Representative Town Meeting Annual Meeting Materials (linked)

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
ODP
o
-zro@mm
Pledge of Allegiance
PHONE: 860-442-0553
www.waterfordct.org
AGENDA
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
Monday, December 6, 2021
7:00pm — Waterford Town Hall
91:6 WY €2 AOR 1202
Roll Call
To elect a moderator of the Representative Town Meeting to serve for a term of
one year. (Charter 3.1.12, C)
To consider and act upon the minutes of the October 4, 2021 Regular Meeting,
October 28, 2021 Special Meeting, and the November 29, 2021 Special Meeting
Correspondence
Public Comment
. Committee reports and referrals
Appointee & Liaison updates
Transaction of Business on the Call;
1. To consider and act upon a recommendation from the Board of Finance to
transfer $1.8 million from the General Operating Fund Balance into the
Capital Non-Recurring Undesignated Fund Balance in anticipation of
future paving projects.
. To consider and act upon a motion to discuss strategy and/or negotiations
with respect to multiple collective bargaining agreements in executive
session.
To consider and act upon a motion to approve the funds necessary to
implement the Tentative Agreement between the Town of Waterford and
Waterford Professional Firefighters Association Local 4629 International
Association of Firefighters AFL-CIO, covering the period July 1, 2021-June
30, 2024.
To consider and act upon a vacancy on the Personnel Review Board.
(Term 12/01/2021 — 11/30/2024)
To consider and act upon a vacancy on the Personnel Review Board due
to the resignation of Edward Murphy. (Term 12/01/2019 — 11/30/2022)

6. To consider and act upon a vacancy on the Ethics Commission due to a
resignation by Steve Garvin. (Term 02/01/2021 — 02/06/2023)
7. The establishment of the Committee on Committees membership by the
moderator.
8. To consider and act upon the recommendation of the committee on
committees of the membership of the Standing Committees of the RTM.
9. To consider and act upon the RTM appointments to the Information
Technology Committee, Long Range Fiscal Pianning Committee, and the
School Building Committee.
10.To consider and act upon two appointments to the Retirement
Commission. (Term 01/01/2022 — 12/31/2023)
11.To consider and act upon two RTM appointments to the Social Services
Grants Review Board. (Term 12/06/2021 ~ 12/05/2022)
12.To consider and act upon the proposed schedule of regular meetings for
the 2022 calendar year.
13.To consider and act upon a proposed Representative Town Meeting
budget for fiscal year 2022-23 in the amount of $18,903.
J. New Business
K. Adjournment

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
PHONE: 860-442-0553
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
www. waterfordct.org
MINUTES
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING
Regular Meeting
Waterford Town Hall
October 4, 2021
ay iA 9- 150 1282
RTM Moderator Thanias Dembek called the October 4, 2021 Regular Meeting of the Representative
Town Meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Greg Attanasio, Michael Bono, Jennifer Bracciale, April Cairns, Timothy Condon, Thomas J.
Dembek, Susan Driscoll, Steve Elci, Timothy Fioravantl, Miriam Furey-Wagner, Nick Gauthier, Paul
Goldstein, Kathleen Kohl, David Lersch, Valerie Metivier, Richard Morgan, Richard Muckle, Dah Radin,
Michael Rocchetti (7:20 P.M.), Danielle Steward-Gelinas, Robert Swansen, Baird Welch-Collins.
ABSENT: Liam O’Leary, Theodore Olynciw.
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT: First Selectman Robert J Brule; Chair of the Board of Finance Ronald R.
Fedor.
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT: Selectwoman Jody Nazarchyk; Selectman Elizabeth Sabilia; Chair of the
Board of Education Craig Merriman.
ALSO PRESENT: Town Clerk David L. Carnpo; Town Attomey Robert Avena, Town Attorney Nicholas
Kepple.
AGENDA ITEM C ~ August 2, 2021 Regular Meeting & the August 19,.2021 Special Meeting Minutes
MOTION by Goldstein, seconded by Welch-Collins, to accept the minutes from the August 2, 2021
Regular Meeting and the August. 19, 2021 Special Meeting.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous with one member abstaining. (Steward-Gelinas)
CORRESPONDENCE (See Attachment)
A letter from Chief of Police, Brett Mahoney, in reference to the Town's Noise Ordinance. Moderator
Dembek stated it would be discussed under NEW BUSINESS.
An Ethics advisory opinion was received from the Ethics Commission.
A letter from Waterford Resident, Mary Childs, in regard to city water pipes in her neighborhood and
throughout Town. Moderator Dembek stated it would be discussed under NEW BUSINESS,
A letter from Town Clerk, David L. Campo, requesting a review of Chapter 2.38 — Information Technology
Committee, Moderator Dembek stated it would be discussed under NEW BUSINESS,
1 RTM MINUTES 10/04/2021

PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following residents spoke against the volume of the live music at Filomena’s on Boston Post Road
and the need to review the Town's noise ordinance; William F, O’Donnell, 7 Reynolds Lane; Adel Terzik,
134 Fog Plain Road; Candace Barsch, 275 Boston Post Road; William Herzfeld, 6 Graham Street; Debbie
Griffith, 63 North Road.
MOTION by Welch-Collins, seconded by Gauthier, to move NEW BUSINESS up at this point.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
NEW BUSINESS
Lengthy discussion ensued in regard for the need to review the Town’s Noise Ordinance as referenced in
a letter from Chief of Police, Brett Mahoney, and noted by residents during PUBLIC COMMENT.
MOTION by Welch-Collins, seconded by Steward-Gelinas, to refer the review of the Noise Ordinance
(Chapter 9.06 ~ Noise Control) to the Public Health, Recreation & Environment Standing Committee of
the RTM.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
MOTION by Weich-Collins, seconded by Driscoll, to Review the information Technology Committee
Ordinance (Chapter 2.38), as referenced in a letter from Town Clerk, David L. Campo.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
A letter from Nicholas Kepple, Town Attorney in regard to a possible panhandling ordinance.
Discussion ensued. (See attachment)
MOTION by Condon, seconded by Welch-Colfins, to have legal keep us apprised of any changes to this
issue, but to not refer to committee at this time.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
AGENDA ITEM F
Committee reports were received from David Lersch, Chair of the Finance, Wage and Personnel
Committee and from Danielle Steward-Gelinas, Chair of the Education Committee.
AGENDA ITEM G — None
CALL ITEM 1 ~ Rope Ferry Road & Jordan Village Sidewalks,
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Welch-Collins, to approve a recommendation from the Board of
Finance to approve a transfer in the amount of $3,000 from account 33022-55887 Rope Ferry Road
Sidewaiks to account 20511-57856 Jordan Village Sidewalks.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
2 RTM MINUTES 10/04/2021

CALL ITEM 2 — Cohanzie Fire Roof Replacement
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Weich-Collins, to pass over as it was supplied to the RTM for
“information purposes only”.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
CALL ITEM 3 — Merging of Two Lines for Hydraulic Equipment
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Welch-Callins, to approve a recommendation from the Board of
Finance the merging of two fines in our Capital Non-Recurring (CNR) designated, under Hydraulic
Equipment 20523-57826 and Line 20523-57837 into 20523-57826 by transferring $150,000 designated
funds from 20523-57837 to 20523-57826 designated, then close line 20523-57837.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous with one member abstaining. (Driscoll)
CALL ITEM 4— Wastewater Agreement
PRESENTATION: Utility Commission Chairman Ken Kirkman, Town Attorney Nicholas Kepple, Utility
Commission Director Tali Soto, Utility Commission Assistant Director James Bartelli.
MOTION by Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Welch-Collins, to approve a recommendation from the Board
of Selectmen to approve an agreement entitled “New London/Waterford/East Lyme Wastewater
Collection, Conveyance, and Treatment Agreement” and authorize the First Selectman to sign said
agreement on behalf of the Town of Waterford, subject to the approval of the Town Attorney as to
form.
Discussion ensued
MOTION by Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Welch-Colfins to move the question.
VOTING IN FAVOR TO MOVE: Unanimous
VOTING IN FAVOR OF WASTEWATER AGREEMENT: Unanimous
Moderator Dembek requested that the letter received from Mary Childs under correspondence be
discussed during the next Utility Commission Meeting.
MOTION by Condon, seconded by Welch-Collins, to adjourn at 8:39 P.M.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
Respectfully Submitted,
Dred 4 Longer —
David L. Campo, CCTC
Waterford Town Cferk
3 RTM MINUTES 10/04/2021

WATERFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
41 AVERY LANE
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2819
Brett Mahoney (860) 442-9451 TEL
Chief of Police bmahoney@waterfordct.org
David Campo
Town Clerk
Town of Waterford
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, Connecticut
06385
09/20/2024
Town Clerk Campo «
The Town of Waterford noise ordinance is Presently unworkable for enforcement, The noise levels
currently set in the ordinance do not allow the various municipal departments to. apply the ordinance as
they are now set at a normal convetsational tone, Foi the police department, this has led to the local
prosecutor's office unwilling to bring our noise complaints for prosecution.
t have spoken with the Town Attorney regarding this matter, Asa result, { am tequesting that the RTM
place this into new business for October, for subcommittee review and revision: The Town Attorney is
available and willing to work with the subcommittee, and has workable ordinances from. other
municipalities for review.
Tharik you for your consideration in. this mattet, and as always, should you have any questions, please
contact me,
Brett Mahoney
Chief of Police
Waterford Police Department
www.waterfordpolice.org
G0:6 RY 02 dds (202

The Town of Waterford Ethics Commission presents this Advisory Opinion, which applies to all
public officials of the Town of Waterford (defined as members of Boards and Commissions and
Town Officials, whether elected or appointed, in concurrence with the Code of Ethics Sec.
2,50.020 H).
As in any smaii town, public officials may find themselves involved in vates on policies, budgets,
and other decisions that may directly affect themselves or their farnily members. Waterford
maintains a Code of Ethics that specifies when a board or commission member should not take
Official action. Further, the Town of Waterford Ethics Commission previously published
advisories about when action by a Town official is ethically improper, Fallowing inquiries and
complaints, and in response to a subsequently requested Advisory Opinion to address the
relationship conflict question, this Opinion is an effort to State situations in which public officials
should refrain from voting.
The Preamble to the Code of Ethics, in Sec. 2.50.010 B, states, “The proper operation of town
government requires that all public officials and town employees shall be impartial and
responsive to the public interest, that public office and employment should not be used for
personal gain or advantage, and that public officials and town employees should not place
themselves in positions where private interest conflicts with pubic duty.”
This Advisory Opinion specifically addresses the meaning and intent of the Code in its definition
of conflict of interest. It comes as a result of a series of concerns and complaints made by
community members over the years. it acknowledges that previous opinions have not explicitly
defined instances where a conflict may exist and reflects a desire to ensure confidence in
government. This Opinion recognizes that the Waterford Ethics Commission is adjusting its
posture on the question of family relative conflicts, and is taking a specific position on this
question —one that we have long debated.
Sec. 2.560.030 A of the Code defines the existence of a substantial conflict of interest as follows:
“Public officials and town employees have an interest that is in substantial conflict with the
proper discharge of duties or employment in the public interest and of responsibilities as
prescribed by the laws of this state if they have reason to believe or expect that they, their
immediate family, or a business with which they are associated will derive a direct monetary .
gain or suffer a direct monetary loss, as the case may be, by reason of their official activity.” The
Code further states, in Sec. 2.50.030 C, that “A public official or town employee may not take
official action on any matter in which a substantial conflict (as defined in subsection A of this.
section) exists. If the conflict is disclosed, a public official or town employee may participate in
discussions with or give opinions or recommendations to a town board, agency, commission,
committee, department, or another public official or town employee.”

These sections of the Code preclude public officials fram taking actions where a conflict of
interest exists. Such conflict includes circumstances where a benefit - real or perceived - would
accrue to the official, their family, or their business relations as result of such action. Public
officials take official action when they vote “yes” or “no” where this type of question is before
them. This Advisory Opinion does not intend to restrict or limit any representative from full and
active discussion and examination of any and all issues that come before them, as is provided in
Sec. 2.50.030. {t is, however, our opinion that public officials must abstain from voting in
situations in which circumstances exist that give rise to a conflict of interest ora public
perception of such a conflict. Examples include situations. when the Board or Commission
member is employed by the Town, has a family member employed by the Town, has a business
relationship with the Town, or is in a circumstance that gives rise to a perception of conflict of
interest.
{t should be noted that this opinion resolves the issue of whether a real or perceived conflict of
interest takes precedence over the exception allowed in Sec. 2.50.030 B: “Public officials or
town employees do not have an Interest that is in substantial conflict...if any benefit or
detriment accrues to them, their immediate family, or a business with which they are associated
as a member of a profession, occupation, or group to no greater extent than any other member
of such profession, occupation, or group.” For example, a town official is not immune or exempt
from a real or perceived conflict of interest when voting on issues affecting a family member in
a collective bargaining unit. Actions taken by public officials that appear to the public as
improper will determine the existence of a conflict and, subsequently, determine the
appropriateness of the behavior.
This Advisory Opinion is broad and is intended to be applicable to ail Town activities, including
the Board of Education; public safety and fire services; and the Town’s numerous permanent
and temporary Boards, Commissions, and committees. It supercedes previous Opinions on this
issue and presents a specific position for all future Town activities. It is the result of
investigation into a specific complaint and the subsequent request for an Advisory Opinion that
followed that investigation. (in accordance with the code 2.50.060 C, it should be noted that
the results of our investigation into the complaint may be different if different facts are
presented to the Commission at a later date.) This Opinion applies to future situations only; it
clarifies the meaning and intent of the Code in its definition of conflict of interest and gives
guidance to Officials as they work on behalf of the Town. It ls intended to secure and keep
public confidence in our volunteer and elected officials.

David Campo
From: Mary Childs <childsmm@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 6:54 AM
To: David Campo
Subject: water leaks resulting in road repair
Dear Mr. Campo, | would like the following message to be shared with all RTM members. | have sent an individual
message to each email listed on our town site. The email address posted for Mr. Dembek was undeliverable. Thank you,
Mary Childs
Dear RTM member,
lam writing to ask that the current practice and response to leaking fresh water in our town roads be reviewed. For at
least the past 7 years, my neighborhood has experienced places where the main freshwater pipe leaks or at times
gushes. The Veolia crew comes to cut open the read, repair the area and then patch the road. Typically, this same place
will leak within one to two months later, | have seen this happen specifically on Beacon Hill Road and Roger's Hill Road.
This summer, the trash/recycling truck tires went through the road in a trough like series of holes.
When | inquired with our Waterford Utility Commission, | was given the explanation that when the system was new,
Waterford utilized “new” and “cost effective” technology that was a better price than copper. It was further explained
to me that this product which is plastic is now failing and needs to be frequently replaced. | was told that my
neighborhood is not the only area in town facing this issue.
As an RTM member, | ask that with the signing off on both the fresh waster coming into our homes and the wastewater
being processed going out of our homes, that you advocate for a fix to this failing technology that will replace the
couplings with possibly a more expensive and more long lasting technology, Possibly we should look into the long term
costs of replacing each coupling as it fails and factor that in to the current practice. In the months of August and
September, Beacon Hill Drive has been in repair no less than 7 times. As | stated this type of work has been going on in
my neighborhood for at least 7 years,
| appreciate your time, and hope that you will ask questions of our professionals who are in charge of contracts and
maintaining our vital water systems. Please do not just rubber stamp another 20 or 30 year contract with out some
explanation and plan to address this issue.
Respectfully,
Mary Childs
22 Beacon Hill Drive, Waterford
childsmm@yahoo.com
Sent from Mail for Windows

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
PHONE: 860-442-0553
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
www. waterfordct.org
October 2, 2024
Thomas Dembek,. Moderator
Representative Town Meeting
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Dear Mr. Dembek,
The Town has recently established its own Information Technology Department, rather than in
cooperation with the Board of Education. During internal conversations between multiple Department
Heads the need for the Information Technology Committee may be no more.
Please consider referring this subject to the proper committee to review as to whether there still exists g
need for Chapter 2.38 - Information Technology in the Waterford Code of Ordinances. With the
upcoming departure of the Chair of the Committee, Brett Mahoney, it may be an ideal time to consider
this. He would still be available for a short time to answer any questions that the RTM may have,
Sincerely,
RYT Longoy—~
David L. Campo, ccTc
Waterford Town Clerk
90: Hd 1-190 1202

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT. 06385-2886
PHONE: 860-442-0554
www.watertondetorg
Finance, Wage, and Personnel RTM Standing Committee
Year End Report 10/04/2021:
Members: Susan Driscoll, Paul Goldstein, Kathy Kohl, Liam.O’Leary, David Lersch, Chairman
The RTM voted to give two tasks tathis Standing Committee. The first task was to consider
vendor preferences far Town of Waterford businesses seeking work for the Town. The
‘Standing Committee recommended an amendment to the Town Ordnance 3.08 ~ Purchasing.
The RTM approved the Amendment. The Finance Department will. modify its internal policy
‘documents.to reflect the Amendment, based on their legal authority, as recommended by the
Town’s Attorney, and provide feedback to the RTM.
The second Task was to review and_act.on Salaries of Elected Officials that would be effective as
‘of July 1, 2022. (Note: The RTM approved 2 prior salary increases for one-year increments for
the period of July 1 2020 ta June.30, 2022). The prior Standing Committee based their salary
recommendations on the October CPI-U of the previous year. Although this Standing
‘Committee met once'to discuss the task, it did not act on the task.or make-a recommendation
tothe RTM,
itis the opinion of the Standing Committee Chairman that the RTM delegate this task'to the
newly elected members to the Standing Committee. The Standing Committee may wish to
review. resaurces and deliberations.on file, and consider the October CPI-U, as decisions are
reached in the next Fiscal-Year Town budget cycle.
As Chairman of the Finance, Wage, and Persorinel Standing Committee, | wish to offer my
sincere gratitude and thanks to every Conimittee member for their devoted. service. and
steadfast commitment to excellence,
Respectfully Submitted,

Education Standing Committee of the RTM
End of Term Committee Report
October 4, 2021
mTM
f—J
=
Members: 3
3
Danielle Steward-Gelinas, Chair &
Michael Rocchetti “0
Valerie Metivier =
. n
Greg Attanasio -
Sally Ritchie re
Two issues were sent to this committee during the 2019-2021 term of the RTM. The
Restoration/Use of Nevin’s Cottage was placed into committee prior to the beginning of this
term and was reported out on December 1, 2020. Social Justice was placed into committee on
October 5, 2020 and reported out of committee on March 15, 2021. ‘
Restoration/Use of Nevin’s Cottage:
This item has been in this particular committee for over 2 years, Money was appropriated to
obtain the fult estimate to secure the envelope. The estimation includes only the exterior and
structure of the cottage and does not address the interior of the structure. There has been
discussion about fundraising or creating an endowment fund to support the restoration. There
has also been discussion of conducting a survey to gauge interest in this project. There was a
motion and unanimous vote to move this issue out of committee with no action taken.
Social Justice:
The issues of diversity, equity and inclusion are important to the town of Waterford. Many
different groups are engaged in the conversation and Elizabeth McGee is working to create a
DEI workgroup that will more specifically address the issues described in the letter from
residents. A motion by Greg Attanasio, seconded by Michael Rocchetti, to recommend
reporting the issue of “Social Justice” out of committee at the next meeting of the RTM and
allow LEAP Consulting Owner, Elizabeth McGee, to pursue the formation of a Town DEI Work
Group, that would be representative of the town, and that the RTM makes a formal request to
have representation on the work group. The motion passed unanimously,
All meetings are recorded for public viewing.
There are currently no active issues in the Education Standing Committee of the RTM.
Respectfully submitted,
Danielle Steward-Gelinas
Chairperson

MEMORANDUM
TO: RTM MODERATOR, THOMAS DEMBECK AND ALL RTM MEMBERS
FROM: NICHOLAS KEPPLE, TOWN ATTORNEY ME
RE: REFERRAL TO RTM COMMITTEE OF POSSIBLE PANHANDLING ORDINANCE
DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2021
The United States Sugreme Court in the 2016 case of Reed v Town of Gilbert created what
amounts to a sea change in municipalities’ ability to regulate panhandling by ordinance. The Court ruled
the overwhelming majority of such ordinances, lika the City of Middletown’s 2004 ordinance attached
hereto, are unconstitutional (based on First Amendment/free speech grounds). Panhandling has along
history of jurisprudence with different Federal Circuit Courts adopting varying positions on the legality of
municipal efforts to regulate panhandling. The Reed case established a definitive view that panhandling
is considered protected speech under the first amendment and any efforts to regulate this activity are
subject to what is known as “strict scrutiny.”
Municipalities all over the country have been struggling with the fallout from the Reed decision,
especially since the COVID pandemic has precipitated a notable increase in panhandling in numerous
communities, Many Connecticut communities are endeavoring to adopt multi-faceted approaches,
which attempt to address some of the underlying causes of panhandling in the hopes of meeting some
of the core needs of Individuals engaged in these activities.
We would recommend that Representative Olynciw’s request for a referral-on this topic be
acted upon in order to afford us an opportunity to work with the relevant RTM Subcommittee. Gur
suggested approach would be to examine how other Connecticut cammunities have tried to respond to
the {egal challenges posed by the Reed case as well as learn lessons from the collaborative efforts of
different Town departments and social service agencies working on this issue. Enforcement is also.a
difficult issue that confronts Towns with prohibitions on panhandling.
We would also recommend considerable caution be exercised while exploring the regulation of
this protected activity lest the Town find itself in Court defending a new ordinance while the law post-
Reed is still In such a state of flux.
SIH HY Q~ 190 1202

HISTORY: Adopted by the Common Council of the City of Middletown 4-6-1987, as amended through Ord. No. 08-04,
opted 5-3-2004, Subsequent amendinents noted where applicable. }
§ 192-1 Definitions.
\s used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
OITER
To sit, stand, lie, pace or otherwise remain in essentially the same place, and shall include the colloquial
expression “hanging around.”
?UBLIC PLACE
Any area that is used or held out for use by the public, whether owned or operated by public or private interests.
§ 192-2 Prohibited conduct.
io person shail loiter in any public place and:
A.
use
Create, or cause to be created, a breach of the peace, as that term is defined in the Connecticut General Statutes;
Create, or cause to be created, a public disturbance, as that term is defined in the Connecticut General Statutes;
Commit disorderly conduct, as that term Is defined in the Connecticut General Statutes.
Obstruct free passage, as that offense is defined in the Connecticut General Statutes.
Engage in activities which would warrant a reasonable officer to believe that the purpose of the behavior is to
engage in a violation of the Connecticut General Statutes regulating dependency-producing drugs.
Engage in activities which would warrant a reasonable officer to believe that such person is engaging in
prostitution, patronizing a prostitute, promoting prostitution, or enticing a minor, as those terms are defined in
the Connecticut General Statutes.
§ 192-3 Law enforcement action; penalties for offenses.
Whenever any police officer in the exercise of reasonable judgment decides that the presence of any person in any
olace is causing, or is likely to cause, any of the prohibited acts enumerated in § 192-2, he or she may, if deemed
recessary for the preservation of the public peace and safety, order that person(s) to leave that place. Officers shall
nform such persons that they will be issued an infraction if they fail to obey the order promptly or engage in further
oitering. Any person who shall refuse to leave after being ordered to do so by a police officer shall be guilty of this
chapter and shall be subject to a fine not exceeding $90.
§ 192-4 Panhandling control.
A.
Generally. The purpose of this section is to regulate behavior to preserve the public order, to protect the citizens
of Middletown and to ensure the safe and uninterrupted passage of both pedestrian and vehicular traffic, without
unconstitutionally impinging upon protected speech, expression or conduct.
Definitions. For the purpose of this section, the following terms shail have the meanings indicated:
AGGRESSIVE MANNER
(1) Approaching, speaking to, or following a person in a manner as would cause a reasonable person to fear
bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon the person, or upon property in the person’s
immediate possession; or
(2) Touching another person without that person’s consent in the course of asking for alms; or

G
E.
(3)
(4)
(5)
6)
Continuing to ask, beg, or solicit alms from a person after the person has made a negative responsé; or
Following the person solicited before, after or while asking, begging or soliciting alms; or
Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a person or vehicle by any means,
including unreasonably causing a person or driver of a vehicle to take evasive action to avoid physical
contact; or
Directing abusive or profane language toward the person solicited, either while asking, begging or
soliciting alms, or following a refusal by the person solicited.
ASK, BEG or SOLICIT ALMS
Includes the spoken, written, or printed word or such other act conducted for the purpose of obtaining an
immediate donation or money or thing of value.
FALSE OR MISLEADING MANNER
Includes, but is not limited to, the asking, begging, or soliciting of alms, including money and other things of
value, through utilization of any of the following representations:
0)
(2)
@)
(4)
Stating or expressing that the donation is needed to meet a specific need, when the solicitor already
has sufficient funds to meet that need and does not disclose that fact; or
Stating that the solicitor is from out of town and stranded, when that is not true; or
Wearing or displaying an indication of physical disability, when the solicitor does not suffer the
disability indicated; or ;
Use of any makeup or device to simulate deformity,
SOLICITOR
Anyone who asks, begs, or solicits alms, including money and other things of value.
Unlawful acts.
(1) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms, including money and other things of value, in an aggressive manner
in any place open to the general public, including, but not limited to, sidewalks, streets, alleys, driveways,
parking lots, parks, plazas, buildings, doorways and entrances to buitdings, and gasoline service stations and
the grounds enclosing buildings.
@)
(3)
(4)
(5)
No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms, including money and other things of value, in a false or misleading
manner.
No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms in any public transportation vehicle; or within 25 feet of any bus or
train station or stop,
No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms within 25 feet of any automatic teller machine (ATM).
No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms from any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle that is in traffic on
a public street.
Interpretation, No provisions of this section shall be interpreted or construed to prohibit speech, expression or
conduct protected by the laws or Constitution of the United States or the laws or Constitution of the State of
Connecticut.
Penalties, Any person convicted of violating any provision of Subsection C shall be fined $90.

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
PHONE: 860-442-0553
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
www.waterfordctorg
lard
iJ
ie
Pa
=
\
MINUTES me
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING nm
Special Meeting —
Waterford Town Hall~ZOOM only. sad
October 28, 2021
RTM Moderator Thomas Dembek called the October 28, 2021 Special Meeting of the Representative
Town Meeting to order at 7:02 P.M,
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Greg Attanasio, Jennifer Bracciale, Timothy Condon, Thomas J. Dembek, Susan Driscoll,
Steven Elci, Timothy Floravanti, Nick Gauthier, Paul Galdstein, Kathleen Kohl, Valerie Metivier, Richard
Muckle (7:25 P.M.), Theodore Olynciw, Dan Radin, Michael Rocchetti, Danielle Steward-Gelinas, Baird
Weich-Collins,
ABSENT: Michael Bono, April Cairns, Mirtam Furey-Wagner, Daviod Lersch, Valerie Metivier, Liam
O'Leary, Robert Swansen.
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT: First Selectman Robert J Brule; Chair of the Board of Finance Ronald R.
Fedor, Selectman Elizabeth Sabilia.
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT: Selectwoman Jody Nazarchyk, Chair of the Board of Education Craig
Merriman.
ALSO PRESENT: Town Clerk David L. Campo; Town Attorney Rob Avena,
ITEM C CORRESPONDENCE
Received from RTM Member Ted Olynciw. (See Attachment)
CALL ITEM 1 ~ Fire Services Hydraulic Equipment
PRESENTATION: Director of Fire Services Michael Howley
MOTION by Welch-Collins, seconded by Goldstein, to approve a técommendation from the Board of
Finance for an appropriation in the amount of $181,000 from designated Line #20523-57826 (Hydraulic
Equipment),
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
CALL ITEM 2 ~ Acceptance of Seaview Terrace
PRESENTATION: Planning Director Abby Piersall, Public Works Director Gary Schneider
MOTION by Driscoll, seconded by Goldstein, to accept Seaview Terrace as a Town Road, pending final
review of documentation by the Town Attomey.

Discussion ensued.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Attanasio, Bracciale, Condon, Dembek, Driscoll, Elci, Fioravanti, Goldstein, Kohl,
Mativier, Morgan, Radin, Rocchetti, Steward-Gelinas,
VOTING AGAINST: Gauthier, Olynciw, Welch-Collins,
Abstained: Muckle
MOTION PASSED: 14-3-1
CALL ITEM 3: Acceptance of Kathryn Court
PRESENTATION: Planning Director Abby Piersall, Public Works Director Gary Schneider
MOTION by Steward-Gelinas, seconded by Driscoll, to accept Kathryn Court as a Town Road, pending
final review of documentation by the Town Attorney.
Discussion ensued.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Attanasio, Bracciale, Condon, Dembek, Elci, Fioravanti, Goldstein, Metivier, Morgan,
Muckle, Radin, Rocchettl, Steward-Gelinas.
VOTING AGAINST: Driscoll, Gauthier, Kohl, Olynciw, Welch-Collins.
Motion Passed: 13-5
Moderator Tom Dembek called for a moment of silence to recognize the previous First Selectman of
fourteen years, Daniel Steward, who had passed away on October 242021.
MOTION by Muckle, seconded by Rocchetti, to adjourn at 7:49 P.M.
VOTING IN FAVOR: Unanimous
Respectfully Submitted,
David L. Campo, CCTC
Waterford Town Clerk

David Campo
From: Thomas Dembek <wastreasurer152@outlook.com>
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2021 1:44 PM
To: David Campo
Subject: FW: RTM AGENDA ITEMS 2 & 3
From: Ted Olynciw <tedolynciw@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 7:55 PM
To; Tom Dembek <wastreasurer152@outlook.com>
Cc: Gary Schneider <gschneider @waterfordct.org>; Rob Brule <rbrule @waterfordct.org>; Robert Avena
<ravena@sswhgg.com>; Abby Piersall <apiersall@waterfordct.org>
Subject: RTM AGENDA ITEMS 2 & 3
Mr. Thomas Dembek, RTM Moderator
Town of Waterford
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
This email is in response to Mr. Gary J. Schneider, Director of Public Works, letter to you dated
October 25, 2021.
| request that you read my email under "Correspondence" and enter it in the record of the RTM
meeting on October 28, 2021.
| appreciate Mr. Schneider's detailed response to my concerns in my email dated Oct. 20, 2021
which was directed to Abby Piersall, Director of Planning.
It is apparent that the long standing Operating Policies and Standards previously maintained by
the two former Directors of the Public Works Department, both Ed Steward and Ron Cusano are
being ignored or that there are new Operating Policies and Standards in place that | am not aware
of.
There appears to Double Standard being used, developers who followed the Town regulations and
those who do not follow the regulations and their excuses are tolerated by the Town Department(s). It
is very disappointing that the Town has lowered the bar for approving new roads.
None of the roads | build in Town would never had been accepted by Thomas Wagner, previous
Director of Planning, the P & Z Commission or the Department of Public Works if these roads were
not 100% completed before | even would request Town acceptance.
You realize that the the Planning & Zoning Commission has the final say as to when a road is ready
to be accepted and does rely on the input from the Public Works Department who oversees the
construction of the roads. However, the Director of Public Works recommended approval.
1

| have not seen any recommendation or request from the Director of Planning or the P & Z
Commission for the RTM to consider accepting any of these roads. No meeting minutes were
provided to us from that Commission showing any discussion, consideration or approval to accepting
these roads. Without these minutes | cannot tell if this matter was even discussed with the
Commission.
| most definitely feel compassion for the families living on these new streets but to put the burden on
the RTM to accept these roads, without being completely finished, is unacceptable. These developers
certainly have had many, many months to complete their work at it a failure of our Town that the work
has not been completed. The Director of Public Works have stated that the developers posted Bonds
with the Town, an insurance policy, if, in fact the work is not completed. The Town could have put the
developer on legal notice, notified the Bonding Agency, and could have completed this work at no
cost to the tax payers. This could and should taken action months ago and not wait to the 11th hour
to put the burden on the RTM.
In short, two major reasons for voting NO on these 2 agenda items:
1. The long standing Operating Policies and Standards of the P & Z Commission and the Public
Works Department have been DOWNGRADED to the point where now, any road that is not
completed
can be accepted by the Town. A new standard and precedent for other developers. This
new policy to downgrade rather that to upgrade existing policies should be unacceptable to all.
2. There is no record, communication or recommendation by the P & Z Commission that they have
discussed this item at any meeting and have not formally requested approval by the RTM, which is
standard practice when considering any item presented to the RTM.
Ted Olynciw, RTM Rep. 2nd District

“eose'9ze
$$
L3°€0S‘'%8
$
Os'sZz‘6z
$
OOO8S‘P8E
$
TWLOLENS
HL1V3H
3I18Nd
oo'tot‘99z
§
OO'LOT’99Z
$
4OJeU!ps00)
sarasas
ueWNH
TO-OTT-PAM
IVMVduV
06°820'SS
$
9TZ07Z
=
$
PUISIG
YYeIH
1Yys!|aspe7
OOT°O $ 00°620'SS $ PUISIG YESH 1YSa3PI] —- TO-8"T-PIM.
sasuadxg YieaH I14Nd 6T-GIAOD 42410 8'T
79EO7Z
=
OLOL'T
$
asuaa!]
WCW
juawdinby
T8zO7Z
=
v8"6SL'E
$
Ang
3s9g
9860EE
ZS'000‘ST
$
69207%
00°SL6
$
auenbs
|eJjuaD
Ov'v7s’L
=
$
997072
08°468
$
AWIGOW
L8LV/IONLSUIS
88tv
o0'00z‘y
~$
sSz0zz
O0'rTr’S
$
DTI
suonnjos
pT
sesueH
YHeay 2119Nd GT-GIAOD 243 03 puodsad 3ey3 Saiz1/!9e4 JING 0} sjUaWASAAUT JeydeD
00°000‘T
$
00°000'T
$
sayddns
add
=
TO-S°T-PJM
quawidinb3 aaij39}01g |2UOSIad $'T
souejeg
#
29100U]
pled
‘ONOd
=
Payaquinoug
43a5ana
@
o
aq
=
aa
fo)

SvEoL
oooos'y
$
sztozz
oo0s’ys
$
Supesuisug
paeuey
O0'000'THT'T
$
oo'o00'007't
$
qeysy
Jamo
saien
suey
O84
10-7
T"S-PIM
zetozz
~=—
OU'OSZ‘E9T
uoewony
sn
-
$
oo'osZ’e9t
S$
apeuddr
sjaued
jO11U03
uoneys
dung
UeWOD
=
€0-S"S-PIM
Q9~S9TZOONO
HTLZ9'E
S$
SSZOZZ
BL
LVLZT
$
dio3
90431d-IYBM
vezwoePrer
=
S$
ooos9‘zes
S$
apeisdn
uoreys
dung
peoy
YIMION
PIO
=
Z0-S"S-PIM
97S9TZO000
HZL7N'E
S$
SSZO%Z
BLLvL'7ZE
$
dio}
a2sald-1ysM,
vets
try
=
$
oo'os9‘ves
=
$
apeisdy
uoneis
duing
peoy
ssoupT0-S°S-PIM
oo'o00'rz6
=
$
-
$
.
$
oo'o00’P~s
$
TWLOLENS
SLIVdINI
JINONOD4
JAILVDIN
ooo00’o0T
«=
$:
oo'000‘00T
S$.
BBeYOD
SUIAAN
=
ZO-TT'Z-PIM
ooo0o’v~s
§=$
ooo00.r~s
=
$
421231
|!9N,O
2428NJ
TLO-TT'7-PIM
oo'oo000z
S$
oooo0‘00z
SS.
SJURID
SSausng
[BUS
PsoHazeM
=
70-6"
Z-PIM
oooo0oot
=
$
o0'000‘00T
«=
$
squauijsanu]
dnyeys
ssauisng
sjURIZOII|
PlOHaIeM=
—-T.0-6"Z-PIM
{je19uaQ)
adueysissy
2IWOUODg
SsoUIsng
[EUS
GZ
gouejeg
#
SDIOAU|
pled
“ON
Od
pasaquinsuz
iaoana
TZOZ
‘OE
YAGINALdSS
QHNOYHL
TZ0z
‘T
AINE
1YOd3Y
ATHILYVND
SGNNd
INISTY
NVIIIINV

ST'SPG'ELL'T
S$
=
ONIGNVISLNO
WB
yrG'ELZT
$
ALVA
OL
G3AI9IIY
WWLOL
ozs‘v06'y
so
$
SE"LT6‘00T
S
ze'9E6'6zS
$
OO'OsE’SES'S
$
IVIOL
osy’stz’e
=
Srety’sl
$
zs'O9T‘00S
$
OO°00R'9zZ'y
$
IWLOLENS
IUNLINULSVUINI
ZS8TOSZA
O00'V60'S
$
(sdoyde
Aysnsas)
snjqa
TILB0STA
O0'08r
$
687077
-
$
(q2euqUOD
JUleW
sdojde]
AyUNdas)
snide
00°929'499'T
§
ooose’ezg‘T
$
apeisdn
pueqpeosg
apis-umoL
Z0-ZT'S-PIM
@8OPEGTZOL
OOSBOT
$
pytZOZ~Z
oOSTY’9S
$
pucggauysiy
spaloid 43UIO -puegpeolg /T'S
aouejed
#
B210AU}
pled
‘ONOd
=
Padaquinouy
iapana
TZOZ@
‘Of
YAIGWILIS
DHNOYHL
TzZ07
‘TAIN
LYOd3u
ATUALYVND
SANNA
INDSay
NVIAAY

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
PHONE: 860-442-0553
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
www.waterfordct.org
November 11, 2021
Mr. Thomas Dembek, Moderator
Representative Town Meeting
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Dear Moderator Dembek:
At the meeting of the Board of Finance held, Wednesday, November 10, 2021, it was voted to
recommend to the Representative Town Meeting, to transfer $1.8 million from the general operating
fund balance into the Capital Non-Recurring Undesignated Fund Balance in anticipation of future
paving projects and forward onto the RTM for approval.
| respectfully request you place this item on the agenda of the next meeting of the Representative Town
Meeting. Copies of backup justification are attached hereto.
Respectfully submitted,
am WF VY
oualh Kedar
Ronald R. Fedor, Chairman
Board of Finance
20
1202
RRF:mtm
Hd LI AGN
SE

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
PHONE: 860-442-0553
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
wwwwaterfordct.org
November 17, 2021
Mr. Ronald Fedor
Chairman
Board of Finance
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Dear Chairman Fedor,
The Board of Selectmen, at their meeting on Tuesday, October 26, 2021 voted to approve the
following request for an appropriation;
Public Works: To consider and act on a request from Public Works Director, Gary Schneider,
for a FY22 additional appropriation for Road Projects in the amount of $1,893,169 and to
forward to the Board of Finance,
Therefore, I respectfully request that you consider and act on this request. I have attached
pertinent back up material from the designated department.
Sincerely,
Robert rule
Robert Brule
First Selectman
cc: Kimberly Allen, Director of Finance

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
October 21, 2021
Mr. Robert Brule
First Selectman
15 Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Re: FY22 Addiitonal Appropriation Requests for Road Projects
Mr, Brule,
The town’s road network has been neglected over the past several years. There are several roads that
should be addressed for immediate repairs. I am requesting an additional appropriation for the following
road projects:
Butlertown Road ~ estimated cost, $587,968
Niantic River Road —~ estimated cost, $385,045
Oil Mill Road ~ estimated cost, $459,936
Daniels Avenue — estimated cost, $276,205
Lakes Pond Road — estimated cost, $184,015
we wWN om
The total additional appropriation being requested is $1,893,169.00.
Regards,
Gary Schneider
Gary Schneider
Director of Public Works
C: Kim Allen, Director of Finance

996°L85
(sagyoue
sapnpour)
799
x
J1/Sp$
0000
Sujquns
yonu:
you
‘peosjeiny
ooo’s
(pz
ul)
jusWwaned
Jeuonippe
pue
yeaowiai
poy
cOs‘s
TCOT
‘OE
Jaquiazdas
payep
ayewuijsy
Woy
Bot
"SyS
Ve Uh UP
$
fEIOL
wee]
SuUBpI AY JOUNA/jRACWaYy YOY
SWd]{
payejay
Bulved
jo
alewiIsyz
peoy
umOoLaANG

90°S9P'SESS
suid.
og/sulaeg
pue
Surmrepey
saya
1230,
00°88S‘6hS
ABUASUNOD
HT
00°081S
00°9$
as
oO0E
steg
dois
00°0rS
ES
Oc
0$
XT
00°008°TT
sour]
MOTTA
poyoreg
Axody
00°000°9$
00°02
PA
bs
00°00€
suOIdy
SAeg|
OO
OOTOSPS
SUIARY
pue
SONA
12197.
00°000°L$
ooLS
se
0001
FeOD
Yaa],
00°07L'671$
OO'O8$
X
uz
X|
SLS00
X
|
CO'OOT*FI
GuTADG.Z
)
Suaed|
00°
OFT
FOZ
00°085-X
w&
X|
SL60'0
X
|
00°008"F1
@unmepayy(,¢
)
Saar
00°07
SFIS
PAbS
|
00°006'87
ST¥LOL
00°00
9S$
00'r$
paAbs
|
oo
00l'ri
GUT)
p2oy
TMopayng
00°008°88S
00°9$
PAbs
|
00°008rI
(Guraepooypeoy
uMopayng,
Spire
x
oT
POL
Ord
HAD
=n
oaenbs
arenbs
peow
Buse
/SUTINAL
ABMPEOY
TZOT
TZOT/OC/60

svo'see = §
{2101
peu Weed jeI38/y
sdoojy suyeay
{payog) jOsRUOD DyWeL
SUaWBAOIOW] ou WYBIS
{sioysue
sapnpou)
OTST
xX
J/SPS
00°89
JeSNS
Spis
OU!
G7
SuCIPEsaIU]
Z
O00'R
Tanoy yy 00s’
TE
atnoy
fo
uasasuBjUl
ain
zy
000°Z
queweasejdas
adid
payedniioo
pue
sdoy
useg
000°
Ub AE Ut
TZ0Z
‘Og
Joquaydas
peep
sjetunsa
wd1y
sys'ooe
=
$
sway]
palejay
Sutned
Jo
aqeUNISg

Se’SPSOOes
Smdiayg/stAeg
pax
SumurEpey/SUTTAL
[eI],
SECLE
LTS
Adve
SUTIUO7
%OT
00°OFZS
oo
9$
as
00°0F
sieg
dojg
OS
LZETS
o£
0$
cai
oo'Stry
sour]
MOTe,
pajureg
Axodq
00'0$
00°07
PA
bs
suoidy
oabg|
0O'9SHTLZS
BIATY
pure
SUI
[201
00°0$
0OLS
Biz)
OD
WRT
00°9£E°681S
00°08$
X
we
X|S£500
X
|
OC
OTL
EL
(Burmepooy(,.¢
)
suAeg|
ON
OTE
TSS
PASS
|
O0DTL
ET
STVLOL
1 FY JO BNO H61# OF T ALY Mog!
GO'OZET8S
00°9$
PADS
|
OO'OZL‘EL
Gumepoey peoy
Joany
OMUeIN
Ssprex
poy
°
FIO,
atid
WU
7g,
arenbg
areaby
proy
SULAE
Z/SUNIIA,
ABMPBOY
TZ0Z
TZ0Z/0C/60

3€6'6S7
$
[eIOL,
SUIGIND
yon
1OU
‘peos
(Biny
GOO’S
$
WPO]
ST UOnIasIsU] Z 000'% $ SUOHIASIBTU] BAR
T aynoy Jo uompasiayul ey Wy 00ST $ (a2}}0g) jouOD Sure
quswiaoe|da:
adid
paje8nuo02
pue
sdoy
uiseg
Oo00'T
s
saunonss
aseuieiq
(PZ
uw)
quawWaned
jeuoIppe
pue
[RACAL
YOY
OO0’ST
$
Bulvapin,
JOUNA/(PAOWUIBY
xDOY
SWUBWOAOIN LH DUT IYUSIS

OZ9EE
LIDS
Suidiyg
Siar
pue
supnpepey
Sania
e101
OT
PEGLES
‘ApUSSHTINOD
%OT
oo00E$
00°9$
AS
00°0S
sieg
dojg
00°090°E$
oC
o$
aT
00°00Z°OT
soury
Moyer
porureg
Axodg|
0000S
TS
00°0z$
PA
bg
00°SL
suoidy
sazq|
0°780°SLES
__
SUIARY
Pus
SUTTIAL
FEI0.L
00
0004S
00°L$
syep
0001
JBOD
Hoe]
smo,
SIZE~
ee
POS
STIS
00°08$
X
«ZX
$£50°0
X
|
00079"
ET
@uUAN.2
)
smaeg
O0'SETTEIS
0008S X
ul
X]
S£50'0X
|
00°CTS'S
(SURATEPORD (aE
)
SULAEG,
00°OPS
TITS
PA
bS
|
OO'OET
EC
STVLOL
oo
Osr
FSS
GO
r$
pAbs
|
oooz9o'et
(SITHAD
Peo
TNA
TO)
00°090°LS$
00°9$
pAbs
|
00°019'6
(BuaEOI)peow WGA
TIO
spley
ag
T2301,
aoLtd
Wag,
pug,
axenbg
axenbg
peoy
Sula
g/AunTAl
Aesapeoy
1207
TZOT/OC/60

{sroysue
sapnjoul}
925
XH/SPr$
000°9%
$
Hey
weg
jeI3W)
yoans
apis
OJ!
SZ
suaIIasIaIU|
y
OOO
$
SUOIIBSIBUY
BAB
peayids
jo
uoRjesiequ
ay
TY
O0S'T
5
{eoyog}
jonuOD
SugeAL
juawaseidas
edid
pareSn.uo02
pue
sdo]
mseg
0007
§
saimoniys
adeurig
(,vZ
ulus}
JuaUIsAed
[euOMIppe
pue
yeACWDI
yoy
-
S
Suuspiyy
JOUI\y/jeaowsay
yoy
[eAourad
38.)
‘Aujpess
uonesoj
T
ooo’z
$
SqUaWaAoIdUy
Sull
JUSS
SBUEMO]pY
TZOZ
‘DE
sequiaides
payep
ayeuiysg
WiOly
SOL’8Ez
$
SWo]]
palejey
Suineg
Jo
a]
2UINRSZ
tzez/etfor
fe
ahueay
saueq}

Or
POL
‘SETS
SmdLog/smARy
pur
Smmnteppeay/SUA
(2407,
Or
00
Tz$
AIUSSUTIUOD
%OT
og
0c$
00°9$
as
00'0s
sieg
dois
00°080'°TS
oc
os
XT
00°009°E
SOUL]
moyjoA
pojureg
Axodgy
00°0$
60°0z$
PA
bs
suoidy
oarg
OO'PZO'STZS
SUIACg
pay
SUA
(630.1,
00°00S‘E$
OO'LS
se
00s
JeOD
yor]
OO°IS*SES
00°08$
¥
uzX]
SLSo'O
X
|
CO'O9RE
GuTGz)
StiABd
OOZES
TIS
OO
ORS
Xue
X|
SLSC'O
X
|_O0'OrT'S
Gupmmeppoay(,¢
)
Suraed|
00°087'F9S
pz
bs
|
00°000°ZI
STVLOL
00
OFF
STS
00
rs
pabs
|
oo9g's
(OTHAD
aay
sforaed
00°
0r8'Sr$
00°9$
PADS
|
00'0PT'S
GuMMepeyjoay
spore
spray
Poa
Te30.L
eH
HAD,
wef
axenbs
arenbs
PEoy
SUIAtg
/SUNTYA
ABMPEOY
[ZT
TZOZ/OE/60

STO'V8T
{sioysue
sopnaui}
sie
x
J1/S%$
00°07
$8 24 Jo uONpasIayu! aL IY OOS‘Z
quawaoedel adid poyeSnit02 pue sdos uiseg Oco’z
(vz
uw}
yuswaned
jeuciippe
pue
jeaows2
y0y
O00'OT
1207 ‘DE Joquajdes pazep a]ewRSy WoLy STS"OST
Bed
Uh US Uh te ty UY
$
PO)
weoy
(200g) fOQUOD Ayer
Sainjonys a8eureg
SULUSPLAA JOUNAL//PAOWaY YOY
Squswendsduyy auly Wyss
SseaueMmoyyy
sway] payejay Sutazg Jo ay2uINS3
TZ0z
‘ZT
4aqowoof
peoy
puog
Saxeq]

SOPIS
OCIS
Surdryg/suyaeg
pue
sararepsy/SUT Al
12207,
SrOlr
TIS
ADUISMID
%OT
00°08
TS
0090S
as
000E
smeg
doj¢
0s0s8$
ef
0s
a1
00°SE8°T
SOU]
MOTIOA
poyteg
Axody
00°00S
TS
00°07$
pa
bs
OO'SL
suoidy
sated
OOPLSITIS
SULA
pur
SUNITA
1201.
o0"00S"€$
00°LS
Biz)
00s
TeO7
Hoel
p0°00T
6S
00°03$
XTX]
SLS00
KX!
O0'OST
@GuVyGz
)
same]
O0P6T
EFS
00°08$
Xué
X|
SLS00X
|
OO'OEl’e
(BororepayyG,¢
)
SARA
00°08L'°SE$
PAS
|
OO'OSEL
STVLOL
00°000°L1$
00'S
PADS
|
00'OSTP
Ga)
puog
soye'y;
O0'OSL
STS
a0°9$
PADS
|
OO'OET’S
(GurTEpoy)
PeOY
puog
sayey]|
spiex
por
POL
ed
HAL
mn
axenbs
aaenbs
peor
SuraL dg
/sanyAl
AVMpLoy
TZ0Z
TZOZ/0E/60


2-3
BACKUP TO BE PROVIDED SEPERATELY BY HUMAN RESOURCES

Personne] Review Board
Charter 4.5
Ordinance 2,44.020
Address
Appointed - 3 - Years - Representative Town Meeting
Maidelis, Talivaidis
Murphy, Edward K.
Patterson, Cathy
Peabody, David
Wells, Rikki W.
AVGAA
Chair: Rikki W. Wells
Secretary: Frances Ghersi
38 Beacon Hill Road
23 Doyle Road
7 Leary Orive
14R Spithead Road
413 Quarry Road
Term
12H118 - 14/30/21
12/4/19 - 11/30/22
12/4/20 ~ 11/30/23
42/1420 - 11/30/23
42/1/19 ~ 41/30/22
Page 14
Email
talim605@gmail.com
edmurphyt 14@gmail.com
claropatierson@gmait.com
david.peabody@ymail.com
Rikki8243@gmail.com
Phone
(203) 687-6305
(860) 442-6702 (860) 367-1887 cell
(860) 443.1484 (860) 334-2273
(860) 287-1842
(860) 442-5532 (860) 235-7625 cell

Ethics Commission
Charter, 5,18.4
Ordinance 2.60
RTM Appointed
Burnham, Mark
Bush, Olga
Garvin, Steven
Wolfley, Laurie
Zeldis, Martin
VUoAAA
Alternates:
R Hersom, Cindy
Db Ritter, Elizabeth 8, (Betsy)
Chair: Martin Zeidis
Recording Secretary: Vacancy
Address
1 Glenwood Road
54 Rope Ferry Road D63
2 Raymond Lane
15 Anita Avenue
2 Goundry Orive
86 Shore Road
24 Old Mill Road, QH
Term
2/3/20 - 217122
23/20 ~ 2/7/22
2/1/21 ~ 216/23
213/20 - 2/7/22
2Hl21 - 218/23
213/20 ~ 217/22,
2/1/21 ~ 216/23
rey. 10/44/21
Page 7
Emaii
mark.burnham@att.net
olgambush@sbegiobal.net
steven.d.garvin@gmail.com
laurie. wolley@uconn.edu
Ztr8n@aol.com
cindy@dicinelectric.com
batsyritter24@gmail.com
Phone
(860) 444-0174 h (860) 389-8239 c
(860) 442-0113 h
(860) 449-4606 ¢ (860) 443-4483 h
(860) 443-7743 h (860) 908-7550 c
(860) 442-4580 h (860) 680-4580 c
(860) 460-3679 c (860) 444-8187 h
(860) 444-1700 h (860) 514-2003

/-11
Representative Town Meeting Standing Committees 2021 - 2023
At least three members and each RTM member shall be assigned to at least one standing committee.
Education
Committee on Committees at least 5
(1) Majority Leader
(2) Minority Leader
(3)
(4)
(5)
Must include all four Districts
as well as the Majority and Minority leaders
Legislation and Administration
Public Works, Planning & Development
Finance, Wage & Personnel
Public Health,Recreation & Environment
Public Protection & Safety
Other Appointments:
Social Service Grants Review (1 year)
Retirement Commission (2 years)
Information Technology Committee (lyr.)
Long Range Fiscal Planning Comm. (5 total)
School Building Committee (3 total)
Rev, 12/2021
*Chair

FIFTEEN ROPE FERRY ROAD
WATERFORD, CT 06385-2886
PHONE: 860-442-0553
www.waterfordct.org
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING
2022 REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULE
7:00pm — Waterford Town Hall Auditorium
February 7, 2022
April 4, 2022
May 2, 3, 4 and 5, 2022 (FY23 Annual Budget M