BOF Special Meeting Agenda 7-22-2025

agenda center agenda

Board/CommissionBoard of Finance
Meeting DateJuly 22, 2025
Pages8
File Size0.2 MB
OCR Status Searchable (OCR processed)
Source URLOriginal
Download PDF

Document Preview

Full Text (OCR Extracted)
FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
PHONE: 860-442-0553
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
www.waterfordet.ong
) = 33
&a
BOARD OF FINANCE w B
AGENDA °
BOE Conference Room Tuesday, July 22, 2025
Special Meeting Agenda 6:00pm
1. Establishment of a quorum and call to order
2. To consider and act on a request from the BOE Director of Finance/Operations, Joseph
Mancini, to appropriate $278,500 from designated line #20560-57893 (Great Neck
Field Improvement) and forward to the RTM if required,
3. To consider and act on a request from the BOE Director of Finance/Operations, Joseph
Mancini, for an additional appropriation in the amount of $71,500 to line #20560-
57893 (Great Neck Field Improvement) and forward to the RTM if required.
4, Adjournment

Mr. Joseph P. Mancini
Director of Finance
Mr. Thomas W. Glard til
‘Superintendent of Schools
July 21, 2025
This request is for an appropriation in the amount of $278,750 from Capital and Non-
recurring designated line 20560-57893 Great Neck Field Remediation.
This request is to move $278,750 from designated to appropriated and is accompanied
with another motion for $71,250 to bring funding of this project to $350,000. We are in the
process of evaluating bids, with specific efforts given to bringing bids down below the $350,000.
This project remediates the back recess area at Great Neck Elementary school to work towards
having the field available for students to access, historically this field has difficulty draining and
students were limited to time on the playscape and asphalt as a result.
Respectively,
Joseph Mancini
Director of Finance
15 Rope Ferry Road * P.O. Box 284 * Waterford, CT 06385
Phone: 860-444-5849 * Fax: 860-444-5870 * www.waterfordschools.org

6e'888'B6S$
‘QUI
‘Uos
pue
!y2049NS
oo000's8s$
Auadoug
Aemuaas9
aj
jesodsip
snid
oss‘o0es
oozze‘eess
11
‘sedeaspuer
Auaqn
68'LS0$
‘8y'678'LS0$
|
“Qu
‘Yoo
oan,
)
s60'69E$
00'0S9'rSr$
“Du
‘WnayIeUUOD
SeUNN
S1VLOL
YOGN3A
03L9313S
$Z0z
‘9%
aunr
‘Aepssnyy
:payessuad
Loday
wd
00:2
38
$202
‘97
Sunt
:3NIIGWad
ASNOdS3Y
UONonISUOIeY
easy
AC
d/Pjaly
a[UIVv
[OOYIS
AlejUSUIa|3
AION
Jess
€€0-v7
#841
“ON
B31
NOILVINGVL
NOLLWATWAS
‘$8€90 19
‘poopaieyn
‘Py
Avs
adoy
ST
quay
Bulseyaing
‘Aneg
eays
Psoparemm
Jo
uMOL

LIBERTY LANDSCAPES, LLC
ATHLETIC FIELD CONTRACTORS,
TOWN OF WATERFORD
165 GREAT NECK ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385,
ATIN: BILL MCMINN ~ PROJECT MANAGER
‘ATHLETIC FIELD/ PLAY AREA ~ 45,000 SF
1. MOBILIZATION
2, 6 PRIVACY SCREEN FENCING (1¥R)
3. REMOVAL & DISPOSALS
‘+ STRIP OFF EXISTING VEGETATION ~ 2”
‘© REMOVE EXISITNG ROOTZONE - 6”
© PUSH TOWARDS DOG LEG
4 E ESTABLISHE!
5S. FURNISH & INSTALL 2MM SAND LAYER - 1”
© LASER GRADE SAND
6. ROOTZONE BLEND~5”
IMPORT & FURNISH TOPSOIL ~1.5”
LASER GRADE TOPSOIL
IMPORT & FURNISH C33 SAND ~3.5”
LASER GRADE SAND
REVERSE TILL IN 3 DIRECTIONS.
LASER GRADE FINISHED GRADE
7. IRRIGATION SYSTEM
8 SETMANHOLE TO GRADE
‘© PROTECTIVE RESILIENT PADDING
9. FERTILITY AMENDMENTS,
‘* NUTRITINAL TESTING
10, SEEDING PER SPECIFICATIONS
111. MAINTENANCE PER SPECIFICATIONS,
2.5% BOND
Notes:
GREAT NECK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATHLETIC FIELD/PLAY AREA RECONSTRUCTION
PROPOSAL
JULY 21, 2025,
$5,000.00
$9,170.00
$29,900.00
$8,330.00
$19,190.00
$129,670.00
$62,000.00
$3,500.00
$1,000.00
$15,750.00
$20,000.00
$300,850.00
‘ROCK REMOVAL — If, DURING THE PERFORMACE OF THE CONTRACT, ROCK REMOVAL IS REQUIRED, THE PRICE SHALL BE
‘$500 PER CUBIC YARO FOR THE FIRST TEN YARDS. IF TEN CUBIC YAROS OF ROCK ARE EXCEEDED, THE PRICE SHALL BE $250
PER CUBIC YARD.
+ UNSUITABLE SOILS ~ If, DURING THE PERFORMACE OF THE CONTRACT, UNSUITABLE SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE PRICE
SHALL BE $500 PER CUBIC YARD FOR THE FIRST TEN YARDS. IF TEN YARDS OF UNSUITABLE SOILS ARE EXCEEDED, THE PRICE
‘SHALL BE $100 PER CUBIC YARD.
+ MATERIAL TESTING ~ ALL MATERIAL TESTING COSTS WILL BE BY OTHERS
P.0. BOX 7, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 * TELEPHONE (860) 289-8073

50'LISw
<S55'R> 0 sem id)
oo'oss'vsr$
Irion
(GLvnualty
dav)
W3LSAS
NOLLWOIWUI
JO
NOLWTIVISNI
00'000'sE$
00'000's€$
SIOHM
NV
STVIUSLVN.
2
40 @pIsino) NOLLWTIVISNI
NV
SIVIaLWV
00'059'6Lr$
o0v0s9'6Ly$
SIOHM
LL
Tv
-WNs
4wm
L
Tyo,
3509
1UN
aunseew
Jo
31UN,
Auend
uopdusseg
wey]
ur]
>a0@
yh2e
soun(y
saa
301d

Joseph Mancini
From: Luis Cibrao <luisc@nunesconst.com>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2025 1:54 PM
To: Kevin Dufour
Cc: William McMinn; Joseph Mancini; Scott Vose; Kari Nunes; Filipe Nunes
Subject: RE: Great Neck optional revisions,
Ort| PHISHING)
[To alert Ih ofia security concern, use the
Good afternoon Kevin,
I was able to discuss this with Phil Nunes, and he a
In total it comes out to a savings of about $ 85,555.
Also, we have other ideas to save money but would like to discuss them
cd on the following possible cost savings below in RED.
another meeting onsite.
Regards,
Luix Cibrac
Controller | EEO Officer
Nunes Connecticut, Inc.
“An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer”
Ph: 413-547-6488
From: Kevin Dufour <kevin@tomirwinadvisors.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2025 3:04 PM.
To: Luis Cibrao <luisc@nunesconst.com>; rachel @liberty498.com; Kari Nunes <karin@nunesconst.com>;
smiller@turcogolf.com
Cc: McMinn William <wmeminn@waterfordschools.org>; Joseph Mancini <jmancini@waterfordschools.org>; Scott Vose
<scottvose@tomirwinadvisors.com>
Subject: Great Neck optional revisions.
Thank you for attending the contractor interviews for the Great Neck Elementary School Project. As we had
discussed, cost is a significant factor in evaluating any bids. If any contractors wish to exercise an option to
adjust their proposal as part of a value engineering process, that would be welcomed by the Town.
Some areas where savings could be realized are listed below. These options, singularly or in combination, are
all acceptable to the town. The list below are suggestions only and is not intended as a comprehensive or
exclusive list of cost savings options. All options are welcome and will be evaluated individually.
Some potential cost savings options include:
* Reduce the soil profile to 5" (thus saving 2" of material costs and related disposal costs)
1. 454 CY @ $45.00 = ($ 20,430)
1

* Reduce the shim layer to 1" (thus saving half the cost for the shim layer and reducing the amount of
material to be transported off-site)(both options reduce the amount to be removed and transported
off-site 3" or 1/3)
2. 225 CY @ $65.00 = ($ 14,625) - should remove entire shim area.
+ Remove the perimeter drain entirely and adjust the grades to utilize the existing surface drains (saving
the cost of the perimeter drain)
3. 435 FT Pipe =($ 18,000)
($ 5,000)
+ Reducing the Maintenance obligation to 6 months of the active growing season after construction is
completed. (reduces maintenance cost)
4. No deduction as we were going to hand it over 30 days after completing.
* Blend the rootzone onsite using imported topsoil and appropriate sands. This must still meet
performance specifications.
5. Difficult to do onsite without taking over parking lot. If we can use parking lot and restore,
then ($ 15,000).
* Potentially keeping some material on site in the "dog leg" area, provided that the existing drainage
outlets and wetland areas are protected. 18” of material in this 15,000 sq ft. area would equal the 6" in
the revised depths that would need to be removed from the 45,000 sq ft field area. ($ 12,500)
We feel the irrigation system is a very important aspect of the long-term success of the project, and it should
be included.
We would appreciate having any response back by close of business on Monday.
Cordially yours,
Kevin Dufour
Sustainability Advisor
Tom Irwin Advisors
Cell: 781-999-5464
Email: Kevin@tomirwinadvisors.com
Follow us at: www.tomirwinadvisors.co
LEED Accredited Professional
Green Globes Professional
Cordially yours,
Kevin Dufour
Sustainability Advisor
Tom Irwin Advisors.
Cell: 781-999-5464

Email: Kevin@tomirwinadvisors.com
Follow us at: www.tomirwinadvisors.co
LEED Accredited Professional
Green Globes Professional