Planning & Zoning Commission (linked)
agenda center agenda
| Board/Commission | Planning & Zoning Commission |
|---|---|
| Meeting Date | November 12, 2024 |
| Pages | 2 |
| File Size | 0.5 MB |
| OCR Status | Searchable (OCR processed) |
| Source URL | Original |
Document Preview
Full Text (OCR Extracted)
Mark Wujtewicz From: William R Sweeney <wrsweeney@tcors.com> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2024 2:50 PM To: Mark Wujtewicz Ce: Jonathan Mullen; Robert Avena Subject: Old Norwich Road Driveway Easement - Roberts Village Attachments: Easement - Old Norwich Road.pdf; 12720 Minutes.pdf Se ee Se ee CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender's email address and know the | content is safe. I Mark: Please see attached. As it appears that Chairman Massad had researched this easement outside of the public hearing process, I think it is important that the record include a copy of that easement. Iam also attaching the minutes of the 1/27/20 meeting of the Commission where the adjacent three lot subdivision along Old Norwich Road was approved. There is a discussion in the minutes about the unsafe sight line issue along Old Norwich Road which led to the shared driveway being approved and located where it exists today. The terms of that shared driveway easement make clear that the Roberts Village parcel is not a benefitted property to the driveway easement. Under Section IX of the easement, any modifications (granting additional rights to the easement or relocating it for example) must be approved by all lot owners. Mr. & Mrs. Arnold, the owners of the southernmost lot, have made clear and in writing to you that they will not consent to any changes in the easement that might permit an entrance for the Roberts Village project (an additional 24 homes) onto Old Norwich Road. As such, Chairman Massad’s alternative access concept is not feasible nor is it advisable considering the substantial sight line issues previously identified by the Commission in the subdivision matter. Please add a copy of this email and the attachments to the record of the Roberts Village hearing. Thanks, Bill William R. Sweeney, Esq. | Partner Public Hearing Tobin, Carberry, O’Malley, Riley & Selinger, P.C. Roberts Court 8-3 0(g) 43 Broad Street | P.O. Box 58 | New London, CT 06320 PL-24-14 Tel: 860-447-0335 | Fax: 860-442-3469 Exhibit 24 Email: WRSweeney@tcors.com | www.tcors.com *#**WARNING: WIRE FRAUD IS ON THE RISE! **** WIRE FRAUD ALERT: E-mail hacking and fraud are on the rise to fraudulently misdirect funds. Before you wire or otherwise transfer funds to our office, you must confirm the request and any corresponding instructions by phone with our office at 860-447-0335 before you initiate any transfer. E-mail accounts of attorneys, title and closing companies, and other professionals are being targeted by hackers in an attempt to initiate fraudulent wire transfer requests. TCORS has taken cybersecurity measures to protect its e-mails against hacking, including hacking and phishing potentially aimed at fraudulent wire transfers and other fraudulent schemes, but there can be no guaranty or assurance that these measures will be completely effective. TCORS cannot be responsible for security breaches initiated on or by the client’s electronic devices and encourages each client to make sure that they have taken reasonable measures to prevent cyber fraud. TCORS facilitates wire transfers at the request of, and as a convenience to, its clients and shall not be responsible or liable for damage caused by fraudulent wire transfers or other fraudulent schemes. “This is a transmission from the law firm of Tobin, Carberry, O'Malley, Riley & Selinger, P.C. (TCORS) and may contain information which is privileged, confidential and protected by the attorney-client or attorney work product privileges. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. Please notify the originator of the message if you have received this email in error.”