Conservation Commission - 150 (05/13/2021)

agenda center attachment

Board/CommissionConservation Commission
Meeting DateMay 13, 2021
Pages2
File Size11.5 MB
OCR Status Searchable (OCR processed)
Source URLOriginal
Download PDF

Document Preview

Full Text (OCR Extracted)
GENERAL NOTES: 
8 
bay
LEGEND 
j 
Ny \
1) Reference is made to the following plans: 
TEST H OLE D ATA
These standard symbols may 
A) ”As-Built Plan, Property Belonging To Wendi L. Pettit, 16 Dimmock Road, Waterford, Connecticut, Scale: 1"=40', March 5, 
18 DIMMOCK ROAD, WATERFORD CT
be found in the drawing. 
2001." Plan surveyed and mapped by William F. Kent, RLS. Plan filed in Florek Surveying, LLC Records as Map *'302.. 
DATE 
DECEMBE 
,
%* 
Light Pole 
B) 
"Compilation Plan - File No. E8112, Map Showing Easement Area To Be Granted To The Connecticut Light And Power 
~ 
MBER 10, 2020
CONG. 
¢ _ ous 
Company DBA Eversource Energy Across The Property Of Kelly Wegg Joseph, 20R Dimmock Road, Town Of Waterford - 
TIME — 10:00AM TO 11:30AM
BIT. 
Bituminous 
County Of New London - Connecticut, Sheet 1 of 1, Scale: 1" = 20', Dated: October 23, 2018." Plan surveyed and mapped 
TEMPERATURE — 45 DEGREES
9S 
Utility Pole 
by James Bernardo Land Surveying. Plan filed on the Waterford Land Records as map 6497.
oy ater vane 
C) "New Lot D (Harris Property) Dimmock Road, Waterford, Connecticut, Date: 10-08-04, Scale: As-Shown."” Plan surveyed and 
CONDITIONS — SUNNY AND CLEAR
x 
xX 
Chain Link Fence 
mapped by R.P. Dimmock Associates. Plan filed on the Waterford Land Records as map 4977. 
ENGINEER — DAVID L. COOLEY, P.E., DLC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC 
SITE 
yd
== 
Boundary Line 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT — DANIELLE HOLMES, REHS/RS, LEDGE LIGHT HEALTH DISTRICT 
§ 
30. wey | x)
Edge of Road / Drive 
2) Not all underground utilities have been shown. Call before you dig (CBYD) is recommended prior to any construction. 
3 
\\ ae 
7
sae = Stone Mall 
TEST HOLE 1 - THI 
me) 
A
CB Catch Basin 
; 
5 
3 
; 
; 
— 
; 
; 
“eT 
3
SMH Sewer Manhole 
3) North orientation is based on two independent RTK GNSS observations utilizing the Superior Network in February 2020. 
6.= 9" 
TOPSOIL/FILL MATERIAL 
GREAT 
A”
LP.S. 5/8” Iron Pin Set 
9” — 16” 
TOPSOIL 
/
RR SPIKE ae eee = Found 
4) The word certify as used is understood to be an expression of professional opinion by the surveyor. It is a declaratory statement which is 
16” — 26” 
LIGHT ORANGE BROWN MEDIUM SANDY LOAM
eR ‘Pall ole Sek. 
based on the surveyor's best knowledge, information and belief. As such it constitutes neither a guarantee nor warranty, expressed or implied, 
26” — 38” 
LIGHT YELLOW BROWN COARSE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL 
®. 
&
WLF 2 
Wetland Flag 
of any information contained hereon. 
38” — 60” 
STANDING GROUNDWATER 
My
GMS__ 
Granite Merestone 
Pro XS ,
ae 
ose
EX. CONC. ite ome es crete Monument 
5) Removal or destruction of survey monumentation, whether set or found, as shown on this survey plan may be subject to Connecticut Statute 
STANDING GROUNDWATER AT 38” - 
Grade ‘ 1700! 
.
Tree tine 
47-3Aa. 
TOTAL TEST HOLE DEPTH — 60” — NO LEDGE 
Proposed Clean 
out 
i 
Location Map
CHD CT Highway Department Monument 
REDOX/GW MOTTLING — 29” 
° 
SerQR SS grees ‘ 
4 
Proposed Silt Fence (TYP.) 
Graphic Scale 1" = 1000'
------- 
Existing 
Contour 
Li 
ji 
" 
‘ 
‘ 
;
xisting Contour Line 
6) Wetlands flagged by James Cowen, CPSS and field located by Florek Surveying, LLC thereafter. 
ROOTS DOWN TO 37 
—— -_ 
Existing Septic Tank (approx.) 
, 
\ 
gw 
e 
0 
1000 
200
a 
os 
TM, 
- 
‘i 
~ 
16, 
a
7) Engineering services completed by David Cooley, P.E., DLC Engineering Services, LLC. 
O 
ae 
*s~,_ Existing Septic Line 
‘, 
BS sy . "PVC Schedule 40 ASTM D1785 
ac ‘A ———
Bearing Chart: 
ae 
a 
Binet 1,250 Two-Compartment 
ii see eh cation @foundatin 
ff ee 
+4 / 
|
8) Subsurface sewage investigation areas sized based on projected Maximum Leaching System Spread calculations. Final leaching system 
aa 
Seema 
eptic Tank - Inlet invert 15.52°(TYP.) 
ae ee 
i 
a 
/
DINE.. SEARING _, 
DISTANCE 
spread will be determined based on percolation test results. 
ae 
Es ce Sted A ASTM sor wert Pan 
mY 
ft | fo Nf 
eee 
— a a, 
|
“5 . ee . 
soe 
ee a 
_below slab foundation with clean out 
Found @ 
F 
4 Stone Driveway 
f ete -_-— TT —---—- 7 H 
|
L3 
N 772743" E 
26.29" 
9) Property served by Public Water System - Waterford WPCA 
os iesrest (oe Proposed Garage 
oT 
oe 
ee eee i 
ae 
* 
!
L4 
N 79°0801" E 
18.72" 
Proposed Distribution 
e oe e ootprint (24'x24) 
aw 
\ eye fe 
ee 
i 
all _—_—-—_— 
7] 7 tty 
20" Maple 
| 
ja
ez4?aR” 
7 
xis) 
i 
salt 
i 
am 
’
= 
~ oe = 
22.0; 
10) Property is located in Flood X as shown on Firm Map, New London County, Connecticut (All Jurisdicitions) Panel 511 of 554, Community 
Bon) 
eee (To Be prairie a 
i 
—_— Th 834409" E/ 183. 79 
f) 
: 
eal
L7 
N 71°38'52” E£ 
9.62" 
Town of Waterford, Number 090107, Panel 0511, Suffix J; Map Revised: August 5, 2013. 
Test Hole 2 (TH2) 
- Eee ~ 
ae 
—_—_ aa 
— 
if] 
/
L8 
N 79°44°47" E 
7.07" 
poacinl 
——= $a ————_———“i—s—SM HL eee 
y
Lg 
N 74°49°57" E 
4.82’ 
Test 1 (PT1) 
eo 
\9 
; 
_-—-— 
| 
|
: 
Proposed Leaching Area #2 - 55 LF GST 6212 
A 
a eg eee 8 ge 
Gravel Driveway / 
_ | 
|
- Base Elevation 13.83 (TYP) 
Ue 
6 
1" Iron Pipe 
; 
fee ee 
ee fe 
errr Fee 
N's 
Q 
|
‘ 
— 
OC, 
Found 
y, 
i 
}/ 
|
Zoning Compliance Chart 
NOW OR F ORMERLY 
Percolation 
‘ 
\ 
; 
/ 
ale des 
: 
¢ 
' 
/
Zone: R-40 Accessory Dwelling 
Joseph Kelly Wegg 
Test 2 (PT2) 
\ 
" 
; 
\ 
satjaing tine 
e 
i 
v 
/
20 R Dimmock Road Silt Fence (TYP.) - Limits of Disturbance 
ine 
\ 
\ 
‘VF: 
— 
/ 
dS : 
8 
/
Required: 
Provided: 
P 
2-01 
76. 
asthe 2 (13) 
rit Hore 
extn Ts SORT 
NN Q 
age gORY 
/ 
Shs 
|} 
;
Minimum Lot Area: 
40,000 s.f. | 52,469 s.f. 
arcel ID 152 - 0173410 
Femail 
ae 
\ 
\} 
cee 
; 
We 
Pi 
me 
|
é 
\ 
EXISTING 
o 
i
Minimum Lot Frontage: 
100 ft. 
118.00 ft. 
Town Clerk. Volume 1560 Page 150 
an a 
Cae 
pass ree 
‘y 
\ 
\ 
&, 
/ 
H 
/
Minimum Lot Width: 
100 ft. 
100 es: fe eee One OS 
ce tf me: 
ee ee 
ee 
: 
aa 
le 
a 
‘ 
% 
ri 
/
Minimum Front Yard Setback: 
50 ft. 
152 ft. 
Sa 
i / 
ae 
/
Minimum Side Yard Setback 
25 ft. 
15.0 ft*. 
Ce] 
dge OfLawn 
XO 
‘ 
: 
oo ean 
Sire 
ke hg
Minimum Rear Yard Setback: 
50 ft. 
313 ft. 
‘“e a 
: 
fA 
\ 
rde\skp 
os 
“i]s 
9 
oh
Maximum Building Coverage: 
25% 
4.1% 
=r, 
Oe a ae alls 
oe 
= 
at Wetiens Busier t = 
XN 
wot 
2 
iS 
1S) 
vl \
. 
opps 
° 
“ 
= 
6. 
> 
= 
‘ 
7 
} Srain'! 
v 
wy 
By, >
Maximum Building Height: 
35 ft. 
20 ft. 
_- saat sees 
17 
B 
= s 
\ 
, 
i ie pan) 
Gl : 
~ 
di o
_ 
~. 
Ce, es 
° 
fo)
* Variance requested for Accessory Dwelling Structure 
_—- — 
Ig 
L. 
oof 
es 
_— 
/ / o 
/ 
x 
el
en 
ive eine 
ty 
Nay Weir gS ricgee eS : 
re | _ 
— : 
H 
wl
= 
Existing Lawn 
ti = 
“ss a "s ae oe eee bee 
i oe 
tiles 5 
AY 
i
— AQ! 
DrilHole 
RAN 
ASERETION Ts 
8" Henvock 
woe 
fF OSA 
ON ~~ 
\ 
Pe 
tea
Drill Hole 16.98 
Found 
\ 
oe 
; Mess. 75 
ee 
| 
Ny 
ae oat 
a 
/ 
Ny
Found 
’ 
\ 
were 
<)30" Maple 
= 
eee 
WLF 8 
eens 
/ 
/ 
g
: 
os 
“sg 
WLF 5
/ 
% 
gfiitenmnseang 
socal 
WLF 12 i 
WLF 10 
A 
| wie 4 _ Granite 
15" Maple
; 
Ne 
WLF 15 
phe te 
: 
“a 
ye 
WLF 9 
WL 
= :
. 
3 
~~ in 
Eg 
Sec. 57) me 
oS e 
é 
\WLF3 ae ‘I 
j
/ 
Subject Property: 18 Dimmock Road 
J 
cmaieees 
J 
2° OF tay, 
ie 
a 
7 
a 
pe- ‘i 
i arr)
. 
Osed Spo 
Bee 
ry 
O 
> 
' Bite 
.
NOW OR FORMERLY 
: 
Assgso0 eb! ! ze ie 2010 
Grade - 15.83" 
_ 
; 
ns 
{ 
Invgrt= 11.96 
WLF 2 
aa 
/ 
bs
Richard J. ¢» Wendi L. Pett, Trustee 
[% 
pol 
i 
fo 
; 
‘ 
i 
On: 
-- 
s 
/ 
/
Parcel ID 152 - 0176302 
ke 
; 
Asie 
_ — - 
; —_ esa oe _ 
/ 
ibe _— \ os 
/ 
;
Town Clerk Volume 1547 Page 261 a) 
oe ce. ae cael _ ae 
fee 
iit 
N 
/
eS 
—_— gt’ i Invert= 10.16 
——e 
i 
Per 
— 
way 
ar Y 
Proposed Spot 
_— 
.
iS 
57°08" W 510.0! 
| 
QT 
joe 
gravel Drive 
da 
Y 
Grade - 16.86" 
Existing Leaching Trenches
> 
S 8 
ate 
ocean, ene 
et 
ty 42 
Proposed Spot 
(crushed stone) (approx.)
a 
a ae 
mal 4 
Grade - 14.68'
ose og ee ES 
\ 
ee 
ene 
7 
Test Hole 1 (TH1)
/ 
_ eee ta 
eS eee 
J 7 
Proposed Leaching Area #1 - 25 LF GST
| rd 
ee re | 
Oe cael 
ee 
le 
[aie <n A lil 
/ 
6212 - Base Elevation 12.68' (TYP.)
_—_ oo 
7 
4% 
FR 
rn
/ 
ee ee 
¥ 
Bq, 
y 
PERCOLATION TEST 2 — PT2
con ae 
N
| rn GEA eae a eo ce 
Invert= 9.19 eg by 
DEPTH — 15”
: 
coon | a EO 
le - .00"
OS 
en 
NOW OR FORMERLY 
Invert= 10.03 
PRE-SOAK — 11:50PM
72 ~ 
eee 
ee 
ee 
Richard J. C» Wendi L. Petut, Trustee 
Pond
Bituminous Concrete 
a eer el — 
16 Dimmock Road 
HE 
WATER LEVEL (IN.) 
WATER LEVEL DROP (IN.) 
RATE MIN. /IN.
_ 
Driveway 
aL _— 
1:05PM 
4.00
~~ 
au 
Parcel ID 152 - 0176302
ST a 
PERCOLATION TEST DATA 
nao 
OE 
~~ 
44
Town Clerk Volume 1547 Page 261 
1:15PM 
6.25 
1.125 
44
milled amy 
dy 
loam, 
0 to 3 
1 
18 DIMMOCK ROAD, WATERFORD, CT 
1: 20PM 
7125 
0.875 
5.7
alpole sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 
Proposed 4” PVC ASTM D 3034 
1: 25PM 
8.00 
0.875 
5
The Walpole Series consists of very deep, poorly drained sandy soils formed in outwash and stratified drift. They are 
SDR 35 Effluent Distribution Piping 
DATE — DECEMBER 10, 2020 
4:30PM 
8.75 
0.75 
=p
nearly level to gently sloping soils in low-lying positions on terraces and plains. Slope ranges from 0 to 8 percent 
TIME — 12:00AM TO 2: 30PM 
: aay i 
0.75 
6.7
Non-wetland Soils: 
TEMPERATURE — 45 DEGREES 
1:45PM 
10.625 
050. 
10.0
The non-wetland soils consist primarily of: 
CONDITIONS — SUN NY AND CLEAR 
r seal 
- 
0.625 
8.0
51B Sutton fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes very stony 
> 
’ 
0.50 
10.0
73C Charlton-Chatfield complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes very rocky 
_ poly 
. . 
0.375 
13.3
_ 
: 
: 
0.375 
15.5
PERCOLATION TEST 1 
— PTI 
el 
bom 
pul 
ibs
DEPTH — 14.5” 
2:15PM 
13.25 
0.375 
13.3
2: 20PM 
EMPTY
SURVEY NOTES:
1. 
This survey has been prepared pursuant to the regulatio.
20-300b-20 and the "Standards for surveys and maps in
of Land Surveyors,
SURVEY based on a Re-Survey as shown as map reference
2. 
This survey conforms to Class A-2 /T-2
To the best of my knowledge and belief this map is
ns of the Connecticut State Agencies, Sections 20-300b-1 through
the State of Connecticut" as adopted by the Connecticut Association
Inc. on September 26, 1996; Amended October 26, 2018. This survey type is an ZONING COMPLIANCE
1A-1C. It is intended to show PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.
s-7-2])
Kets
Sul 6ciGV nt
substantially correct as noted thereon. 
==> 
a pec i =e " ipa as eal 
aii
WU ry, 
yl 
"Ny,
Lie . 
we CONN, 
woe CONNER, 
W
4 Ye £5. 5 | o| 2! 
Sx ol ORK 
tL 
CL. 
=f ke frase 
Sx rae BGM 
A TE RF OR D J CON N E C Tl CU T 
Town of Waterford, CT
jan = 
Se % ay ca AS 
yt 
— 
poe en 
PAS ‘ae i) < 
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Brian D. Florek,L.S. 
#70135 
Date 
ithout 
Sai ange KE 
eit Cooley, 
PB’ 
#2%892 
Date 
ithou 
Z 
xl =agge * E 
Graphic Scale 
REVISIONS: MARCH 13
Managing Member, Florek Surveying, LLC 
Embossed Seal 
zy No.70198 
4 5 
anaging Member, DLC Engineering Services, LLC 
Embossed Seal 
cook gam Jee 
1" = 20' 
,
239 Shore Road, Waterford, CT 06385 
“1 kgf SlCensern SS 
259 Noank Ledyard Road, Mystic, CT 06355 
a 
S 
Ne ‘CENSE & > 
20 
0) 
10 
20 
40° 
80 
MAY 28, 2020
bflorek@floreksurveyinglic.com 
“ah ris’ 
dicengineeringservicesllc@gmail.com 
" TON s 
PLAN REVISED THROUGH: MAY 5, 2021 
Sh eet | of 2
TEST HOLE 2 — TH2
0 - 10” 
TOPSOIL
10” — 37” 
YELLOW BROWN SANDY LOAM, SOME SILT
37° 
— 60 
GREY FINE SAND
STANDING GROUNDWATER AT 45”
TOTAL TEST HOLE DEPTH — 60” — NO LEDGE
REDOX/GW MOTTLING — 29”
ROOTS DOWN TO 45”
TEST HOLE 3 — THS
0 - 10” | 
TOPSOIL
10” — 30” 
ORANGE BROWN FINE SILTY LOAM
30° - 97 
GREY COARSE SAND
STANDING GROUNDWATER AT 37”
TOTAL TEST HOLE DEPTH — 57” — LEDGE/LARGE ROCK
REDOX/GW MOTILING — 26”
ROOTS DOWN TO 37”
PRE-SOAK — 11:55AM
TIME 
WATER LEVEL (IN.) 
WATER LEVEL DROP (IN.) 
RATE MIN./IN.
1:07PM 
5.125
10M 
2128 
400 
13 
SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY
1:22PM 
EMPTY 
) 
) 
LAND BELONGING TO:
ROBERT, JR. & GRACE KYNE
18 DIMMOCK ROAD
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 2021
Planning & Development

SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM NOTES 
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN CALCULATIONS 
LEACHING AREA #1 CROSS SECTION DETAIL 
SEPTIC ELEVATIONS SCHEDULE
CROSS SECTI ON’ A-K’ 
8 OUTLET DISTRIBUTION BOX
1. 
THERE ARE NO WELLS WITHIN 75 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 
BASIS OF DESIGN: 
- 
‘cca 
, 
DETAIL
2. 
THERE ARE NO FOOTING DRAINS WITHIN 25 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 
‘ 
8 
PROPOSED GRADE 
% 
SEPTIC TANK 
NOT TO SCALE
3. 
A CONDITION OF THIS DESIGN IS THAT THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SHALL BE STAKED 
RESIDENTIAL HOME — 4 BEDROOMS 
15° 
_ 
= 
15 
;
Se Ue a ee 
NO GARBAGE GRINDER AND NO LARGE TUBS OF 100-200 GALLONS 
12° MIN mal 
a 
REET EE 
Ibis
4. 
THE LICENSED INSTALLER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING THE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE. DISPOSAL 
Te 
= 
: 
14 
;
SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. IN ADDITION, PER PUBLIC HEALTH CODE 
ASSUME 150 GALLONS PER BEDROOM PER DAY, 75 GALLONS PER BEDROOM BEYOND THREE, AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 
a 
NATIVE FILL 
\ 
OUTLET INVERT 
15.27
REQUIREMENTS THE LICENSED INSTALLER SHALL BE ON-SITE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SYSTEM. 
DESIGN FLOW = 3 BEDROOMS X 150 GPD + 1 BEDROOM X 75 GPD = 525 GALLONS PER DAY 
13° 
i 
T 
+ ee 
ay 13’ 
’
" 
. 
DESIGN PERCOLATION RATE = 10.1 TO 20.0 MINUTES PER INCH 
12° 
— 
12° 
: 
.
6. 
THE LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT/DISTRICT MUST BE NOTIFIED BEFORE ANY PORTION OF THE 
eee 
BOTTOM OF TANK 
10.94 
11/2
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL 
SYSTEM IS CONSTRUCTED AND PRIOR TO BACKFILL OF ANY PORTIONS. 
DESIGN UTILIZES A 25 FT SEPARATION DISTANCE TO A OPEN WATERCOURSE/WETLAND PER TABLE 1 OF THE CTDPH TECHNICAL 
11 
11” 
GRADE ON TOP OF TANK 
; 
x
7. 
THE UNSTALLER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND. ADEQUATELY COMPACT ANY FILL THAT |S REQUIRED 
STANDARDS — ITEM C. THE 18 DIMMOCK ROAD LOT WAS IN EXSISTENCE PROR TO 8/16/1982 AND IS NOT LOCAT::D ON A 
‘a 
an 
16.86 
a ee a
BE PLACED IN 6 TO 8 INCH LIFTS AND SHALL BE MECHANICALLY COMPACTED. 
PUBLIC) MATER: SUPREY BSTERSHED, 
. 
DISTRIBUTION BOX 
Ld
8 
THERE SHALL BE NO CUTS WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE 
. 
r 
tl
DISPOSAL SYSTEM OR WITHIN 25 FEET OF THE SIDES OF THE SYSTEM. THERE SHALL BE NO STUMPS OR 
DESIGN COMPONENTS: 
INLET INVERT 
15.03’ 
eee 
prs 
hi
BOULDERS BURIED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE SYSTEM. 
8 
= 
8 
14.93" 
1-4 
| openmc 
a
9. 
SHOULD ANY SIGNIFICANT VARIATIONS FROM TEST PIT DATA SHOWN (LEDGE, GROUNDWATER, 
1,250 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANK 
> 
“aa, 
LEACHING UNIT OUTLET INVERT 
4. 
ya" 
OF 
bt
i 
= 
a 
ti 
sa ie 
— 
dl
10. IN GENERAL, ALL CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, AS PER THE PUBLIC HEALTH CODE, SHALL BE ADHERED TO. 
ERREGTIVE LEACHING AREA, RESUIRED = 267.5 Sr \FER "TABLE 6 (OF “THE: CIDFH sTEGISGA.. STANDARDS 
INLET INVERT 
13.68’ 
of 
‘ 
iossaich 
a. 
"
THE FOLLOWING OUTLINES SOME OF THE MAJOR PROCEDURES, BUT DO NOT RELIEVE THE INSTALLER 
62"x12” GEOMATRIX GST 6212 LEACHING SYSTEM, ELA=10.0 SF/LF 
NOT TO SCALE 
.. 
; 
11/2"
FROM FULL COMPLIANCE DUE TO THEIR LACK OF MENTION BELOW: 
12 FOOT MINIMUM ROW SPACING (ON CENTER) 
a 
TOP ELEVATION 
13.68" 
{2 
TOP VIEW 
.
LENGTH OF LEACHING SYSTEM PROVIDED = 80 LF 
= 
LEACHING AREA #2 
~
RAIN STORM OR IF THERE IS STANDING WATER IN THE AREA. 
- 
11/2" 
+ 
an? 
bey 1/2" 
D-BOX DESIGN SPECIFICATION
b. 
THE EARTH SHALL BE SCARIFIED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT. GRAVEL FILL SHALL MEET PUBLIC 
Vo ee i 
nS 
LEACHING AREA #2 CROSS SECTION DETAIL 
INLET INVERT 
14.83’ 
/ 
id 
f 
CONFORMS TO LATEST:
HEALTH CODE SPECIFICATIONS AND BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NOTE. 7. 
, 
: 
ASTM DESIGNATION C913
c. 
NO TRUCKS OR HEAVY MACHINERY SHALL BE ALLOWED IN THE STRIPPED AREA. 
DEPTH TO RESTRICTIVE LAYER = 29 INCHES - GROUNDWATER MOTTLING/REDOX 
CROSS SECTION B-B 
TOP ELEVATION 
14.83’ 
NOTES:
11. 
THIS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED TO ACCEPT BACKWASH FROM A 
MLSS = HF X FFX PF = 34 X 1.75 X 1.25 = 74.4 LF 
17 
ie 
17" 
; 
1. 
PIPE INLET AND OUTLET LOCATIONS
WATER SOFTENER. 
80 LF OF LEACHING SYSTEM PROVIDED — SLIGHTLY CONVERGING 
; 
PROPOSED GRADE 
fd 
5’ 
BASE ELEVATION 
13.83 
13 1/4" | wer 
HAVE POLYLOK PIPE SEALS.
12, ALL GEOMATRIX GST 6212 INSTALLATIONS UTILIZE A SPECIFIED SAND (SEE DESIGN NOTE ON SPECIFIED 
75 LF OF LEACHING SYSTEM SPREAD PROVIDED 25 FT DOWNGRADIENT — MLSS ACHIEVED 
16 
- 
: 
16 
OPENING 
2. 
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE
INGH MINIMUM ON THE SDES THE DEPIM OF SPEGIFED SAND UNDERNCATIN 
THE LEACHING SYSTEM. 
s-== 
SS 
psig sal ay 
TV 
5. METHON OF MANUFACTURE: 
WE
iN ees 
1 
. 
METHOD 
OF MANUFACTURE: 
Wi
SHALL BE INCREASED BASED ON EXISTING GRADES WITH TOPSOIL REMOVED TO MAINTAIN A LEVEL 
LEACHING AREA #1 BASE ELEVATION (UPGRADIENT SIDE) - 12.68 FT 
; 
11.047) 
NATE: PRS 
; 
} 
woe 
CAST.
BASE ELEVATION FOR EACH LEACHING AREA. 
LEACHING AREA #2 BASE ELEVATION (UPGRADIENT SIDE) — 13.83 FT 
14 
t 
—— 
SNSTING GRADE | 4 
12" 
SIDE VIEW 
1 
4, 
SECTION IS MONOLITHIC,
13. THE SPACE BETWEEN THE GEOMATRIX GST 6212 SECTIONS CREATED AT ANGLED BENDS SHALL BE 
. 
1 1/2
14, lie nt it Pepe oe eg cD ey pat on tee eae ae 
OF THE CTDPH TECHNICAL STANDARDS MEETING THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND GRADATION: 
2 
————— 
12° 
1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK DETAILS 
SET be 
etc i
: 
INSTALL WATERTIGHT PLUGS ON ALL UNUSED
PERFORATED DISTRIBUTION PIPE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A 
SOLID CAP. 
SELECT FILL 
PERCENT PASSING 
; 
. 
; 
ssa 
‘ 
. 
- 
ieee
15. BACKFILL AND FINISH GRADING: CAREFULLY PLACE BACKFILL OVER THE LEACHING SYSTEM, A TOTAL 
SIEVE SIZE“ 
WET SIEVE 
_DRY SIEVE 
" 
: 
"1 
4250 GALLON 
OUTLETS.
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES OF WELL GRADED SANDY FILL (CLEAN, POROUS, AND DEVOID OF ROCKS) 
# 
100 
100 
- 
0 
AW 
|
AS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE FILTER FABRIC OVER 
THE DISTRIBUTION PIPE. FINISHED GRADE 
#10 
70-100 
70-100 
REGULAR
MUST DIVERT SURFACE RUNOFF FROM THE SOIL TREATMENT AREA AND PREVENT SURFACE PONDING 
#40 
10-508 
10-75 
; 
. 
ten 
me’ 
;
PER THE PROPOSED CONTOUR LINES AND SPOT GRADES PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN. PROTECT THE 
0-20 
9 
9 
SEPTIC TANK
SYSTEM AREA FROM EROSION BY LOAMING AND SEEDING OR BY USING OTHER APPROVED METHODS 
#100 
= 
0-5 
. 
_
OF EROSION CONTROL. 
#200 
0-5 
0-2.5 
8 
3’ 
Sale DERSH SPEROEKRON
EE ee ee ee en ie ee 
*PERCENT PASSING THE #40 SIEVE CAN BE INCREASED TO NO GREATER THAN 75% IF THE PERCENT PASSING THE #100 
AST DESIGNATION €1227
GEOMATRIX GST 62 SERIES DESIGN AND INSTALLATION MANUAL. 
SIEVE DOES NOT EXCEED'10% AND THE 
#200 SIEVE DOES NOT EXCEED 5% IF THE FILL FAILS THE DRY SIEVE BUT 
NOTES:
17, THE FILL OVER THE SEPTIC TANK SHALL NOT EXCEED 12 INCHES WITHOUT THE INSTALLATION OF 
FE WET SIEVE, THEN THE FILL 
SHALL BE APPROVED. 
OT TO 
SC 
4, 
JOINT SEACANT 1S BUTYL RUBSER
PASSES TH 
i 
SCA
PRECAST CONCRETE RISERS ABOVE THE MANHOLES. IF RISERS ARE INSTALLED, THE ORIGINAL COVERS 
WaASHC TOE SEAL THAT CORFORMS 
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL
ON THE SEPTIC TANK SHALL REMAIN. 
C33 SAND _- PERCENT 
cin math
18, A CLEAN OUT SHALL BE INSTALLED JUST INSIDE THE FOUNDATION WALL ON THE BUILDING SEWER PIPE 
SIEVE SIZE 
PASSING 
| 
SPECICATION $$-$~0021(210-A),
FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES. 
0.375" 
100 
cE 2. 
PPE INLET AND OUTLET LOCATIONS
# 
ee 
NOTES: 
8 pe Ss 
nowronene stem. peroruen 
SOMN 
, EXISTING
#8 
80.0—100.0 
1. 
TOPSOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED WITHIN THE LEACHING AREA AND EXTEND A 
t 
i 
} CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM 
= 
PAVEMENT
#16 
50.0-85.0 
MINIMUM OF 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS BEYOND THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE 
i 
a MERPORCIGT 
EEE, WRLDED GRE 
- 
ke 
Fy
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 
#0 
ayy 
LEACHING SYSTEM. 
= 
t 
FABRE: CONFORM TO LATEST AST 
I —— 
- 
ZZMOUNTABLE BERM
el 
a0 
2. 
COMMON/NATIVE CLEAN FILL SHALL BE USED TO FILL THE REMAINING AREAS 
7 
gg i 
eae ee FA 
PROFILE 
(OPTIONAL)
1. SURVEYOR TO MARK LIMITS OF CLEARING AND THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE. 
9200 
5 
- - 
SUMO INATVE CLEAN FLL SHALL a ee = eee a AL 
SIREN $000 Pee AT 28 Oar, 
as
2. INSTALL SILT FENCE AS INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN AND PER EROSION AND SEDIMENT 
NOTE: ASTM C33 SELECT SAND SHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY MATERIAL LARGER THAN THE THREE (3) INCH 
. 
iH 
& METHOD 
OF NAN 
50°MIN. 
_
CONTROL PLAN 
SIEVE. UP TO 45% OF THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE MAY BE RETAINED ON 
THE #4 
DIREGTIONS, BEYOND THE OUTER PERIMETER DP JHE LEACHING SYSTEM. 
L 
7, SECTIONS ARE MOHOLTOC. 
z
" 
SIEVE. THE MATERIAL THAT PASSES THE #4 SIEVE IS THEN REWEIGHED AND THE SIEVE ANALYSIS 
tl 
~onnieneaniin 
EXISTING 
2
3, INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AS INDICATEDION THE SITE PLAN AND PER EROSION AND 
STARTED. 
TOP VEW 
Poles 
| 
S
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. 
NO, 6 STONE AGGREGATE 
lilac 
bi 
4 
wai: EXISTING
4, 
DEMOLISH EXISTING GARAGE. 
= 
PERCENT ACCC (EY een) 
en 
N 
7] PAVEMENT
5. 
SURVEYOR TO MARK LIMITS OF FOUNDATION FOR PROPOSED GARAGE AND ADDITION. 
2" 
N/A 
GEOMATRIX GST TMLEACHING SYSTEM 
ae i 
aniiniasesll 
Tes oa 
SAP
6. EXCAVATE FOR AND CONSTRUCT FOUNDATION FOR PROPOSED GARAGE AND ADDITION. 
1.5 
N/A 
; 
Plan 
| 
; al 
= 
ae 
FS
7. EXCAVATE FOR AND INSTALL UTILITY SERVICE TO THE PROPOSED GARAGE. 
3 
0-40 
ene 
: 
eer 
=
” 
= 
4 
: 
x 
goa" 
i
8. 
CONSTRUCT PROPOSED GARAGE AND ADDITION, 
1/2" 
20-55 
: 
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
9. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING WITHIN THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE. 
hy 
0-15 
cr F 
:
: 
oo 
1. 
STONE SIZE 
— 
USE 
1—4 
INCH 
STONE, 
OR 
RECLAIMED 
OR 
RECYCLED CONCRETE
eid eaucppicnicliniahamms 
cas 
NOTE: STONE AGGREGATE MUST BE OF UNFORM CONSISTENCY AND ONLY CONTAIN CLEAN, HARD, TOUGH, DURAB!E 
4 Yea 
‘ 
| 
EQUIVALENT.
11. INSTALL DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREAS. 
FRAGMENTS THAT MEET THE SPECIFICATIONS CITED | 
4 
: 
_
FOR 
RESEEDING 
TECHNICAL STANDARDS, WHICH INCLUDES A FINES STANDARD OF A MAXIMUM OF 1% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE AT THE 
25” 
jb 
eee 
eet 
2. LENGTH WINOT LESS THAN 50, FEET, EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE A
12. TOPSOIL OF EXPOSED SOILS TO PREPARE 
FOR 
RESEEDING. 
PIT/QUARRY SOURCE. THIS STANDARD SHOULD ALSO BE MET AT THE SSDS INSTALLATION SITE; HOWEVER IN NO CASE 
*" spe VIEW 
:
13, RESEED ALL EXPOSED AREAS PER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. COVER WITH 
SHALL THE FINES EXCEED 1.5% 
CT DOT #6 
3. THICKNESS — NOT LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES.
stone 
4. WIDTH — TWELVE 
(12) 
FOOT MINIMUM, 
BUT NOT LESS THAN 
THE FULL WIDTH AT
ones 
IN PLACE UNTIL ALL UP-GRADIENT AREAS ARE PERMANENTLY 
) 
ENTRANCE TO fgiets PB HERES SOI TRENT FOUR AA) HOG te INGLE
Tas SIRT FERES TOREMARS 
; 
: 
a 
Fae UNITED CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC,
ESTABLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE TOWN OF WATERFORD. 
4” 
SDR 35h 
ees conden Ste 
qh BO HES 
PA. (2019) 25S—a08 
5. GEOTEXTILE — WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE.
12’Distribution 
Se 
YRESMLLE, CT 06492 
(203) 269-3119 
6. SURFACE WATER — ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CON-
Pipe 
Sl 
ASTM C—33 
a 
. 
STRUCTION ACCESS SHALL BE PIPED BENEATH THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS
Say 
= 
fe 
May vuseare 
IMPRACTICAL, 
A 
MOUNTABLE BERM 
WITH 
5:1 
SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED.
ey 
a ait 
7. MAINTENANCE — THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL
3 
1. SEE ELEVATION SCHEDULE FOR SEPTIC TANK INSTALLATION ELEVATIONS. 
MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 
—
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN: 
= A’ 
2. SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 
a SRN STING, IS REQUIRED. pa FE one AapheA gee WITH STONE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND INSTALLED PER THE 2002 
9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH
CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.
4. 
ESTIMATED DURATION OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES — 90 DAYS
2. 
SURVEYOR TO MARK WETLAND SETBACK LIMITS ON THE PROPERTY AS APPLICABLE.
3. 
SILT FENCE IS TO BE INSTALLED, AS INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND INSPECTED BY TOWN STAFF. A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE
SHALL BE GIVEN FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 
SILT FENCE. DETAIL
4. 
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE INSTALLED, AS INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY 
wis
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 
;
5. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED 
AS INDICATED IN THE 
GEOMATRIX GST 
“LEACHING SYSTEM 
ee 
—
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ON THE SITE PLAN. 
B-B’ CROSS SECTION 
FLTER FABRIC MATERIAL 
ee Sam Sor
6. STOCKPILE AREAS MUST BE DIRECTLY CONTAINED WITHIN SILT FENCE AROUND THE COMPLETE 
Finished Grade shall be pitched to sheet
PERIMETER. 
flow stormwater away from system 
:
7. 
EXCESS SPOILS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE AT AN APPROPRIATELY LICENSED FACILITY. 
VRVARV AVA
8. ALL REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 
Cover material depth shall be >6” 
‘ 
—s)
GS Pl ag tp dpc wager tps thtoice 
Roark)
IF DURING THE PLANTING SEASON, RECOMMENDED SEEDING DATES SHALL BE BETWEEN APRIL 
and shall be uniform over system 
I RERLEL 
xo 
vos 
RA 
SAS: 
a
15 AND SEPTEMBER 15. SEED MIX WILL CONSIST OF 0.45 LB PER 1,000 S.F. OF CREEPING RED OR 
STW (253 Sand 
, 
WSS
TALL FESCUE, 0.05 LB PER'1,000 S.F. OF REDTOP AND 0.20 LB PER 1,000 S.F. OF BIRD’S FOOT 
te-mmeval wsiiend 
ter Fobri 
istribution Pipe 
i 
SIDE_VIEW
TREFOIL WITH INNOCULENT. FERTILIZER MAY BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 7.5 LB PER 1,000 S.F. 
CT DOT No. 
6
OF 10-10-10. 
ee 
aaa
9, SILT FENCE BARRIER TO BE MAINTAINED AND LEFT IN PLACE UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE 
—
ESTABLISHED VEGETATION TO THE SATISFACTION OF TOWN STAFF. 
now RE
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAILY INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SILT
FENCE AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CONDITIONS ONSITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 
mi
11. PROJECT ENGINEER MAY BE CALLED FOR SPECIAL INSPECTIONS TO ASSESS EROSION AND 
>2” 
f
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN EFFECTIVENESS AND MAKE REVISIONS AS NECESSARY. 
| 
—_
12. PROJECT ENGINEER MAY ALSO BE CALLED IN TO ASSESS EMERGENCY SITUATIONS (I.E. SEVERE 
LENGTH OF 
S | TE | M P R O VE M E N T S U, R VE Y
FLOODING, RAINS OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS). 
GEOMATRIX GST “LEACHING SYSTEM 
sore
A-A’ CROSS SECTION 
INTERLOCKED 
eepeey ine 
LAND BELONGING TO:
W/ATTACHED FABRIC 
R O B E R
ANGLE ENDS OF FILTER FABRIC FENCE
PLAN VIEW 
T, JR. & GRACE KYNE
Finished Grade shall be pitched to sheet 
eS ees ete 
a
flow stormwater away from Say 
yy 
18 DIMMOCK ROAD
NV 
/
ond shall be uniform a syetem 
gy ren 
WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
505 Bae 
SCALE: 1"= 20'
me 
REVISIONS: MARCH 13, 2020
SCT DOT No. 6 
MAY 28, 2020
stone 
PLAN REVISED THROUGH: MAY 5, 2021
(or approved equivilant)
Sheet 2 of 2