Planning& Zoning Commission (linked)

Town of Waterford Office Use Only
Date submited: | OSC]
Processed By: KA
www.waterfordct.org asset PLaae | 3.
F pp. No.; Li
Department of Planning and Development
| Total Fee: $ 7
PZC Form 1 T | Electronic Submission
Waived: Yes ___—No
Planning and Zoning Application
1. Type of Application(s), Use and Property Information (check all that apply)
[_] Informal Staff Review [_| Site Plan/Design Review [__] Municipal Project (CGS§8-24)
L] Special Permit/Design Review! (= Subdivision /Resubdivision C] Lot line Adjustment
| Zoning Map Change C] Regulation Amendment(s) [| New District
| Multifamily Development C] Coastal Area Management ? CE] Earth Excavation
im Flood Hazard Area CJ Other: C] Other:
Specify all uses and corresponding section for which this application applies*:
Use, ONe-Family Dwellings 5.1.1
Section:
Use: Section:
Use: _ Section:
Name of proposed development/subdivision: Brown Resubdivision If subdivision how many lots?: 2
If applicable, are roadways proposed to be private, public or both:
J Private [J Public (] Both*
Parcel | Parcel 2
Map/Block/Lot; 102, /°6* /__ Map/Block/Lot: __/_/ i
Street No, & Name: 9 Josan Drive Street No. & Name:
Sieben SREP EN. AERO ate. Size SF/AC: /
Zoning District(s): R-40 Zoning District(s):
* Include a completed list of property owners with Parcel ID, name, address and mailing address, It is the applicant’s responsibility to distribute all
notices certified return receipt. Evidence of mailing shall be submitted prior to the start of the hearing. Failure to do so will delay the opening of the
hearing,
? Coastal Site Plan reviews under Coastal Area Management §25.4 must submit a completed PZC Form 2 in addition to this PZC Form 1,
3 The use listed must correspond to the exact use term noted within the zoning district as a permitted use allowed through site plan or special permit.
“A plan must accompany the application clearly delineating the limits of public and private roads.

2. Applicantinformation =
Ss GE ae Be | a es
Sharon Brown
Name: Applicant’s Authority to File Application®
Title: el Legal Owner of Record
Company: Power of Attorney
Address: 10 Josan Drive Contract to Purchase
City/State: Waterford CT Other
Zip Code: 06385
Telephone: Fax: Email:
3. Agent Information; if applicable
uJ
Name: Brian D. Florek, LS CFS Sues Naturoal Avent
Title: Managing Member Ailvoney
Company: Florek Surveying LLC Civil Engineer
Address: 239 Shore Road | Land Surveyor
City/State: Waterford CT Design Professional;
Zip Code: 06385 Other:
Bar/License/Reg. No.: 70135 NCFS-026
Telephone: 8602716006 Fax: Email: florek@floreksurveyinglle.com
2 ee
Is owner co-applicant? [il Yes [_]No |
4, Property Owner(s) and Parcel(s) Information
Note: If landowner is an LLC, Corporation, Trust or other legal entity, attach the names, addresses and title of each
member or officer, including agent(s). If same as applicant list ‘Same’.
Name: Sharon Brown Name:
Title: Title:
Company: Company:
Address: 10 Josan Drive Adavexs
City/State: Waterford CT City/State:
Zip Code: 06385 Zip Code:
Telephone: Telephone:
Fax: Fax:
Email: Email:
2 Applicant must submit evidence attesting to the authority to file application (i.e, deed, option for purchase, etc.)

5, Statement of Use
Attached a typed statement tof use in eonivrnanve with the Zoning Regulations as described in Section 22.4.2. In addition
include all hours and days of operation, size of buildings and number of stories, utilities servicing the parcel, variances
received, number of employee and structures to be demolished.
6. ‘Statement of Design Co
Compatibility (Site Plans andl Special Permits only) i
Attach a statement describing how the building and site design is compatible with the neighborhood, character of
Waterford and Zoning Regulations.
idk Consistency with Adopted Plan of Preservation, ‘Conservation and Development (all
; applications) |
__. _.
Attach a statement attesting to how the proposed use, zone change, amendment or design is consistent with the most
recent adopted Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development (the Plan). Note relevant Plan section numbers and
pages.
: 8 Natural and Cultural Resources
we
!
foie Sa AS Se samen ob ee a Ge saul
“No % arpanpenty
21,276 s.f.,0.49acs. 10.6%
a. Are inland wetlands present on site? Total SF/AC
b. Are tidal wetlands present on site? — Total SF/AC /
. Are their known or suspected vernal pools on the property?
COE #/.|
is hg a
d. CT DEEP NDDB: Are endangered, threatened or species of special concern suspected to be located on
the property? Applicant must attach an 8 V2 x 11 map of the most current CT DEEP Natural Diversity
Database with site clearly identified regardless of response provided. If you answered yes to item d.,
attach a letter from CT DEEP stating the name of the specie(s) that are suspected to be on the
property. See Section 22 of the Zoning Regulations for additional information.
e. Are floodplains or flood hazard areas on the property?
Zone AE 12 and Other; no construction will take place in these locations. See sheet 3
Identify:
im f. Is the property located within a local, state of national historic district?
If yes identify district name:
im g. Does the site possess any structures or sites listed on the local, state or national register of historic
landmarks?
If yes, identify:

9. Additional Information : we |
Yes No
a. Is any part of the site within 500' of the Town line? Which town:
x b. Will any egress or ingress for the property use streets within an adjoining municipality?
c. Is any work proposed in wetlands or watercourses? Explain in Statement of Use
d. Is any work proposed within 100 feet of a wetlands or watercourse? Explain in Statement of Use
Is any work proposed within a floodplain or flood hazard area? Explain in Statement of Use
f. Is public water available or proposed to the site? Identify:
g. Are public sanitary sewers available or proposed to the site? Identify:
ili ‘ . +p, Town of Water Sewer Ea! t
h. Is there a utility, drainage or other easement(s) on the site? Specify: Met EAsemen
OF EREORAOO
FOOOROOF
i. Is open space proposed on the property?
How much open space is proposed (SF/AC)? / Percent of property(s)
Use and purpose of open space:
; 10. Previous Land Use Permits Associated with the Property(s)
Have previous permits been issued for the Property: im Yes C] No (List singularly; attached additional pages if necessary)
Date Issued Issuing Agency Approved Use/Activity
July 11 Wateford Conseraton Commission Inland Wetlands Permit.

11. Change of Zone, Regulation Amendment or New Zoning District, if applicable i
Yes No
im a. Is this application for a new zoning district and/or regulation not presently established within the
Zoning Regulations? If a new zoning district, distinguish type of zone proposed:
CT] Fixed Zone
[_ ]Floating Zone
| Overlay Zone
Identify proposed zone name:
For new regulations, list proposed section number(s) and titles(s):
i.
ii.
iii.
im | b. Is this application an amendment to an existing regulation? Attach proposed amendments, clearly
noting any deletions, modifications or additions. List sections proposed to be modified:
i.
ii.
iti,
im | c. Is this application for a change to a district already established within the regulations? Identify:
Supporting materials:
For new zoning districts or a change in zone provide a legal description of the land involved in the zone district change
including the following:
e Location map at 1”=1000’
e Accurate description and acreage of tract(s) to be changed with existing buildings and uses
Show existing features including but not limited to contours at two-foot intervals, wetlands and watercourses,
flood plains, all improvements and structures,
e All lots or parts of lots contained in an area within 500 feet in all directions of the zone change tract
e All lots shown in this area and within the zone change tract shall contain the name and address of owners as
recorded in the Assessor’s records and shall show the nature of use
e North point, and distance along road from nearest road intersection.
e Scale of map(s)

"12 Bulk Zoning Requirements Table
Complete the following table, which must also be included on applicable drawings:
Zoning District(s): R40
Ttem Required Proposed
Minimum LotSize 40,000 s.f. 58,446 s.f. / 140,897 s.f.
Frontage 100 ft. 58.06 ft * / 100 ft.
Front Yard 50 ft. 200 ft. / 280 ft.
Side Yard 25 ft. 81 ft. / 50 ft.
Rear Yard 50 ft. 57 ft. / 51 ft.
Building Line As-Shown As-Shown
Building Coverage 25% 4% | 2%
Parking®
Landscaping
immpenneable Coverage 2 Lot Coverage: 17,328 s.f. or 0.40 acres
© Attach method used to determine the number of parking spaces required.

! 13. Planning, Design and Engineering Team
Provide a list of all professionals responsible for the project. Additional pages attached, if necessary: [Ives []No
Discipline, | Land Surveyor Telephone; 860.271.6006
Name: Brian D. Florek, LS CFS Fax:
Canapaige Florek Surveying LLC eail: bflorek@floreksurveyingllc.com
License(s)/ License(s)/
Accreditations: LS 70,135 Accreditation No(s): CFS NCFS-026
Discipline, Professional Engineer Telephone: 860.966.5528
es David Cooley, PE Fax:
Company: Cooley Engineering Services Email: dicengineeringservicesllc@gmail.com
Licenses and/or License/
Accreditations: PE 24,892 Accreditation No(s):
Discipline: Telephone:
Name: Fax:
Company: Email:
Licenses and/or License/
Accreditations: Accreditation No(s):
Discipline: Telephone:
Name: Fax:
Company: Email:
Licenses and/or License/
Accreditations: Accreditation No(s):
Discipline: Telephone:
Name: Fax:
Company: Email:
Licenses and/or License/
Accreditations:
Accreditation No(s):

‘14. Supporting Documentation !
Itemize, including additional attachments, all information provided in support of the application. Titles, dates and
sheet/map numbers shall correspond exactly with the corresponding information provided.
Additional pages attached, if necessary: im Yes im No
Brown Resubdivision Sheets 1-4
15. ‘For Informal Staff Review Use Only
Sec. 7-159b — Pre-application review of use of property. Notwithstanding any other provision of the general statutes,
prior to the submission of an application for use of property under chapters 124, 126, 440 and 541 or any other provision
of the general statutes authorizing an authority, commission, department or agency of a municipality to issue a permit or
approval for use of such property, such authority, commission, department or agency or authorized agent thereof may
separately, jointly, or in any combination, conduct a pre-application review of a proposed project with the applicant at
the applicant's request. Such pre-application review and any results or information obtained from it may not be appealed
under any provision of the general statutes, and shall not be binding on the applicant or any authority, commission,
department, agency or other official having jurisdiction to review the proposed project.
I have read and understand the above provision of the Connecticut General Statutes and understand and agree that
whatever discussion, comments and/or recommendations are made through this review are non-binding upon the parties,
Further, I acknowledge and agree that this pre-application review meeting is being conducted prior to and in anticipation
of a formal application to the Waterford Planning and Zoning Commission or Conservation Commission to obtain
feedback and response to the proposal or design, as it exists on this date, in the interest of preparing an application
consistent with the Subdivision, Zoning or Wetlands regulations of the Town of Waterford as the case may be.
Signature Printed Name Date
Sharon Brown 2Blacas
Applicant
T
Agent
Mireur Grow Shavon Brown 3 [2 /A0aD
Land Owner
Land Owner

: 16. Technical Assistance Review Fee
In accordance with the Waterford Code of Ordinance Chapter 16.08, the Commission may require third party technical
assistance review for the evaluation of applications associated with but not limited to site plans, special permits, zone
change and regulation amendments and may collect payment for costs associated with the review. This includes but is not
limited to civil engineering, architecture, legal assistance, traffic engineering and environmental protection.
| 17. Acknowledgements; All applications i
Application Content
The undersigned herby acknowledges that this application and statements submitted herewith are true to the best of my
knowledge and approval of the application is contingent upon compliance with all requirements of said regulations.
Right of Entry and Inspection
The undersigned hereby authorizes the Waterford Planning and Zoning Commission or its agents, to enter the subject
property for the purposes of inspection and enforcement for the said Zoning Regulations until receipt of final Certificate
of Occupancy and Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
Electronic Data Accuracy and Transmission
If applicable, the undersigned hereby acknowledges that all electronic data submitted as part of this application is an
accurate and true representation of all paper transmissions provided as part of this application and may be transmitted
publically when requested and all applicable fees are paid in full by the requesting party.
Signature Printed Name Date
Alvown Puc Shoron Brow 3||085
Applicant
“GAM “5 OFS Btrns Treare_ 3[5 les
Agent
Nv Br Sharon Brown 232005
Ww
Land Owner
Land Owner

Office Use Only
Date Submitted] lac loc
Processed By: 4 WA
App. No.: LOS!
Rev: 07/24/14
PZC Form 2:
Application for Coastal Area Management Site Plan Permit
Property Address: 9 Josan Drive
1, General
a. This form must be submitted in conjunction with PZC Form 1: Planning and Zoning Application or, in the case of
minor activities and if permitted by the Zoning Enforcement Officer, Zoning Compliance Permit.
b. This form does not supersede or take the place of any state or federal permits. The applicant shall consult with the
necessary agencies to review the possibility of additional permits, including general or individual permits that may be
required for specific activities.
2. Authority
Consistent with Connecticut General Statues ,Chapter 444, Secs, 22a-90 to 22a-113j, Waterford’s Planning and Zoning
Commission, acting in the capacity of the Town’s Zoning Commission, regulates certain activities upon properties which
lie completely or partially within the coastal area as defined by CGS §22a-94(b). Specifically, the Commission’s is
authorized, cited in part, by the following:
Sec. 22a-105. Coastal site plan reviews. (a) Coastal municipalities shall undertake coastal site plan reviews in
accordance with the requirements of this chapter.
(b) The following site plans, plans and applications for activities or projects to be located fully or partially within the
coastal boundary and landward of the mean high water mark shall be defined as “coastal site plans” and shall be subject to
the requirements of this chapter: (1) Site plans submitted to a zoning commission in accordance with section 22a-109; (2)
plans submitted to a planning commission for subdivision or resubdivision in accordance with section 8-25 or with any
special act; (3) applications for a special exception or special permit submitted to a planning commission, zoning
commission or zoning board of appeals in accordance with section 8-2 or with any special act; (4) applications for a
variance submitted to a zoning board of appeals in accordance with subdivision (3) of section 8-6 or with any special act,
and (5) a referral of a proposed municipal project to a planning commission in accordance with section 8-24 or with any
special act.

3.
a, By placing a check mark in the appropriate box(es), identify the coastal resources and their policies for each that is
located on and adjacent to the property or that may be influenced by the activities associated with the application.
Note: A resources may be located on site, adjacent and be off-site but influenced by the activities. Refer to CGS §22a-
92(a) for General Coastal Resource Policy, CGS§221-92(b)(2) and CGS §22a-93(7) for definitions of each
corresponding policy’s coastal resource.
Coastal Resources and Policies
Semen en cas eel
Coastal Resource
On-site
Adjacent
Off-site but
within
Influence
General Coastal Resources
Beaches and Dunes
Bluffs & Escarpments
Coastal Hazard Area
Coastal Waters, Estuarine Embayments,
Nearshore Waters, Offshore Waters
Development Shorefront
Freshwater Wetlands and Watercourses
Intertidal Flats
Islands
Rocky Shorefront
Shellfish Concentration Area
Shorelands
Coastal Hazard Area ID Type (i.e. VE, A, etc.)
NA
NA
Base Flood Elevation
NA
NA
Tidal Wetlands
b. Consistency with Coastal Resources and Policies.
Attached a typed and briefly statement of how the resources checked are consistent or inconsistent with coastal
resource policies.

4. Coastal Use and Activities Policies and Standards , ee |
a. Identify all coastal policies and standards in or referenced by CGS Section 22a-92 applicable to the proposed
project or activity:
i] General Development _] Sewer and Water Lines
C] Water-Dependent Uses CT] Energy Facilities
im Ports and Harbors C] Fuel, Chemicals and Hazardous Materials
im Coastal Structures and Filling im Transportation
C] Dredging and Navigation ia Solid Waste
im Boating CT] Dams, Dikes and Reservoirs
L] Fisheries im Cultural Resources
im Coastal Recreation and Access im Open Space and Agricultural Lands
b. Consistency With Applicable Coastal Use Policies And Standards
Attach an explanation of how the proposed activity or use is consistent with all of the applicable coastal use and
activity policies and standards identified in Part V. For projects proposed at waterfront sites (including those with
tidal wetlands frontage), particular emphasis should be placed on the evaluation of the project’s consistency with
the water-dependent use policies and standards contained in CGS Sections 22a-92(a)(3) and 22a-92(b)(1)(A) --
also see adverse impacts assessment in Part VII.B below:
5, Mitigation of Adverse Impacts and Overall Consistency (all applications)
Attach a summary addressing each of the following:
a. Describe the methods proposed to mitigate any adverse impacts.
b. Explain why adverse impacts are not being mitigated, if applicable.
G Summarize why the project as proposed is consistent with the Connecticut Coastal Management Act

c.
Identification of Potential Adverse Impacts on Coastal Resources
Please complete this section for all projects. Identify the adverse impact categories below that apply to the
proposed project or activity. The applicable column must be checked if the proposed activity has the potential to
generate any adverse impacts as defined in CGS Section 22a-93(15). If an adverse impact may result from the
proposed project or activity, please use Part VIII to describe what project design features may be used to
eliminate, minimize, or mitigate the potential for adverse impacts.
Mitigation
Potential Adverse Impacts on Coastal Resources Applicable. Not Applicable Proposed
i, Degrading tidal wetlands, beaches and dunes,
rocky shorefronts, and bluffs and escarpments C] im
through significant alteration of their natural
characteristics or functions
ii. Increasing the hazard of coastal flooding through
significant alteration of shoreline configurations or im C
bathymetry, particularly within high velocity
flood zones - CGS Section 22a-93(15)(E)
iii. Degrading existing circulation patterns of coastal
water through the significant alteration of patterns im im
of tidal exchange or flushing rates, freshwater input,
or existing basin characteristics and channel contours
iv. Degrading natural or existing drainage patterns
through the significant alteration of groundwater LC] CO
flow and recharge and volume of runoff
v. Degrading natural erosion patterns through the
significant alteration of littoral transport of sediments O O
in terms of deposition or source reduction
vi. Degrading visual quality through significant alteration
Xx
of the natural features of vistas and view points U =
vii. Degrading water quality through the significant
introduction into either coastal waters or groundwater
supplies of suspended solids, nutrients, toxics, heavy O |
metals or pathogens, or through the significant alteration
of temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen or salinity
viii. Degrading or destroying essential wildlife, finfish, or
shellfish habitat through significant alteration of the
composition, migration patterns, distribution, breeding OJ LO
or other population characteristics of the natural species
or significant alterations of the natural components of
the habitat

, ]
1 6. ” Potential Adverse Impacts on ‘Wate‘dependent Uses (for project or activity is propased ata ererfione site) |
a. Identification of existing and/or proposed Water-dependent Uses: Attach a description of the features or
characteristics of the proposed activity or project that qualify as water-dependent uses as defined in CGS Section
22a-93(16). If general public access to coastal waters is provided, please identify the legal mechanisms used to
ensure public access in perpetuity, and describe any provisions for parking or other access to the site and proposed
amenities associated with the access (e.g., boardwalk, benches, trash receptacles, interpretative signage, etc.)”:
b. Identify the adverse impact categories below that apply to the proposed project or activity. The applicable column
must be checked if the proposed activity has the potential to generate any adverse impacts as defined in CGS
Section 22a-93(17), If an adverse impact may result from the proposed project or activity, use Part VIII to
describe what project design features may be used to eliminate, minimize, or mitigate the potential for adverse
impacts.
Potential Adverse Impacts on Future Water-dependent Mitigation
Development Opportunities and Activities Applicable Not Applicable Proposed
i Locating a non-water-dependent use at a
site physically suited for or planned for location of a LJ U
water-dependent use
ii. Replacing an existing water-dependent use C] im
with a non-water dependent use
iii. Siting a non-water-dependent use which oO LC]
would substantially reduce or inhibit existing public
access to marine or tidal waters
, 7 _ Acknowledgements; All applications \
Application Content
The undersigned herby acknowledges that this application and statements submitted herewith are true to the best of my
knowledge and approval of the application is contingent upon compliance with all requirements of said regulations.
Noe Go Printed Name Date
ahs Sharon Brown 3312088
ou. “ES [aa als fae
i Kn Shoron Bown 3 (3| 2005
Land Owner
Land Owner

Florek Surveying, LLC
239 Shore Road FLOREK
Waterford, CT 06385 esx Bon
(860) 271-6006 :
bflorek@FlorekSurveyingLLC.com SURE &
September 24, 2025
Planning & Zoning Commission
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Brown Re-Subdivision — 9 Josan Drive
Dear Members of the Commission,
On behalf of Sharon Brown, please find enclosed the supporting documentation for the proposed
re-subdivision of 9 Josan Drive into two residential building lots. The submission package includes:
° Statement of Use
* Consistency with the Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development (POCD)
¢ Statement of Design Compatibility
The proposed lots will be served by municipal sewer, municipal water, and underground utilities,
and the project has received prior Conservation Commission approval (C-24-06). We believe this
application is consistent with the Town’s regulations and the character of the surrounding
neighborhood.
Please accept this package for review at your next regularly scheduled meeting. Should you require
any additional information or revisions, do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Se 2 Yl es CFS
Brian D. Florek, LS, CFS
Managing Member
Florek Surveying, LLC

Florek Surveying, LLC
239 Shore Road FLOREK
Waterford, CT 06385 EST. 2014
(860) 271-6006
bflorek@FlorekSurveyingLLC.com ea
September 24, 2025
Planning & Zoning Commission
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Brown Re-Subdivision
Consistency with Adopted Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development:
Sharon Brown proposes the creation of two (2) residential building lots at 9 Josan Drive. Both lots
will be serviced by municipal sewer, municipal water, and underground electric/communications
utilities. Josan Drive is a traditional residential subdivision, and the construction of two homes will fit
the character of the neighborhood.
This re-subdivision represents a low-impact use of vacant land within an existing residential area.
The proposed impervious areas associated with the two homes will not increase water flow due to
design measures including rain gardens, check dams, and channeled slopes along the proposed
driveway.
Sincerely,
Mh 2 Yd. es CFS
Brian D. Florek, LS, CFS
Managing Member
Florek Surveying, LLC

Florek Surveying, LLC
239 Shore Road FLOREK
Waterford, CT 06385 ae sia
(860) 271-6006
bflorek@FlorekSurveyingLLC.com ee
September 24, 2025
Planning & Zoning Commission
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Brown Re-Subdivision
Statement of Use:
Sharon Brown proposes the creation of two (2) residential building lots at 9 Josan Drive. Both lots
will be serviced by municipal sewer, municipal water, and underground electric/communications
utilities.
9 Josan Drive received Conservation Commission approval (C-24-06) on July 11, 2024. A small
area of wetlands exists near the driveway entrance, created by construction of the Josan Drive
cul-de-sac. This area will be protected by the placement of boulders and signage.
The subject property includes floodplain areas at the southwestern corner. No construction is
proposed in this area, and it will remain protected under Conservation Approval C-24-06.
This re-subdivision will require a waiver of the Flag Lot Regulations (Section 5.3.8). Lot 1 has 58.08
feet of frontage, less than the required 100 feet. The characteristics of Josan Drive will not be impaired
by granting this waiver, as there are no other flag lots on the street. As a re-subdivision, the waiver
remains consistent with the regulation that no more than 20% of the lots shall be flag lots.
Sincerely,
She 2 Ul es CS
Brian D. Florek, LS, CFS
Managing Member
Florek Surveying, LLC

Florek Surveying, LLC
239 Shore Road FLOREK
Waterford, CT 06385 EST. 2014
(860) 271-6006
bflorek@FlorekSurveyingLLC.com eae ae
September 24, 2025
Planning & Zoning Commission
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
RE: Brown Re-Subdivision
Statement of Design Compatibility:
Sharon Brown proposes the creation of two (2) residential building lots at 9 Josan Drive. Both lots
will be serviced by municipal sewer, municipal water, and underground electric/communications
utilities. Josan Drive is a traditional residential subdivision, and the construction of two homes will fit
the character of the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
She 2 Ul es CFS
Brian D. Florek, LS, CFS
Managing Member
Florek Surveying, LLC