Conservation Commission - 914 (07/11/2024)
agenda center attachment
| Board/Commission | Conservation Commission |
|---|---|
| Meeting Date | July 11, 2024 |
| Pages | 11 |
| File Size | 2.7 MB |
| OCR Status | Searchable (OCR processed) |
| Source URL | Original |
Document Preview
Full Text (OCR Extracted)
May 22 7024 TOWN OF WATERFORD Application for Inland Wetland / Watercourse Permi Planning & Development Type of Application: Agency Use: Town of Waterford, CT Permitted Use, Section 4.1 Date Received: 5 aa [aoa 4 Unregulated Activities, Section 4.2 Received By: Regulated Activities, Section 6 Vv Fee: [Go 00 Application Number: C-24-05 1. Applicant: 1721, LLC Phone: 203-348-8378 Address; 205 Willowbrook Avenue Stamford State, CT Zip: 06385 Fax: E-Mail: august.lenhart@gmail.com 2. Owner: <Same as applicant> Phone: Address: State: Zip: Fax: E-Mail: 3. Agent: Indigo Land Design, LLC (Joe Wren, PE) Phone: 860-388-9343 Address: 40 Elm St., 2nd Fl. Old Saybrook State:_CT Zip: 06475 Fax: E-Mail: _jwren@indigo-land.com 4. Property Address: 430 Mohegan Avenue Parkway & 23B Old Norwich Road Tax Map 76 Lots 10164 & 5600 5. Abutting Property Owners — Complete Attached Form <S€€ attached> 6. Activity to be Reviewed and / or Licensed (attach sheet if necessary): <see attached> 7. Description of Proposed Activity (attach sheet if necessary): <S¢ attached> 8. Purpose of Activity (attach sheet if necessary): <see attached> 9a. Acreage of Property: 5.716 ac 9b. Acreage of Wetlands: 0.042 ac. (on-site) 10. Acreage of Wetlands Altered: 0.0 - None 11. Wetland Mitigation Proposed: 0.0 - None 12. Section 7 and sections 8.1 & 8.2 of the Town of Waterford “Inland Wetlands and Watercourse Regulations” have been complied with: (Review attached check list) Yes: No: The applicant / owner hereby gives the Commission, its agent and consultants the right of free access to any part of the property under consideration. The undersigned warrants the truth of all statements contained herein and in all supporting documents according to the best of his / her knowledge, information and belief. Applicant: Date: 9-21-24 Owner: _<Same as applicant> Date: 5-21-24 Agent: Cesyet When Date: 5-21-24 TOWN OF WATERFORD Application for Inland Wetland / Watercourse Permit 1721, LLC 430 Mohegan Avenue Parkway & 23B Old Norwich Road 6. Activity to be Reviewed and / or Licensed (attach sheet if necessary): The activity to be reviewed includes some clearing and grading in the 100' upland review area for the construction of two stormwater management basins. A portion of the 100' URA on site will be retained, the majority of the URA width on site is proposed to be 75 feet, and a small portion in the northeast corner will be 50 feet but, in no case, is the URA width proposed to be less than 50 feet. 7. Description of Proposed Activity (attach sheet if necessary): The applicant is proposing a 24-unit (16 single-family homes and 4 duplex-style homes) 8-30g affordable housing development on the subject property. All proposed buildings, roadways, utilities, stormwater basins are proposed beyond the 100' URA. Some clearing and grading is necessary within the outer fringes of the URA for the construction of the stormwater management basins. The proposed activity within 100 feet from the wetlands for this project is limited to clearing and grading and will be revegetated ~ this area of disturbance is approximately 0.15 acres. There is no proposed work within any wetland area or within 50 feet of any wetland area. 8. Purpose of Activity (attach sheet if necessary): As mentioned above, the purpose of the activity is for clearing and grading in the URA for the construction of the two proposed stormwater management basins. The entire disturbed area within the URA will be revegetated and no other improvements are proposed within the URA. dvO¥w HOIMYON G10 ZZ A GYVHOIY NILYVIN 8 d NSHd3 LS YOTAVL SZE90 1D “THIH YDIVND AVMAYWd ANNIAV NVOIHOW! Zev AN Yd SAV NVDSHOW Zev SNNIYOD VIISVS SZE90 19 ‘TIIH YSAVND LYNOD SLYIGOY Z LYNOD SLYAGOU Z 1 Y3sINNAf 3TH SZLE90 19 ‘TIIH YANVND LD SLYIGOH 8 LYNOD SLY3IdOU 8 0Z€90 LD ‘NOGNOT MIN SAV NVDSHOW OLZ dvO¥ HOIMYON G10 €T 43937109 LNDILSANNOS SZE90 LD “THIH YSAVND GVO HDIMYON G10 €Z dVvO¥ HDIMYON C10 €Z TAA 8 d JNAVM GIONYY S8€90 LD ‘GYOIYSLVM Yd SINVT NIML 67 LYNOD SLY3gOU O11 T2ZT S8E90 1D ‘GYOSYILVM YC SAV NIML 67 GVO" HIIMYON G10 Vez O71 T2ZT S8€90 LD ‘GYOIYILVM Yd SANVT NIML 67 QVO¥ HDIMYON G10 gEz O11 TZZT S8E90 LD ‘GYOIYALVM UC SAV NIML 67 ANd SAV NVDSHOW O€V O11 T2ZT ssouppy Sule ssouppy Aqedoig #1 [224ed JaUMO 70} Juadelpy saiqiedoig WUWad quawysey uolnesiddy UOISSIWIWOD UOI}EAJaSUOD CLAEngineers, Inc. Civil © Structural © Survey 317 MAIN STREET e NORWICH, CT 06360 © (860) 886-1966 © (860) 886-9165 FAX April 23, 2024 Joe Wren, PE Principal Indigo Land Design, LLC 40 Elm Street, 2nd Floor Re: 430 Mohegan Avenue Parkway 23B Old Norwich Rd Waterford CT CLA —7572 Dear Mr. Wren: At your request, CLA Engineers delineated inland wetlands on the referenced parcel according to the State of Connecticut statutory definition as described in C.G.S. Section 22a. CLA conducted fieldwork in February, March and April of 2024 and delineated the inland wetland boundary with sequentially numbered pink flagging tape. This letter documents the wetland delineation and the soils encountered on the site. Site Setting The site is currently undeveloped except for a sanitary sewer that runs along the northerly side from Roberts Court to Mohegan Avenue Parkway. The vegetation is in an early stage of old field succession and dominant vegetation includes multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) barberry (Berberis thumbergii) reaspberry (Rubus spp.) Where trees occur, they include red maple (Acer rubrum) tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissma) hickories (Carya spp.) and black walnut (Juglans nigra). The current land use surrounding the site is predominantly residential to the west, north and east. Connecticut College is located to the south. The topography of the site features moderate to gentle hillslopes with high elevations of approximately 168° NAVD on the southwestern side of the site down to elevation approximately] 18’ in a bowl like depression on the eastern edge of the site. Surface water flows offsite to east under Mohegan Avenue Parkway via a culvert. The water eventually flows into Mamacoke Cove. Fill, in the form of boulders, was historically placed along upland edge of wetland and subsurface flow emanates from boulder fill area. Soils Southern New England was overlain by glacial ice as recently as 12,000-15,000 years ago during the Wisconsin glaciation. The materials that the glaciers deposited over top the local bedrock determine the surficial geology of the region and of the site. These glacial deposits are generally divided into three categories: glacial till (un-stratified sand, silt and rock), glaciofluvial (water sorted, stratified sand and gravel), and glaciolacustrine (stratified sand, silt and clay that settled out in lakebeds). The original type of glacial deposit present on the site is glacial till. This finding is based on on-site—observations and the NRCS mapping (attached) that shows the soil series mapped as (51) Sutton, (61) Canton and Charlton and (84) Paxton and Montauk. The soils on the site have been re-graded for the existing site development within the sewer easement. The slopes down to the wetlands reflect past grading and filling. Table 1 is a sumary table of the soils found on the site. Appendix A provides additional soil data Table 1 - Soil Types and Properties at the 430 Mohegan Avenue Parkway Site Soil Series Parent Material Drainage Class Texture/Characteristics 3 Ridgebury, Glacial till with Somewhat Poorly | Sandy loam Leicester, dense layer to very poorly Whitman* drained 51 Sutton Glacial till Moderately well | Sandy loam drained 61 Canton and Glacial till Well Drained Sandy loam Charlton 84 Paxton and Glacial till Well Drained Sandy Loam Montauk * Wetland soil types on site, not mapped by NRCS The Ridgebury, Leicester and Whitman series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly to poorly drained soils formed in lodgment till derived mainly from granite, gneiss and/or schist. They are commonly shallow to a densic contact. They are nearly level to gently sloping soils in depressions in uplands. The Sutton series consists of very deep, moderately well drained loamy soils formed in melt-out till. They are nearly level to strongly sloping soils on hills, low ridges, and ground moraines, typically on footslopes, lower backslopes and in slight depressions. The Canton and Charlton series consists of very deep, well drained soils formed in a loamy mantle underlain by sandy till. They are on nearly level to very steep moraines, hills, and ridges. The Paxton and Montauk series consists of well drained loamy soils formed in lodgment till. The soils are very deep to bedrock and moderately deep to a densic contact. They are nearly level to steep soils on hills, drumlins, till plains, and ground moraines. (Source: NRCS https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov) Wetland Description This site has one wooded wetland system that system that continues to the east. Citation: (https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/.) EL Classification code: PFOLE System Palustrine (P) : The Palustrine System includes all nontidal wetlands dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergents, emergent mosses or lichens, and all such wetlands that occur in tidal areas where salinity due to ocean-derived salts is below 0.5 ppt. It also includes wetlands lacking such vegetation, but with all of the following four characteristics: (1) area less than 8 ha (20 acres); (2) active wave-formed or bedrock shoreline features lacking; (3) water depth in the deepest part of basin less than 2.5 m (8.2 ft) at low water; and (4) salinity due to ocean-derived salts less than 0.5 ppt. Class Forested (FO) : Characterized by woody vegetation that is 6 m tall or taller. Subclass Broad-Leaved Deciduous (1) : Woody angiosperms (trees or shrubs) with relatively wide, flat leaves that are shed during the cold or dry season; e.g., black ash (Fraxinus nigra). Water Regime Seasonally Flooded/Saturated (E) : Surface water is present for extended periods (generally for more than a month) during the growing season, but is absent by the end of the season in most years. When surface water is absent, the substrate typically remains saturated at or near the surface. The on-site wetland has predominantly of red maple trees in the canopy. The understory is a dense tangle of multiflora rose and Japanese barberry. Also present were jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) and skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus). Vernal Pool Investigation CLA conducted on-site investigations of the wetland on March 15, 2024 and April 8 2024. These dates coincided with site visits to other, known vernal pools in coastal southeastern Connecticut, which had wood frog and spotted salamander egg masses present. No wood frog or spotted salamander egg masses were found at the site, nor was there any other evidence of reproduction of vernal pool species. The maximum depth of water present in the wetland was six inches. Given this hydrology, it is not surprising that the wetland does not support vernal pool species. Potential for Wetland Impacts CLA understands that the proposed development, as designed by Indigo land Design LLC, has the following characteristics: e A 75-foot vegetated buffer will be maintained around the inland wetland. e The stormwater treatment system is designed to meet the CTDEEP 2004 Manual as revised to 2024. e The Erosion and Sedimentation controls have been designed to be consistent with the CTDEEP 2002 Manual as revised to 2024. Given that lack of direct wetland impacts and the three factors mentioned above, CLA believes that the project can be constructed without adverse impacts to inland wetlands. Please contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, ebutC Kutee Robert C. Russo CSS Appendix A Soils Data NL £2 oth N.ST€Z ofb €40 | aed vZ0Z/9L/L i M.bT9 ott M.bT9 ot Aaning [10S ge soeounosey jeunjen Y@SOM NST SUZ WL 3985p PESO ‘SeqeUIpIOOD JeLICD JOJEUeW Gay :uoqefaid dey 09 oor oz ooL 0 Red cet oz 09 3 o oN sIeW! O2DzbL, OLBLbL, OZBbbL, OLBbbL, OeBleL CLL be OZLLpL (iea ve. <4 =k ch =) 2 = id = | a vasn MSE9 oth, MEO off, NL ol Kaning |log eanesedoo5 jeuoyen ad1Mag UOI}EAIaSUOD saounosay [eINJeEN = vasn “JUOpPIAd ag Aew seuepunog yun dew jo Burylys JOUIWW SWS ‘}jNSal e Sy ‘sdew asayj uo peAejdsip Asebew! punos6yoeq 8u} Woy suayip Ajqeqod pazibip pue peyidwoo @J8M Saul] [OS a4} YOIYM UO dew aseq JeyYO JO OJOYdoULO ay, 220% ‘9}90—ZZ0Z ‘pL unr = :peydesBojoyd eam safew jeuae (s)a}eq sajeos dew JO) (smoyje sdeds se) pajaqe| ae sjiun dew jlo Ued Wa}sey ‘INdOSUUOD Jo a}eIg = :eary Aaning |10S Se B}EP Pay!e0 SONN-VGSN eu} Woy payesouas si jonpoud siy “pauinbad ase eave JO aoue\sip Jo suoReinojeo ayeuno0e QJOW J! pasn aq pinoys ‘uoNoalod d1u00 eaye-jenbe siaqiy 8} Se Yons ‘eae sajesaid yeu} uoNdelold Y “ease pue soue}sIP SHO}SIP nq adeys pue uO!aUIP senuasaid yoIyM ‘uoNoeloid JOVEN Ge au} UO pase ale Aanins |lOS gan 8u} Woy sdey (Zg8¢:9SdJ) JO}eTUEW Ge :wayshg a}eUIPICOD sTan Aening jog Ga DOMES UONLAIBSUOD SBdiNOSEY JeunjeN :deyy jo s0uno0S dew Jo) Jaays dew yoke uo ajeos Jeq ay} UO Aju asea|q pajiejap auow 2 je umoUs Us|qg aAeY PjNod jeu} sjlos BusesjUCD 40 seaue |}eLUS a4} MoUs Jou Op sdew ay) ‘JUaWsoRId aI }10s yo Adeinooe pue Buiddew Jo jleJap ay) yo Bulpueysapunsiw asneo ued Bulddew jo aje0s ay} puokeg sdew Jo juswabiejuy "9]e9S Siu} ye plea aq jou Aew dey jiog :Buiwen, ye peddew asam |OY JNOA asudwos yeu} sAesuns |I0s au. Aydes6ojoug jeuey punosbyoeg Speoy [200] speoy Jofey sainoy sn sAemyBiH 3}€}SJ9}U] ¢] seunqee 1932, saunjeay aurq jeloads Jao yods 19M yodg Auoys -- £ (3 , > o € wy) yodgopog dig soaps sows = yods papoly Ajaenag => yods auyjes pue7, uoissaidag pasojo 9 yodg AejD = Ygmouog =f) squlog Wun dey tos a saul] WUN de; los cal suobfjog wun dewiies = [|_| silos (lov) Isas9]U] Jo Bary (lov) 3s2423u] Jo easy GQN3937 dVIN QO sueqou) Wey Weaysez ‘NoO@UUOD Jo aje}GS—deyy |10S Soil Map—State of Connecticut, Eastern Part Roberts Ct Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 51B Sutton fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 44 21.6% percent slopes, very stony 60B Canton and Charlton fine 0.8 4.1% sandy loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes 60D Canton and Charlton soils, 15 AA 5.6% to 25 percent slopes 61B Canton and Charlton fine 5.4 28.0% sandy loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony 61C Canton and Charlton fine 3.9 20.2% sandy loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stony 73E Charlton-Chatfield complex, 15 141 5.6% to 45 percent slopes, very rocky 84C Paxton and Montauk fine 2.9 15.0% sandy loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 19.2 100.0% UsDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/16/2024 <= Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3