10, 2022
Dear members of the RTM, First Selectmen, and the Board of Finance,
This petition is ta request the Town of Waterford RTM, Board of Selectman, and the Board of Finance
remove funding for the Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade in its entirety,
With the cost of living, taxes, insurance and inflation skyrocketing, it is imperative that any and all
funding for this Capital improvement be removed from this year’s and any or all future budget
proposal(s) and or allocations(s),
“Removing this Turiding fromthe Town of Waterford-budget will help reduce and or stabilize property
taxes, which in turn benefits all Waterford residents and businesses.
Sincerely, _
Concerned residents
Petition: Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade ~ Removal of Funding
April 10, 2022
HE THHY 2-4
Petition:
Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade ~ Removal of Funding
April 10, 2022
Name
Address
Que. bro
Jobe
nyo nit
hy,
Meth: Corer
oe
an Zone
uence
g Cluakey hone Neher We
Well CF LBB
v7] Qiao Pane Qaerc hy CT Goeth
73 Old Glhater Bd Quaker Hill, Cr OSE
93 oD Gletsrr RB) Butler fA, CT Oey
5 Laurel Glen Kd Quaker tit CT 0637S”
YU Laut| Her 2A que? Wt, CT 39S
YH Lawe Gur kd water ll cr 375
g Laurel Glen rd Quaker Hill £7
3 level Glen & Quler |fal OF BGs7S
7s Ve GE
2 Quay Weck CF LH
Petition: Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade — Removal of Funding
April 10, 2022
Petition:
Town of Waterford Civic Tria: iangle Upgrade ~ Removal of Fundin ing
April 16, 2022
Name Address
Delorain Wiseman 94 High Lege bie
Dowll Uf Pelt 29 tickory LG Na
__ J Seorttherte Ch / Ssawe CW Erg ¢wrs Dayve
o . Lod ae 33 Osweeatche kA
4. en 77 Sag td BD
Cathy, ae i 35° Peppoobes Ra, fe!
ti £ Gl 33 Dimmock Ke Wolufat
ae
| 9 gh kage f ( PP sy uu t{s |
Guat G7 Bcp2 (< loth aie po ls .
Bal ffeveth 16 FM Ave.
HE THY o- AVH CCU
Petition: Town of Waterfor ‘ord Civic Triangle Upgrade — Remov: val of Funding
April 10, 2022
Petition:
Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade - Removal of Funding
April 10, 20: ; , .
sa ALF by Address E Comey Cus
Tale W U7 Stneheidits Davi
Huats J. Shannon Webecfoed jo
ve A. UecVEO <A B wey sea) <
WITFY? or,
Rosert J. Berreemoae G LAmPHERE Road, WA remot) cr
ZL Hecker Kone, WoterGed , CT
Stephanie Yuido
1S Middle St Waterford , C17
Jou Sapig S big Se Uahe five oT
wht Batwoslrs” 36 Gothen Rd Wedertoce) CT
ae vB Cgne 1) 4iupa Ave WATER Rep CT
Way Leomcce 310 Besion feer Wp. vow (SZ werreaeo CT,
enw Nae
Sel, Sao ra LA,
BS MIM2OLE Dl. WROD CZ
Ls High 1G As. Da, Warten Faas or
Kw Samerey AR Heys Pew Da Wale faved C7
Robot Firmen 2 EAST what eO Widehr,
Dany Qusgrews Becky 8 Seventh dee Otel O- Mga KE
Deowlas ba Ht & Seventa thre eke rfoey CT 06385—
§uThy Ra 4 Ahgk Bdge Dt rpro, Clg
Robert Darling ge Spitad RID Wolerkad oo8 Rs
Levin Sok I Vanek Ave UsteSad ogses
Tava Smith BL Danels Ave » Waktard C7 0b 36F
Petition: Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade — Removal of Funding
Aprif 10, 2022
Petition:
Name
2 AN Aveque, WaterRrl OF agay
Ht 2202
ty
HESTHY eH AS
Petition: Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade ~ Removal of Funding
April 10, 2022
Petition:
Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade — Removal of Funding
April 10, 2022
Name. Address
Racwarnpo ©, KV EHLEWING 3%. R REA View TES.
Petition: Town of Waterford Civic Triangle Upgrade — Removal of Funding
April 10, 2022
Petition:
Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan — Petition to Reject MAY 09 2022
April 10, 2022 i Planning & Development
Town of Waterford, CT
Dear members of the RTM, the First Selectmen, and Planning and Zoning,
This petition is to request the Town of Waterford RTM, Board of Selectman, and Planning and Zoning
reject in its entirety the proposed Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan and to specifically remove
the Southwest School buildings, property and surrounding zones / areas from this proposal and or any
future proposals.
Southwest School is situated in an area of high density housing. It is also adjacent to wetlands and
located in close proximity to the Niantic River. The property is also one of the few remaining town-
owned open spaces in this Immediate area.
Housing development in this zone will significantly impact the Niantic River estuary (i.e. run-off, storm
water discharge, oil from vehicles, use of fertilizers and other chemicals), along with the wetlands and
marshes that support it. This is also an area that supports various wildlife including migratory birds, It
should be removed from the Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan immediately.
In addition to the request noted above, the current Affordable Housing Plan as proposed does not ;
promote home ownership or adequately address the issue of property taxes. It is based mostly on
opinion surveys instead of facts/hard data, and these surveys’ findings have not been tested or
corroborated,
It is requested that this Affordable Housing Plan proposal be rejected in its entirety,
Sincerely,
Concerned residents
282
TMS
'
wo
“9
7
cA
N
cos)
Petition: Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan — Petition to Reject
April 10, 2022
443
Draft For PZC Review — September 2021
Enable / Support. Mixed-Use Nodes
Change zoning to encourage or require establishment of walkable,
pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use nodes with a variety of housing options
where indicated in the POCD (public water, public sewer, road capacity,
bus transit, etc.) while maintaining / enhancing the overall “sense of
place”
Residential Densities Plan
Warertord, CT
ny
sete A Taeiieed
sean
Ledtyuct
Nedas
tewirgerve Z
revved satay
(@) arog
lovcereana
my, [Pestle tun
OO) frcceun tore
we” Jicey
SUI tase Haye wn SCe HS
J Meee wwe Deaaty te pe Facies
{ SreGenty hooratil Ama petsen
I Nadie demrvty Urrldenlsd* Tu pre Ave
1a Mibrr oslo Sey lady
Patten dnp Ae
WR 401 Dele tet tonite
Be eecttvar deans .
{LE tte eh dere
\. Rhee dni falpes nits
31
Draft For PZC Review ~ September 2021
‘4.4.4 . \dentify Other Potential Housing Opportunity Areas -
* Consider Identifying specific areas in Waterford which might be eligible
for consideration for higher density residential development
* Consider discouraging housing in areas with factors potentially not
supporting housing options
© Consider encouraging housing in areas with factors potentially
supporting housing options
Factors Potentially Supportive Factors Potentially Not Supportive
Of Housing Optlans Of Housing Options
* Community nodes * Public water supply watersheds
* — Business proximity * Wetlands
* Sus routes e = =©Watercourses
«= Public sewer © = Floodplains
* = Public water * Steep slopes
Factors Potentially
“CT
a
Supporting Holsing Options re Factors Potantitily Not
YL Supporting Rousing Options
aon ZC
32
Petition: :
Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan — Petition to Reject
April 10, 2022
eer 5 f Address & CAWwTRY Coo Ve) Ape
Cpey buns LATER POR
HaghL, Shounen I Weterford a
—Traar A. Ne¥ERSot g ~papsend) OV"
reaS aa : \WITFP ; aaa @o3se?
Stephanie, Gutdo IS Middle/oh Wwaterferd, CT
Set Sapa : S thegl sf (Ueseberdorrcd -
Dosh Bexoul 36, Usorren Rj Walecte<d CT
Jeg uiva Lemony 2 Zo linet AVE wareahan poses
zip Bysren Pose BD. Weratroto cr.
Be WUE DM WIRE XC.
Ds Hel, Midge Da. Wwartentond OF
\WAnne
(ad HAGE
Robart Firma 3 IZ EaST whet 2 Wate fers or
Mad KareBedc 7 Hie Pupse De. unrmseg oh
Sora Chop 5 th\\top Terrace wWintd CT
Dawn Ruggien Brcls € Serunths tre Wale Lor an33e”
Bseventr Be water bew Cr 6 38T
, “Deeg Bact : ; °
Sua Tie eman AY Megk Rathye Be. Wataprd
Ro bert Darling | SY Sethead Red wateBurd GA -
Petition: Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan ~ Petition to Reject
April 10, 2022
Petition:
Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan ~ Petition to Reject
April 10, 2022
Name Address ‘
Levin Sod 61 Vaniels he. ‘ WateSard CY 06386
Tara Smith G\ Oanels Pre Walktrtor d, C6 60305.
Pool Kee 2 ATM Ave “2, Woterbord ,CT 03
38
Doe BRYNESZ "(aK Ade! CIATROKO
il ite (BAM foe.
Petition: Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan — Petition to Reject
April 10, 2022
Petition:
Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan — Petition to Reject
April 10, 2022
Address
Name
Ricmarp FE. Kueacewwo 2. Y Sea view TER,
Petition; Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan — Petition to Reject
April 10, 2022
Petition:
Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan— Petition to Reject
April 10, 20
Name WZ hfe Address 13 mere Vw Ter rack
Acbect Fasgialen ; LirAterfe cd
Petition:
Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan ~ Petition to Reject
Aprit 10,2022,
Name ZZ. Address /5 ~¢a. Video Tan rat k—
harry eT ; watemford
Petition: Town of Waterford Affordable Housing Plan — Petition to Reject
April 10, 2022
David Campo
LASS Rasaissesenennnnennennensnnsnene=n
From: Danielle Gelinas <steward-gelinas@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: . Monday, May 2, 2022 10:33 AM
To:
David Campo; MICHAEL ROCCHETTI; Paul Goldstein; Kevin Girard
Subject: Correspondence
Please include as correspondence for tonight's meeting (5/2/22)
The events regarding the use of natural gas at two town buildings over the past few weeks has brought
forward concerns about the use of green energy and sustainability in Waterford. Abby Piersall, in the past, has
provided an outline for a comprehensive evaluation of sustainability opportunities in Waterford. In recent
conversations with her, a committee designed to address these concerns would be a beneficial addition to
support the Town’s efforts. We propose an Ad Hoc committee be formed to research a holistic,
toward increased green energy and sustainability. It is critical that we are proactive rather than
efforts moving forward,
long term plan
reactive in our
As we are about to embark on our budget meetings, we anticipate discussion regarding the charge,
composition and name of this Ad Hoc committee be placed on the agenda for our June meeting.
Respectfully,
Danielle Steward-Gelinas
Paul Goldstein
Michael Rocchetti
Kevin Girard
ORY 2- AYN @202
La
WHEREAS, Section 7-148 co of the Statutes of the State of Connecticut authorizes
municipalities to enter into Interlocal agreements; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned muniolpalities find that the deployment of a highly tralned and
skilled special response team coupled with a crisis negotiation team can substantially reduce the
tisk of injury or loss of life to citizens, police officers, criminal suspects and persons in orlsis; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned municipalities recognize the inherent manpower and training
demands associated with special response and erisis negotiation teams and agree that it is in the best
interest of the participating nunicipalities to share manpower, resources, and equipment associated
with special law enforcement responses; aud
WHEREAS, the undersigned municipalitiés find that an interlocal agreement is beneficial in
order to protect the safety and well-being of the citizens of the respective municipalities: and
WHEREAS, the undersigned municipalities wish to cooperate on providing police services and
in pursuing grants and saising monies to obtain capital resources in furtherance of these goals
under the teuns of this agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned municipalities, acting by their respective chief executive
officers, duly authorized, mutually agree, pursuant to this Interlocal agreement (hereafter,
“Agreement") to establish the Southeastern Connecticut Speclal Response Team (hereafter
"SCSRT") in accordance with the following: .
ARTICLE ONE: PROVISION OF PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT
‘. The chief executive officers of the undersigned municipalities hereby delegate to the chiefs
of police of their respective muntoipalities the authority to determine when the provision of
police personnel and equipment bast serves the purposes of this agreement,
2, Tho participating chiefs, hereinafter collectively designated and referred to as the "Board",
shall meet periodically as determined by the needs of the Unit, but at least once per year, and
each Chief of Police shall have an equal vote on decisions affecting the administration of the
SCSRT.
3. The chiets of police, collectively, as the decision-making authority, have the responsibility
for the coordination of grant applications and the administration of funding awards and other
initiatlves.
SCSRT «Interlocal Agreement Page | of 6
4. The Board anticipates and agroes to male resources available for at feast one full of partial
deployment per quarter of personnel and equipment pursuant to this agreement for the
duration of this agreement. Additional deployments are authorized, without further action,
by the mutual consent of the participating municipalities.
5. During the deployment of’ personnel and equipment pursuant to this agreement, the
officers so deployed shall be deemed members of their respective departments acting to
further the goals of this agreement and each shall have the same powers, duties, privileges
and immunities ag are conferred on the police officers of the municipality in whose
Jurisdiction the Unit or any of its officers is operating,
6. Durlng a SCSRT emergency deployment, it is expected that the undersigned
municipalities shall provide at a minitaum the following quantity of personnel and
equipment;
One or more specially wained and equipped police officers and one
or more mazked and/or unmarked polive vehicles.
7. A muntoipality may elect not to participate in a deployment if ithas 4 good faith reason to do
80, However, each municipality, in Its discretion, may determine the extent of its
participation in any deployment through the specific assignment of peisonne! and equipment,
8, The resources or facilities that are assisting the requesting Agency shall be under the immediate
command of a supervising officer designated by the assisting Agency, Such supervising officer
shall be under the direct supervision and command of the requesting Agetioy,
9. The Board shall appoint collectively a supervisor from each ofthe patticipating departments
to function as the SCSRT Teain Commanders, The Team Commanders must at least hold
the rank of sergeant In his/her department, The Board acknowledges appointment of Unit
Commanders Is necessary to maiatain continuity of the unit and its members especially in
the case of an emergency deployment. It will be preferable that the Team Commanders have
experience and training in the area of tactical command. The Team Commanders shat! have
the authority to appoint assistant team feaders as necessary,
10. The SCSRT Commander will act as the Ulaison between the departments for all
activities of the unit,
{1. During each full deployment, the host municipality, which is the municipality tequesting the
services, shall make every effort to provide a sergeant or higher-ranicdng officer to coordinate
operations with the SCSRT Team Commander while in the field,
11. The tequest for specialty equipment such as night vision, communtoation equipment, robotic
equipment and others not listed, will be considered on an individual basis by the lending
agency Ifa full deployment is not requested, The holder of such equipment may elect to send
an officer with such equipment to ensure safe and proper usage of such equipment during a
deployment. : .
SCSRT ~ Interlacal Agreement Page 2 of 6
ARTICLE TWO; DUTIES OF PERSONNEL
4,
» The Chief of Police or designee in the host municipality shall retain ultimate responsibility for
operational decisions and act as incident commander during any operation or team deployment.
Each officer assigned to the SCSRT shall wear the unit's approved uniform,
All custodial arrests or investigations shall be processed in a manner designated by the host
agency,
In the oase of a planned deployment for a warrant service ot other planned event, the host
agency shall prepare and distribute to all participating officers an operations plan for each
deployment of a non-emergency nature,
ARTICLE THREE: REIMBURSEMENT AND LIABILITY
1,
Each participating municipality agrees that it shall be responsible for its respective police
department expenses incurred while participating In each deployment, whether that
imunicipality's equipment and personnel was operating within or outside its own jurisdiction,
Any entitlement to reimbursement, except ag stated herein, is hereby waived by the chief
executive officer of each municipality that is a party to this agreement. Such expenses may
include, but are not limited to:
a) The actual payroll (including overtime) cost to the municipalities of all personnel
assigned;
b) The replacement cost of all equipment lost, destroyed or made unavailable for
further service as aresult of proper use in a SCSRT deployment, Nothing in this
section waives a muniolpality’s right ta seek reimbursement for equipment lost or
destroyed negligently, recklessly, willfully, or purposefully.
c) Fuel and maintenance for police vehicles;
d) The cost of repairing damaged equipment;
e) Awards for death, disability or injury to personnel arising as a result of services
provided pursuant to this agreement to the extent that such awards exceed
Worker's Compensation coverage;
f) Worker's Compensation claims as set forth in C.G.8, 31-275, et soq.;
g) Survivor's benefits as set forth in C,G.8, 7-323,
SCSRT ~futerlocal Agraemont Page 3 of 6
2, Ih the event outside funding becomes available to pay for the expenses of the municipalities
operating under this agreement, such finds shall be allocated among the. participating
municipalities on a proportional cost basis agreed to in advance, This does not include
subrogation, The proportional cost basis may be adjusted to each deployment or initlative
depending on the location of the host, number of personnel assigned to the deployment by
each agency, ete,
3, The services performed under this agreement shall be deemed for public and governmental
purposes, and all immnuities from liability enjoyed by the local government within {ts
boundaries shall extend to its participation under this agreement outside its boundaries.
4, Each municipality shall indemnify and hold hatmless the other municipalities to this
agreement fiom all claims, including, but not limited to, third party claims, for property
damage or personal injury (including death) which may arise out of and be attributable to a
municipalliy or to the actions of those acting on behalf of each municipality, Bach town shall
be liable only for their own percentage of negligence as determined by the courts of ajury,
ARTICLE FOUR: APPOINTMENT OF A DEPOSITORY MUNICIPALITY, PURSUIT
OF REGIONAL GRANT INITIATIVES, AND REVENUE SHARING/USAGE
1, Appointment of a Depository Municipality; Functions of Depository Municipality
a) The Board of SCSRT shall mutually select a depository municipality from one of the
members of SC&RT which shall receive and hold In trust for SCSRT all montes obtained
by SCSRT fiom grants or other sources, Said monies shall be held ina special revenue
account (hereafter, the "SCSRT Joint Account") of an account with {ike budgetary
petinissions that will allow the convenient use of said funds as needed by SCSRT. The
depository municipality agrees, in flurtherance of the goals of this agreement, to pass any
ordinance or resolution required by its own municipal Charter ia order to effectuate the
oveation of sald SCSRT Joint Account, '
b) Upon a request from any member municipality, the depository munielpality shall provide
an-accounting of all funds contained in the SCSRT Joint Account,
@) Upon an affirmative majority vote of the member muntelpalities, the depository
municipality may be changed. Upon a vate to change the depository municipality, the
psior depository municipality shall, within 60 days of sald vote, turn over all funds and
provide a full accounting to the successor depository munieipality,
d) In the event that a depository municipality withdraws from SCSRT ot no longer wishes
to serve in sald capacity, a successor depository municipality shall be appointed by the
members of SCSRT, At such time, the prior depository municipality shall, within 60
days of said appointment, turn over all funds and equipment purchased with funds fiom
the Shared Revenue Account to the successor municipality, The prior depository
inunicipafity shall, within 60 days, provide a full accounting, and an itemized list of
transferred equipment to the successor depository municipality,
SCSRT «Interlocal Agreement : Page 4 of 6
2, Pursuit of Regional Grant Initiatives, Development of Capital Goals
a)
)
Itshall be an essential function and purpose of SCSRT to pursue grants and’ other
initiatives to xalse monies in order to purchase capital resources to further the purposes of
this agreement.
From time to time, and as necessary, SCSRT shall meet to develop a short-term G year)
and {ong term (5-year) capital plan for the SCSRT. The monies raised pursuant to this
agreement shall be utilized to further the capital goals set by SCSRT.
The Board shall designate a member of a participating agency with the responsibility of
researohing and applying for grants to further the acquisitions of equipment, training and/or
reimbursement money,
3, Revenue Sharing
4)
1)
8)
d)
¢)
All revenue raised and remitted to the SCSRT Jolnt Acnount shall be shared and used for
the collaborative and Joint purposes of the SCSRT. Nothing in this provision shall be
conatiued to conflict with or alter the reimbursement or funding provisions of Astiole Ml
regarding deployments,
Expenditures from the SCSRT Joint Account of $500 or less can be made by the
Team Commander, without prior approval, All expenditures greater than $500 from
the SCSRT Joint Account shall require the unanimous vote of all SCSRT member
municipalities in writing via electronic mail (e-mail),
Any property obtained with funds from the SCSRT Joint Account shall be considered
property of the depository munleipality, held for the benefit of itself and all other SCSRT
‘municipalities, No property obtained with monies frow the SCSRT Joint Account or
with finds attributable to said account shall be sold, modified, gifted, or otherwise
transferred without the unanimous vote of all member mupicipalities in writing,
Any depository municipality which misappropriates funds fiom the SCSRT Joint
Account or otherwise disposes of property obtained with SCSRT fAnds in violation of
this seotion shall be Hable to all of the other member municipalities for the loss to SCSRT
and any and all costs, including court costs and attorney's fees, incurred in recovering
said funds or property fiom the depository municipality or any other third party.
Funds from the SCSRT Joint Account ate intended for equipment and services for the
unit and shall not be used to pay salary or overtime to SCSRT members,
ARTICLE FIVE: MISCELLANEOUS
1, The Chief of Police of the municipality providing assistance may, if necessary to protest the
safety and well-being of said municipality, cecall any personne! or equipment provided
pursuant to this agreement.
SCSRT -fttterlocal Agreement Page 3 of 6
2. Each participating jurisdiction ehall have a defined policy regarding the selection process of
potential candidates prior to an officer's appointment to their respective SRT team, Bach
partloipating Jurisdiction agrees to set standards in common SRT categories such as physical
fitness, fireacin proficiency and mandatory training hours, Each Participating agenoy will create
atid enforce a policy to remediate any officer who fails to meet the departments requirements and
standards, up to and including removal from the SRT Team,
3. Withdrawal from this agreement by any inunicipality hereto shall be made by thirty (30) days'
written notice to aif other municipalities but shall uot terminate the agresment among the
remaiaing municipalities,
4. 1f any provision of this agreement shall be unlawful, void, or for any teason unenforceable, then
that provision shall be deemed severable fiom this agreement and shall not affect the validity and
enforceability of any remaining provisions.
§, This Agreement contnins the entire understanding between the parties hereto and supersedes any
and all prior understandings, negotiations, and agreements whether written or otal, between them
respecting the written subject matter, hereof,
6, This Agreement, to the extent permitted herein, shall inuze to the benefit of and be binding upon
the parties hereto and any and all successors and assigns,
7. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed In accordance with the laws and relevant
ordinances and regulations of the State of Connecticut and the participating munfelpalities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as follows:
TOWN OF LEDYARD By;
Fredesic 8, Allyn, Il, Mayor
TOWN OF WATERFORD By:
Robert J. Brule, First Selectman
SCSRT -[nterlocal Agreenient Page 6 of 6
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
PHONE; 860-442-0553
www.waterfordct.org
hs
i)
ma
ern
ca
t
wo
9-May 2022 cs]
==
To: Waterford RTM Moderator, party leaders, unaffiliated representatives rt
Ce: Board of Selectmen
From: Waterford Economic Development Commission
Subject: Statement Concerning Economic Development Commission’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2023 Budget
Waterford Economic Development Commission (EDC) membership has appreciated the town’s focus on
economic development. Several current EDC members were appointed by First Selectman Brule in an effort
to bring new voices to the Commission. A significant portion of the American Rescue Plan funds were
earmarked for EDC programs. We see a developing Waterford economy: vacant storefronts filied, new
housing under construction. But we regret that EDC has played no material role in Waterford’s economic
condition.
Upon instantiation of the current EDC membership in March 2021, members first focused on understanding
the enabling legistation in order to find ways to be effective within its significant constraints, EDC is enabled
by State Statute, “for the promotion and development of economic resources” to:
® Conduct research into economic conditions and trends,
® Make recommendations regarding action to Improve the economic condition,
« Coordinate the activities of, and cooperate with, unofficial bodies organized to promote economic development,
e = Advertise and distribute [media] which will further its purposes, and
« Annually prepare a report of activities and recommendations for improving economic conditions and development,
Upon codifying its charter around this understanding, EDC conducted research into economic development
trends relative to Waterford's condition and recommended an economic gardening approach. EDC made
policy recommendations regarding actions on cannabis and clean energy to improve the economic condition.
EDC attempted to coordinate activities to catalyze new-business formation and to fund capital improvements
to existing businesses, but those programs were canceled. Finally, EDC prepared a year-end report of
activities and recommendations for improving economic conditions and development, in which the central
thesis was, “there is a lack of a cohesive economic development strategy.”
EDC members feel it is time to state that it’s not working. Volunteering time for no results isn’t worthwhile for
EDC members. investing staff resources in EDC incurs opportunity cost. And most importantly, we
acknowledge that, given this context, committing increased funds to EDC might be perceived as a poor
allocation of taxpayers’ money.
In order to forge an effective path forward, EDC recommends that the Commission temporarily pause
regular meetings, following this week's May 2022 meeting. We make this recommendation not because we
no longer believe in Waterford economic development, but rather because we believe that the current
incamation of EDC has been so wholly ineffective, for so long, that a clean slate presents an opportunity to
reimagine, rather than revise.
We recommend that RTM form an Ad Hoc Economic Strategy Task Force, for a term of six months,
consisting of three to five residents plus First Selectman Brule and Planning Director Piersall. This working
group would take on a singular deliverable of co-creating—with the public—a Waterford economic
development strategy that works for our community, All current EDC members offer to participate on this Task
Farce, or in other capacities advising Town leadership on economic opportunities.
At the conclusion of the strategy work, we recommend that RTM and EDC membership craft municipal
enabling legislation to support and reinstantiate Waterford EDC to achieve its defined strategic goals.
We are confident that doing this difficult but necessary work of pausing, aligning, and then rebuilding will yield
far greater economic impact and vibrancy for our community.
Sincerely,
Dan Radin, chair
Waterford Economic Development Commission
June 6,.2022 RED
2022 SUN -6 PH 2: 25
Moderator Goldstein: ”
I was concerned, and continue to have concern regarding the activities of the
RTM on May 2 and 4, 2022. It appeared that you were approached by Town counsel
regarding holding a non-meeting of the body for what was described shortly thereafter
to the RTM members present, prior to the opening of the May 2" RTM budget session,
as.an opportunity for labor counsel to meet with the RTM to discuss the members’ role.
in the approval of union contracts negotiated by labor counsel and the human resources
director. It was suggested that such a gathering was needed because mtich would be
happening in the coming weeks and the RTM meeting scheduled for June 6" was too
far off. You then took an informal poll of those present and vocal in scheduling a “non-
meeting” of the RTM to occur on May 4", prior to the commencement of the May 4th
budget session.
Because the above discussion was held off the record, prior to the opening of the
May 2" RTM meeting, there is no record of it ever occurring. An email was circulated
to the body by the Town. Clerk on May 4", reminding members of the “non-meeting”.
That communication is-also not included in the RTM record.
A “non-meeting” of the RTM was held with labor counsel on May 4", At the
commencement of the “non-meeting” gathering, I asked labor counsel regarding the
legality of our meeting and how it was excluded from Notice or public record by the
Freedom of Information Act. Labor Counsel indicated it was a decision of the body to
have a “non-meeting” and I was referred to-C.G.S. 1-200 below:
Sec, 1-200. (Formerly Sec. 1-18a). Definitions. As used in this chapter, the
following words and phrases shall have the following meanings, except where -
such terns are used in a context which clearly indicates the contrary:
(2) “Meeting” means any hearing or other proceeding of a public agency, any
convening or assembly of a quorum of a multimember public agency, and any .
communication by or to a quorum of a multimember public agency, whether in . ,
person or by means of electronic equipment, to discuss of act upon a matter over
which the public agency has supervision, control, jurisdiction or advisory power. _
“Meeting” does not include: Any meeting of a personnel search committee for
executive level employment candidates; any chance meeting, or a social meeting
neither planned nor intended for the purpose of discussing matters relating to
official business; strategy or negotiations with respect to collective
bargaining; .....
I would respectfully disagree that it was a “decision of the body” to have a “on-
meeting” when any such decision was not taken up by the RTM as a body but in an
informal bantering of those present and vocal before the May 2TM meeting was brought.
to order as to what would fit their schedules. The public record is void of any “decision”.
Counsel then distributed a memo to those present entitled “Attorney-Client
Privilege” which included substantive information regarding pending negotiations, not
just a discussion of the RTM members’ “role” in contract approvals. The memo was
collected from the members, no action was taken and no input was provided by the
members present. ,
Again, the minutes of the May 4" are void of any reference to a “non-meeting”
because, presumably by statute, a meeting did not occur per the specific carve out of
disclosure of the same as referenced in C.G.S. 1-200 above.
I have heard the word “transparent” process and government many many times
in the last several months. In my mind, there is nothing more opaque than the activities
of the RTM on May 2"4 and 4", True, I had the opportunity to leave the non-meeting,
and in retrospect I should have.
Now, here we are at June 6" with no executive session planned or any anticipated
action regarding any pending labor matters. Passage of time has not supported the need
for the non-meeting on May 4", Nothing was accomplished by the non-meeting that
could nat have been addressed in a properly noticed executive session. | urge you as
Moderator, and the body as a whole to refrain from holding any further “non-meetings.”
Thank you.
R. Larder
RTM Member, 1* District
bie
PUBLIC
HEALTH
TOWN
OF
WATERFORD
AMERICAN
RESCUE
FUNDS
QUARTERLY
REPORT
April
1,
2022
through
June
30,
2022
1:2
COVID-19
Testing
Wfd-1.2-01
COVID
Test
Kits
1.5
Personal
Protective
Equipment
Wfd-1.5-01
1.7
Other
COVID-19
Public
Health
Expenses
First
Responder
CADlink
Equipment
and
Software
yan
2022 JUL-7 PMI
Wfd-1.7-02
PPE
Supplies
ESO
Fire
RMS
Software
JP
Morgan
CC
(Amazon)
JP
Morgan
CC
(Wal-Mart)
JP
Morgan
CC
(CVS)
SUBTOTAL
Hanger
14
Solutions
LLC
Slate
Pages
LLC
Tactical
Communications
FIRSTNet/AT&T
Mobility
FirstNet
(monthly
service
fee)
Central
Square
Central
Square
ePlus
(Equipment
MDM
License)
SUBTOTAL
ESO
Solutions
through
6/30/22
$
$
$
$
80,570.00
63.75
WA
3,499.84
Ve Ut
Bvod
7,824.40
4,038.72
15,975.57
1,707.20
WI 1
65,076.29
Ae aes
Wn
$
$
$
$
6,021.05
PAGE
1
TOWN OF WATERFORD
AMERICAN
RESCUE
FUNDS
QUARTERLY
REPORT
Encumbered Expended
through through Balance
BUDGET 6/30/22 6/30/22 Available
Wfd-1.7-03
Dispatch
Upgrades
Eaton
§$
26,665.00
SUBTOTAL
$
2.50
26,662.50
1.12
Mental
Health
Services
Wfd-1.12-01
Human
Services.Coordinator
S$
266,101.00
S$
222,845.94
April 1 - June 30, 2022 43,255.06
SUBTOTAL - 43,255.06.
1.14
Other
COVID-19
Public
Health
Services
Wfd-1.14-01
Ledgelight
Health
District
§
55,479.00
$
0.100
SUBTOTAL : $5,478.90.
2:
NEGATIVE
ECONOMIC
IMPACTS
2.32
Small
Business
Economic
Assistance
(General)
Wd-2.32-01
Waterford
Smail
Business
Grants
§
300,000.00
§
228,253.80
The
Day
(Consulting
Services
Bid
Advertisement)
$
-
§
246.20
Brianna
Regine
Visionary
Consulting
5
60,500.00
SUBTOTAL $60,500.00 $ 246.20
2.35.
Aid
to
Tourism,
Travel
or
Hospitality
Wfd-2.35-01
Eugene
O'Neill
Theater
S$
588,765.00
S$
532,117.06
Charles
Pasteryak
Asphalt
Paving
S
-
5S
56,647.94
SUBTOTAL
s$
S$
56,647.94
PAGE 2
5:
AMERICAN
RESCUE
FUNDS
QUARTERLY
REPORT
INFRASTRUCTURE
through through Balance
BUDGET 6/30/22 6/30/22 Available
$ 888,765.00 § 60,500.00 $ 56,894.14 $ 760,370.86
5.5
Clean
Water:
Other
Sewer
Infrastructure
Wfd-5.5-01
Cross
Road
Pump
Station
Upgrade
Wfd-5.5-02
Old
Norwich
Road
Pump
Station
Upgrade
Wfd-5.5-03
|
Gorman
Pump
Station
Controf
Panels
Upgrade
5.14
Drinking
Water:
Storage
Wfd-5.14-01
Fargo
Lane
Water
Tower
Rehab
$
587,650.00
$
163,750.00
$
1,200,000.06
$88,994.79
§
51,381.28
|
37,380.64.
107,850.00
$
55,900.00
107,850.00
S$.
43,999.84
$
15,000.16
S$ 424,273.93
$
461,275.00
AMERICAN
RESCUE
FUNDS
QUARTERLY
REPORT
BUDGET 6/30/22 6/30/22 Available
5,21
Broadband:
Other
Projects
Wfd-5.21-01
Broadband/Secuirty
Upgrades
at.
Pump
Stations
S$
680,322.00
S
674,748.00
ePlus
(security
laptops
maint
contract)
ePlus
(security
laptops)
SUBTOTAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
SUBTOTAL
S$
3,196,372.00
)
§
165,236.08
$
2,701,297
6:
REVENUE
REPLACEMENT
6.1
Wfd-6.1-01
Civic
Triangle
Park
ADA
Revitalization
$
950,000.00
S$
950,000.00
Wfd-6.1-02
Town
GIS
Updates
$
37,500.00
$
.
Tighe&Bond
$
26,071.47
$
11,428.53
SUBTOTAL
S
11,428.53
Wfd-5.21-02
Cyber
Security
$
21,688.00
$
(3,480.00)
ePlus
(security
assessment)
5
-
S
25,168.00
ePlus
(Duo
Subscription}
Consolidated
Computing
(PURE
Maintenance)
PAGE 4
TOWN
OF
WATERFORD
AMERICAN
RESCUE
FUNDS
QUARTERLY
REPORT
April
1,
2022
through
June
30,
2022
through
through
Balance
BUDGET
6/30/22
6/30/22
Available
REVENUE
REPLACEMENT
SUBTOTAL
$
1,009,188.00
$
26,071.47.
S$
36,596.53