Representative Town Meeting (RTM) Regular Meeting (linked)

agenda center agenda

Board/CommissionRepresentative Town Meeting (RTM)
Meeting DateOctober 06, 2025
Pages2
File Size0.3 MB
OCR Status Searchable (OCR processed)
Source URLOriginal
Download PDF

Document Preview

Full Text (OCR Extracted)
October 6, 2025 yj) SS
To: Moderator, Waterford RTM . #) RY
Subject: Correspondence Regarding Proposed Funding for Oswegatchie Fire Station
Dear Moderator, 
Te Fs
=, OO
5: . ao 7D
lam writing to share my concerns regarding the resolution before the RTM to actiupon the
recommendation of the Board of Finance that an appropriation not to exceed $12.6 million
be approved for the construction of a new Oswegatchie fire station. | want to begin by
stating clearly that | fully support the need for an improved and modern fire station. Our
firefighters and emergency personnel deserve a safe, functional, and comfortable facility
that allows them to perform their critical duties effectively. However, | have significant
concerns about the process and the cost associated with the proposal currently before us.
The projected cost of $12.6 million appears unusually high, particularly given that we have
not been presented with any alternative options or less expensive designs for comparison. |
am especially troubled by the fact that the same company responsible for this cost
estimate is also managing a new fire station project in Bristol, CT, a station thatis
approximately 2,000 square feet larger than ours and is reportedly costing $6.5 million.
That is roughly half of what we are being told our station will cost. | believe itis fairand
necessary to ask why there is such a large discrepancy between the two projects.
In addition, we were provided with an estimate suggesting that renovating the existing
Oswegatchie station to a “like-new” condition would cost approximately $8 million. While
that figure is still substantial, it represents a savings of about $4 million compared to the
proposed new construction. | do not understand why this option was not seriously
evaluated or presented to the RTM as a viable alternative. Even if the conclusion was
ultimately that a new building was the best path forward, | believe it is our responsibility as
representatives to explore and understand all potential options before committing to a
project of this magnitude.
This issue is not just about the fire station itself; it’s about the process, transparency, and
fiscal responsibility. We have a duty to both our first responders and the taxpayers of
Waterford. Providing a safe, efficient, and modern facility for our firefignters should not
preclude us from also ensuring that we are making a financially prudent decision. It is my
belief that we owe the public a more thorough and comparative evaluation of costs and
alternatives before proceeding.
| want this correspondence to reflect that | have reservations about how we arrived at this
point and that! do not feel all options were adequately explored. While | remain supportive

of providing our firefighters with the resources and facilities they need, | believe we should
also be holding ourselves to the highest standard of due diligence and fiscalaccountability.
Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to share these concerns and to have them
entered into the record,
Respectfully,
Erica Casper
Representative, Waterford RTM District 1