Conservation Commission Regular Meeting Materials (linked)
agenda center agenda
| Board/Commission | Conservation Commission |
|---|---|
| Meeting Date | May 27, 2021 |
| Pages | 2 |
| File Size | 11.5 MB |
| OCR Status | Searchable (OCR processed) |
| Source URL | Original |
Document Preview
Full Text (OCR Extracted)
GENERAL NOTES: 8 bay
LEGEND j Ny \
1) Reference is made to the following plans: TEST H OLE D ATA
These standard symbols may A) ”As-Built Plan, Property Belonging To Wendi L. Pettit, 16 Dimmock Road, Waterford, Connecticut, Scale: 1"=40', March 5, 18 DIMMOCK ROAD, WATERFORD CT
be found in the drawing. 2001." Plan surveyed and mapped by William F. Kent, RLS. Plan filed in Florek Surveying, LLC Records as Map *'302.. DATE DECEMBE ,
%* Light Pole B) "Compilation Plan - File No. E8112, Map Showing Easement Area To Be Granted To The Connecticut Light And Power ~ MBER 10, 2020
CONG. ¢ _ ous Company DBA Eversource Energy Across The Property Of Kelly Wegg Joseph, 20R Dimmock Road, Town Of Waterford - TIME — 10:00AM TO 11:30AM
BIT. Bituminous County Of New London - Connecticut, Sheet 1 of 1, Scale: 1" = 20', Dated: October 23, 2018." Plan surveyed and mapped TEMPERATURE — 45 DEGREES
9S Utility Pole by James Bernardo Land Surveying. Plan filed on the Waterford Land Records as map 6497.
oy ater vane C) "New Lot D (Harris Property) Dimmock Road, Waterford, Connecticut, Date: 10-08-04, Scale: As-Shown."” Plan surveyed and CONDITIONS — SUNNY AND CLEAR
x xX Chain Link Fence mapped by R.P. Dimmock Associates. Plan filed on the Waterford Land Records as map 4977. ENGINEER — DAVID L. COOLEY, P.E., DLC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC SITE yd
== Boundary Line HEALTH DEPARTMENT — DANIELLE HOLMES, REHS/RS, LEDGE LIGHT HEALTH DISTRICT § 30. wey | x)
Edge of Road / Drive 2) Not all underground utilities have been shown. Call before you dig (CBYD) is recommended prior to any construction. 3 \\ ae 7
sae = Stone Mall TEST HOLE 1 - THI me) A
CB Catch Basin ; 5 3 ; ; — ; ; “eT 3
SMH Sewer Manhole 3) North orientation is based on two independent RTK GNSS observations utilizing the Superior Network in February 2020. 6.= 9" TOPSOIL/FILL MATERIAL GREAT A”
LP.S. 5/8” Iron Pin Set 9” — 16” TOPSOIL /
RR SPIKE ae eee = Found 4) The word certify as used is understood to be an expression of professional opinion by the surveyor. It is a declaratory statement which is 16” — 26” LIGHT ORANGE BROWN MEDIUM SANDY LOAM
eR ‘Pall ole Sek. based on the surveyor's best knowledge, information and belief. As such it constitutes neither a guarantee nor warranty, expressed or implied, 26” — 38” LIGHT YELLOW BROWN COARSE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL ®. &
WLF 2 Wetland Flag of any information contained hereon. 38” — 60” STANDING GROUNDWATER My
GMS__ Granite Merestone Pro XS ,
ae ose
EX. CONC. ite ome es crete Monument 5) Removal or destruction of survey monumentation, whether set or found, as shown on this survey plan may be subject to Connecticut Statute STANDING GROUNDWATER AT 38” - Grade ‘ 1700! .
Tree tine 47-3Aa. TOTAL TEST HOLE DEPTH — 60” — NO LEDGE Proposed Clean out i Location Map
CHD CT Highway Department Monument REDOX/GW MOTTLING — 29” ° SerQR SS grees ‘ 4 Proposed Silt Fence (TYP.) Graphic Scale 1" = 1000'
------- Existing Contour Li ji " ‘ ‘ ;
xisting Contour Line 6) Wetlands flagged by James Cowen, CPSS and field located by Florek Surveying, LLC thereafter. ROOTS DOWN TO 37 —— -_ Existing Septic Tank (approx.) , \ gw e 0 1000 200
a os TM, - ‘i ~ 16, a
7) Engineering services completed by David Cooley, P.E., DLC Engineering Services, LLC. O ae *s~,_ Existing Septic Line ‘, BS sy . "PVC Schedule 40 ASTM D1785 ac ‘A ———
Bearing Chart: ae a Binet 1,250 Two-Compartment ii see eh cation @foundatin ff ee +4 / |
8) Subsurface sewage investigation areas sized based on projected Maximum Leaching System Spread calculations. Final leaching system aa Seema eptic Tank - Inlet invert 15.52°(TYP.) ae ee i a /
DINE... SEARING _, DISTANCE spread will be determined based on percolation test results. ae Es ce Sted A ASTM sor wert Pan mY ft | fo Nf eee — a a, |
“5 . ee . soe ee a _below slab foundation with clean out Found @ F 4 Stone Driveway f ete -_-— TT —---—- 7 H |
L3 N 772743" E 26.29" 9) Property served by Public Water System - Waterford WPCA os iesrest (oe Proposed Garage oT oe ee eee i ae * !
L4 N 79°0801" E 18.72" Proposed Distribution e oe e ootprint (24'x24) aw \ eye fe ee i all _—_—-—_— 7] 7 tty 20" Maple | ja
ez4?aR” 7 xis) i salt i am ’
= ~ oe = 22.0; 10) Property is located in Flood X as shown on Firm Map, New London County, Connecticut (All Jurisdicitions) Panel 511 of 554, Community Bon) eee (To Be prairie a i —_— Th 834409" E/ 183. 79 f) : eal
L7 N 71°38'52” E£ 9.62" Town of Waterford, Number 090107, Panel 0511, Suffix J; Map Revised: August 5, 2013. Test Hole 2 (TH2) - Eee ~ ae —_—_ aa — if] /
L8 N 79°44°47" E 7.07" poacinl ——= $a ————_———“i—s—SM HL eee y
Lg N 74°49°57" E 4.82’ Test 1 (PT1) eo \9 ; _-—-— | |
: Proposed Leaching Area #2 - 55 LF GST 6212 A a eg eee 8 ge Gravel Driveway / _ | |
- Base Elevation 13.83 (TYP) Ue 6 1" Iron Pipe ; fee ee ee fe errr Fee N's Q |
‘ — OC, Found y, i }/ |
Zoning Compliance Chart NOW OR F ORMERLY Percolation ‘ \ ; / ale des : ¢ ' /
Zone: R-40 Accessory Dwelling Joseph Kelly Wegg Test 2 (PT2) \ " ; \ satjaing tine e i v /
20 R Dimmock Road Silt Fence (TYP.) - Limits of Disturbance ine \ \ ‘VF: — / dS : 8 /
Required: Provided: P 2-01 76. asthe 2 (13) rit Hore extn Ts SORT NN Q age gORY / Shs |} ;
Minimum Lot Area: 40,000 s.f. | 52,469 s.f. arcel ID 152 - 0173410 Femail ae \ \} cee ; We Pi me |
é \ EXISTING o i
Minimum Lot Frontage: 100 ft. 118.00 ft. Town Clerk. Volume 1560 Page 150 an a Cae pass ree ‘y \ \ &, / H /
Minimum Lot Width: 100 ft. 100 es: fe eee One OS ce tf me: ee ee ee : aa le a ‘ % ri /
Minimum Front Yard Setback: 50 ft. 152 ft. Sa i / ae /
Minimum Side Yard Setback 25 ft. 15.0 ft*. Ce] dge OfLawn XO ‘ : oo ean Sire ke hg
Minimum Rear Yard Setback: 50 ft. 313 ft. ‘“e a : fA \ rde\skp os “i]s 9 oh
Maximum Building Coverage: 25% 4.1% =r, Oe a ae alls oe = at Wetiens Busier t = XN wot 2 iS 1S) vl \
. opps ° “ = 6. > = ‘ 7 } Srain'! v wy By, >
Maximum Building Height: 35 ft. 20 ft. _- saat sees 17 B = s \ , i ie pan) Gl : ~ di o
_ ~. Ce, es ° fo)
* Variance requested for Accessory Dwelling Structure _—- — Ig L. oof es _— / / o / x el
en ive eine ty Nay Weir gS ricgee eS : re | _ — : H wl
= Existing Lawn ti = “ss a "s ae oe eee bee i oe tiles 5 AY i
— AQ! DrilHole RAN ASERETION Ts 8" Henvock woe fF OSA ON ~~ \ Pe tea
Drill Hole 16.98 Found \ oe ; Mess. 75 ee | Ny ae oat a / Ny
Found ’ \ were <)30" Maple = eee WLF 8 eens / / g
: os “sg WLF 5
/ % gfiitenmnseang socal WLF 12 i WLF 10 A | wie 4 _ Granite 15" Maple
; Ne WLF 15 phe te : “a ye WLF 9 WL = :
. 3 ~~ in Eg Sec. 57) me oS e é \WLF3 ae ‘I j
/ Subject Property: 18 Dimmock Road J cmaieees J 2° OF tay, ie a 7 a pe- ‘i i arr)
. Osed Spo Bee ry O > ' Bite .
NOW OR FORMERLY : Assgso0 eb! ! ze ie 2010 Grade - 15.83" _ ; ns { Invgrt= 11.96 WLF 2 aa / bs
Richard J. ¢» Wendi L. Pett, Trustee [% pol i fo ; ‘ i On: -- s / /
Parcel ID 152 - 0176302 ke ; Asie _ — - ; —_ esa oe _ / ibe _— \ os / ;
Town Clerk Volume 1547 Page 261 a) oe ce. ae cael _ ae fee iit N /
eS —_— gt’ i Invert= 10.16 ——e i Per — way ar Y Proposed Spot _— .
iS 57°08" W 510.0! | QT joe gravel Drive da Y Grade - 16.86" Existing Leaching Trenches
> S 8 ate ocean, ene et ty 42 Proposed Spot (crushed stone) (approx.)
a a ae mal 4 Grade - 14.68'
ose og ee ES \ ee ene 7 Test Hole 1 (TH1)
/ _ eee ta eS eee J 7 Proposed Leaching Area #1 - 25 LF GST
| rd ee re | Oe cael ee le [aie <n A lil / 6212 - Base Elevation 12.68' (TYP.)
_—_ oo 7 4% FR rn
/ ee ee ¥ Bq, y PERCOLATION TEST 2 — PT2
con ae N
| rn GEA eae a eo ce Invert= 9.19 eg by DEPTH — 15”
: coon | a EO le - .00"
OS en NOW OR FORMERLY Invert= 10.03 PRE-SOAK — 11:50PM
72 ~ eee ee ee Richard J. C» Wendi L. Petut, Trustee Pond
Bituminous Concrete a eer el — 16 Dimmock Road HE WATER LEVEL (IN.) WATER LEVEL DROP (IN.) RATE MIN. /IN.
_ Driveway aL _— 1:05PM 4.00
~~ au Parcel ID 152 - 0176302
ST a PERCOLATION TEST DATA nao OE ~~ 44
Town Clerk Volume 1547 Page 261 1:15PM 6.25 1.125 44
milled amy dy loam, 0 to 3 1 18 DIMMOCK ROAD, WATERFORD, CT 1: 20PM 7125 0.875 5.7
alpole sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Proposed 4” PVC ASTM D 3034 1: 25PM 8.00 0.875 5
The Walpole Series consists of very deep, poorly drained sandy soils formed in outwash and stratified drift. They are SDR 35 Effluent Distribution Piping DATE — DECEMBER 10, 2020 4:30PM 8.75 0.75 =p
nearly level to gently sloping soils in low-lying positions on terraces and plains. Slope ranges from 0 to 8 percent TIME — 12:00AM TO 2: 30PM : aay i 0.75 6.7
Non-wetland Soils: TEMPERATURE — 45 DEGREES 1:45PM 10.625 050. 10.0
The non-wetland soils consist primarily of: CONDITIONS — SUN NY AND CLEAR r seal - 0.625 8.0
51B Sutton fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes very stony > ’ 0.50 10.0
73C Charlton-Chatfield complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes very rocky _ poly . . 0.375 13.3
_ : : 0.375 15.5
PERCOLATION TEST 1 — PTI el bom pul ibs
DEPTH — 14.5” 2:15PM 13.25 0.375 13.3
2: 20PM EMPTY
SURVEY NOTES:
1. This survey has been prepared pursuant to the regulatio.
20-300b-20 and the "Standards for surveys and maps in
of Land Surveyors,
SURVEY based on a Re-Survey as shown as map reference
2. This survey conforms to Class A-2 /T-2
To the best of my knowledge and belief this map is
ns of the Connecticut State Agencies, Sections 20-300b-1 through
the State of Connecticut" as adopted by the Connecticut Association
Inc. on September 26, 1996; Amended October 26, 2018. This survey type is an ZONING COMPLIANCE
1A-1C. It is intended to show PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.
s-7-2])
Kets
Sul 6ciGV nt
substantially correct as noted thereon. ==> a pec i =e " ipa as eal aii
WU ry, yl "Ny,
Lie . we CONN, woe CONNER, W
4 Ye £5. 5 | o| 2! Sx ol ORK tL CL. =f ke frase Sx rae BGM A TE RF OR D J CON N E C Tl CU T Town of Waterford, CT
jan = Se % ay ca AS yt — poe en PAS ‘ae i) < SCALE: 1" = 20'
Brian D. Florek,L.S. #70135 Date ithout Sai ange KE eit Cooley, PB’ #2%892 Date ithou Z xl =agge * E Graphic Scale REVISIONS: MARCH 13
Managing Member, Florek Surveying, LLC Embossed Seal zy No.70198 4 5 anaging Member, DLC Engineering Services, LLC Embossed Seal cook gam Jee 1" = 20' ,
239 Shore Road, Waterford, CT 06385 “1 kgf SlCensern SS 259 Noank Ledyard Road, Mystic, CT 06355 a S Ne ‘CENSE & > 20 0) 10 20 40° 80 MAY 28, 2020
bflorek@floreksurveyinglic.com “ah ris’ dicengineeringservicesllc@gmail.com " TON s PLAN REVISED THROUGH: MAY 5, 2021 Sh eet | of 2
TEST HOLE 2 — TH2
0 - 10” TOPSOIL
10” — 37” YELLOW BROWN SANDY LOAM, SOME SILT
37° — 60 GREY FINE SAND
STANDING GROUNDWATER AT 45”
TOTAL TEST HOLE DEPTH — 60” — NO LEDGE
REDOX/GW MOTTLING — 29”
ROOTS DOWN TO 45”
TEST HOLE 3 — THS
0 - 10” | TOPSOIL
10” — 30” ORANGE BROWN FINE SILTY LOAM
30° - 97 GREY COARSE SAND
STANDING GROUNDWATER AT 37”
TOTAL TEST HOLE DEPTH — 57” — LEDGE/LARGE ROCK
REDOX/GW MOTILING — 26”
ROOTS DOWN TO 37”
PRE-SOAK — 11:55AM
TIME WATER LEVEL (IN.) WATER LEVEL DROP (IN.) RATE MIN./IN.
1:07PM 5.125
10M 2128 400 13 SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY
1:22PM EMPTY ) ) LAND BELONGING TO:
ROBERT, JR. & GRACE KYNE
18 DIMMOCK ROAD
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 2021
Planning & Development
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM NOTES SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN CALCULATIONS LEACHING AREA #1 CROSS SECTION DETAIL SEPTIC ELEVATIONS SCHEDULE
CROSS SECTI ON’ A-K’ 8 OUTLET DISTRIBUTION BOX
1. THERE ARE NO WELLS WITHIN 75 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. BASIS OF DESIGN: - ‘cca , DETAIL
2. THERE ARE NO FOOTING DRAINS WITHIN 25 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. ‘ 8 PROPOSED GRADE % SEPTIC TANK
NOT TO SCALE
3. A CONDITION OF THIS DESIGN IS THAT THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SHALL BE STAKED RESIDENTIAL HOME — 4 BEDROOMS 15° _ = 15 ;
Se Ue a ee NO GARBAGE GRINDER AND NO LARGE TUBS OF 100-200 GALLONS 12° MIN mal a REET EE Ibis
4. THE LICENSED INSTALLER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING THE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE. DISPOSAL Te = : 14 ;
SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. IN ADDITION, PER PUBLIC HEALTH CODE ASSUME 150 GALLONS PER BEDROOM PER DAY, 75 GALLONS PER BEDROOM BEYOND THREE, AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a NATIVE FILL \ OUTLET INVERT 15.27
REQUIREMENTS THE LICENSED INSTALLER SHALL BE ON-SITE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SYSTEM. DESIGN FLOW = 3 BEDROOMS X 150 GPD + 1 BEDROOM X 75 GPD = 525 GALLONS PER DAY 13° i T + ee ay 13’ ’
" . DESIGN PERCOLATION RATE = 10.1 TO 20.0 MINUTES PER INCH 12° — 12° : .
6. THE LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT/DISTRICT MUST BE NOTIFIED BEFORE ANY PORTION OF THE eee BOTTOM OF TANK 10.94 11/2
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS CONSTRUCTED AND PRIOR TO BACKFILL OF ANY PORTIONS. DESIGN UTILIZES A 25 FT SEPARATION DISTANCE TO A OPEN WATERCOURSE/WETLAND PER TABLE 1 OF THE CTDPH TECHNICAL 11 11” GRADE ON TOP OF TANK ; x
7. THE UNSTALLER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND. ADEQUATELY COMPACT ANY FILL THAT |S REQUIRED STANDARDS — ITEM C. THE 18 DIMMOCK ROAD LOT WAS IN EXSISTENCE PROR TO 8/16/1982 AND IS NOT LOCAT::D ON A ‘a an 16.86 a ee a
BE PLACED IN 6 TO 8 INCH LIFTS AND SHALL BE MECHANICALLY COMPACTED. PUBLIC) MATER: SUPREY BSTERSHED, . DISTRIBUTION BOX Ld
8 THERE SHALL BE NO CUTS WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE . r tl
DISPOSAL SYSTEM OR WITHIN 25 FEET OF THE SIDES OF THE SYSTEM. THERE SHALL BE NO STUMPS OR DESIGN COMPONENTS: INLET INVERT 15.03’ eee prs hi
BOULDERS BURIED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE SYSTEM. 8 = 8 14.93" 1-4 | openmc a
9. SHOULD ANY SIGNIFICANT VARIATIONS FROM TEST PIT DATA SHOWN (LEDGE, GROUNDWATER, 1,250 GALLON TWO COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANK > “aa, LEACHING UNIT OUTLET INVERT 4. ya" OF bt
i = a ti sa ie — dl
10. IN GENERAL, ALL CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, AS PER THE PUBLIC HEALTH CODE, SHALL BE ADHERED TO. ERREGTIVE LEACHING AREA, RESUIRED = 267.5 Sr \FER "TABLE 6 (OF “THE: CIDFH sTEGISGA.. STANDARDS
INLET INVERT 13.68’ of ‘ iossaich a. "
THE FOLLOWING OUTLINES SOME OF THE MAJOR PROCEDURES, BUT DO NOT RELIEVE THE INSTALLER 62"x12” GEOMATRIX GST 6212 LEACHING SYSTEM, ELA=10.0 SF/LF NOT TO SCALE .. ; 11/2"
FROM FULL COMPLIANCE DUE TO THEIR LACK OF MENTION BELOW: 12 FOOT MINIMUM ROW SPACING (ON CENTER) a TOP ELEVATION 13.68" {2 TOP VIEW .
LENGTH OF LEACHING SYSTEM PROVIDED = 80 LF = LEACHING AREA #2 ~
RAIN STORM OR IF THERE IS STANDING WATER IN THE AREA. - 11/2" + an? bey 1/2" D-BOX DESIGN SPECIFICATION
b. THE EARTH SHALL BE SCARIFIED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT. GRAVEL FILL SHALL MEET PUBLIC Vo ee i nS LEACHING AREA #2 CROSS SECTION DETAIL INLET INVERT 14.83’ / id f CONFORMS TO LATEST:
HEALTH CODE SPECIFICATIONS AND BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NOTE. 7. , : ASTM DESIGNATION C913
c. NO TRUCKS OR HEAVY MACHINERY SHALL BE ALLOWED IN THE STRIPPED AREA. DEPTH TO RESTRICTIVE LAYER = 29 INCHES - GROUNDWATER MOTTLING/REDOX CROSS SECTION B-B TOP ELEVATION 14.83’ NOTES:
11. THIS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED TO ACCEPT BACKWASH FROM A MLSS = HF X FFX PF = 34 X 1.75 X 1.25 = 74.4 LF 17 ie 17" ; 1. PIPE INLET AND OUTLET LOCATIONS
WATER SOFTENER. 80 LF OF LEACHING SYSTEM PROVIDED — SLIGHTLY CONVERGING ; PROPOSED GRADE fd 5’ BASE ELEVATION 13.83 13 1/4" | wer HAVE POLYLOK PIPE SEALS.
12, ALL GEOMATRIX GST 6212 INSTALLATIONS UTILIZE A SPECIFIED SAND (SEE DESIGN NOTE ON SPECIFIED 75 LF OF LEACHING SYSTEM SPREAD PROVIDED 25 FT DOWNGRADIENT — MLSS ACHIEVED 16 - : 16 OPENING 2. CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE
INGH MINIMUM ON THE SDES THE DEPIM OF SPEGIFED SAND UNDERNCATIN THE LEACHING SYSTEM. s-== SS psig sal ay TV 5. METHON OF MANUFACTURE: WE
iN ees 1 . METHOD OF MANUFACTURE: Wi
SHALL BE INCREASED BASED ON EXISTING GRADES WITH TOPSOIL REMOVED TO MAINTAIN A LEVEL LEACHING AREA #1 BASE ELEVATION (UPGRADIENT SIDE) - 12.68 FT ; 11.047) NATE: PRS ; } woe CAST.
BASE ELEVATION FOR EACH LEACHING AREA. LEACHING AREA #2 BASE ELEVATION (UPGRADIENT SIDE) — 13.83 FT 14 t —— SNSTING GRADE | 4 12" SIDE VIEW 1 4, SECTION IS MONOLITHIC,
13. THE SPACE BETWEEN THE GEOMATRIX GST 6212 SECTIONS CREATED AT ANGLED BENDS SHALL BE . 1 1/2
14, lie nt it Pepe oe eg cD ey pat on tee eae ae OF THE CTDPH TECHNICAL STANDARDS MEETING THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND GRADATION: 2 ————— 12° 1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK DETAILS SET be etc i
: INSTALL WATERTIGHT PLUGS ON ALL UNUSED
PERFORATED DISTRIBUTION PIPE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A SOLID CAP.
SELECT FILL PERCENT PASSING ; . ; ssa ‘ . - ieee
15. BACKFILL AND FINISH GRADING: CAREFULLY PLACE BACKFILL OVER THE LEACHING SYSTEM, A TOTAL SIEVE SIZE“ WET SIEVE _DRY SIEVE " : "1 4250 GALLON OUTLETS.
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES OF WELL GRADED SANDY FILL (CLEAN, POROUS, AND DEVOID OF ROCKS) # 100 100 - 0 AW |
AS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE FILTER FABRIC OVER THE DISTRIBUTION PIPE. FINISHED GRADE #10 70-100 70-100 REGULAR
MUST DIVERT SURFACE RUNOFF FROM THE SOIL TREATMENT AREA AND PREVENT SURFACE PONDING #40 10-508 10-75 ; . ten me’ ;
PER THE PROPOSED CONTOUR LINES AND SPOT GRADES PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN. PROTECT THE 0-20 9 9 SEPTIC TANK
SYSTEM AREA FROM EROSION BY LOAMING AND SEEDING OR BY USING OTHER APPROVED METHODS #100 = 0-5 . _
OF EROSION CONTROL. #200 0-5 0-2.5 8 3’ Sale DERSH SPEROEKRON
EE ee ee ee en ie ee *PERCENT PASSING THE #40 SIEVE CAN BE INCREASED TO NO GREATER THAN 75% IF THE PERCENT PASSING THE #100 AST DESIGNATION €1227
GEOMATRIX GST 62 SERIES DESIGN AND INSTALLATION MANUAL. SIEVE DOES NOT EXCEED'10% AND THE #200 SIEVE DOES NOT EXCEED 5% IF THE FILL FAILS THE DRY SIEVE BUT NOTES:
17, THE FILL OVER THE SEPTIC TANK SHALL NOT EXCEED 12 INCHES WITHOUT THE INSTALLATION OF FE WET SIEVE, THEN THE FILL SHALL BE APPROVED. OT TO SC 4, JOINT SEACANT 1S BUTYL RUBSER
PASSES TH i SCA
PRECAST CONCRETE RISERS ABOVE THE MANHOLES. IF RISERS ARE INSTALLED, THE ORIGINAL COVERS
WaASHC TOE SEAL THAT CORFORMS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL
ON THE SEPTIC TANK SHALL REMAIN. C33 SAND _- PERCENT cin math
18, A CLEAN OUT SHALL BE INSTALLED JUST INSIDE THE FOUNDATION WALL ON THE BUILDING SEWER PIPE SIEVE SIZE PASSING | SPECICATION $$-$~0021(210-A),
FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES. 0.375" 100 cE 2. PPE INLET AND OUTLET LOCATIONS
# ee NOTES: 8 pe Ss nowronene stem. peroruen SOMN , EXISTING
#8 80.0—100.0 1. TOPSOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED WITHIN THE LEACHING AREA AND EXTEND A t i } CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM = PAVEMENT
#16 50.0-85.0 MINIMUM OF 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS BEYOND THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE i a MERPORCIGT EEE, WRLDED GRE - ke Fy
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: #0 ayy LEACHING SYSTEM. = t FABRE: CONFORM TO LATEST AST I —— - ZZMOUNTABLE BERM
el a0 2. COMMON/NATIVE CLEAN FILL SHALL BE USED TO FILL THE REMAINING AREAS 7 gg i eae ee FA PROFILE (OPTIONAL)
1. SURVEYOR TO MARK LIMITS OF CLEARING AND THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE. 9200 5 - - SUMO INATVE CLEAN FLL SHALL a ee = eee a AL SIREN $000 Pee AT 28 Oar,
as
2. INSTALL SILT FENCE AS INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN AND PER EROSION AND SEDIMENT NOTE: ASTM C33 SELECT SAND SHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY MATERIAL LARGER THAN THE THREE (3) INCH . iH & METHOD OF NAN 50°MIN. _
CONTROL PLAN SIEVE. UP TO 45% OF THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE MAY BE RETAINED ON THE #4 DIREGTIONS, BEYOND THE OUTER PERIMETER DP JHE LEACHING SYSTEM. L 7, SECTIONS ARE MOHOLTOC. z
" SIEVE. THE MATERIAL THAT PASSES THE #4 SIEVE IS THEN REWEIGHED AND THE SIEVE ANALYSIS tl ~onnieneaniin EXISTING 2
3, INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AS INDICATEDION THE SITE PLAN AND PER EROSION AND STARTED.
TOP VEW Poles | S
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. NO, 6 STONE AGGREGATE lilac bi 4 wai: EXISTING
4, DEMOLISH EXISTING GARAGE. = PERCENT ACCC (EY een) en N 7] PAVEMENT
5. SURVEYOR TO MARK LIMITS OF FOUNDATION FOR PROPOSED GARAGE AND ADDITION. 2" N/A GEOMATRIX GST TMLEACHING SYSTEM ae i aniiniasesll Tes oa SAP
6. EXCAVATE FOR AND CONSTRUCT FOUNDATION FOR PROPOSED GARAGE AND ADDITION. 1.5 N/A ; Plan | ; al = ae FS
7. EXCAVATE FOR AND INSTALL UTILITY SERVICE TO THE PROPOSED GARAGE. 3 0-40 ene : eer =
” = 4 : x goa" i
8. CONSTRUCT PROPOSED GARAGE AND ADDITION, 1/2" 20-55 : CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
9. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING WITHIN THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE. hy 0-15 cr F :
: oo 1. STONE SIZE — USE 1—4 INCH STONE, OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE
eid eaucppicnicliniahamms cas NOTE: STONE AGGREGATE MUST BE OF UNFORM CONSISTENCY AND ONLY CONTAIN CLEAN, HARD, TOUGH, DURAB!E 4 Yea ‘ | EQUIVALENT.
11. INSTALL DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREAS. FRAGMENTS THAT MEET THE SPECIFICATIONS CITED | 4 : _
FOR RESEEDING TECHNICAL STANDARDS, WHICH INCLUDES A FINES STANDARD OF A MAXIMUM OF 1% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE AT THE 25” jb eee eet 2. LENGTH WINOT LESS THAN 50, FEET, EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE A
12. TOPSOIL OF EXPOSED SOILS TO PREPARE FOR RESEEDING. PIT/QUARRY SOURCE. THIS STANDARD SHOULD ALSO BE MET AT THE SSDS INSTALLATION SITE; HOWEVER IN NO CASE *" spe VIEW :
13, RESEED ALL EXPOSED AREAS PER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. COVER WITH SHALL THE FINES EXCEED 1.5% CT DOT #6 3. THICKNESS — NOT LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES.
stone 4. WIDTH — TWELVE (12) FOOT MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT
ones IN PLACE UNTIL ALL UP-GRADIENT AREAS ARE PERMANENTLY ) ENTRANCE TO fgiets PB HERES SOI TRENT FOUR AA) HOG te INGLE
Tas SIRT FERES TOREMARS ; : a Fae UNITED CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC,
ESTABLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE TOWN OF WATERFORD.
4” SDR 35h ees conden Ste qh BO HES PA. (2019) 25S—a08 5. GEOTEXTILE — WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE.
12’Distribution Se YRESMLLE, CT 06492 (203) 269-3119 6. SURFACE WATER — ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CON-
Pipe Sl ASTM C—33 a . STRUCTION ACCESS SHALL BE PIPED BENEATH THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS
Say = fe May vuseare IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED.
ey a ait 7. MAINTENANCE — THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL
3 1. SEE ELEVATION SCHEDULE FOR SEPTIC TANK INSTALLATION ELEVATIONS. MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
—
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN: = A’ 2. SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. a SRN STING, IS REQUIRED. pa FE one AapheA gee WITH STONE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND INSTALLED PER THE 2002 9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH
CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.
4. ESTIMATED DURATION OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES — 90 DAYS
2. SURVEYOR TO MARK WETLAND SETBACK LIMITS ON THE PROPERTY AS APPLICABLE.
3. SILT FENCE IS TO BE INSTALLED, AS INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND INSPECTED BY TOWN STAFF. A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE
SHALL BE GIVEN FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SILT FENCE. DETAIL
4. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE INSTALLED, AS INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY wis
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
;
5. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS INDICATED IN THE GEOMATRIX GST “LEACHING SYSTEM ee —
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ON THE SITE PLAN. B-B’ CROSS SECTION FLTER FABRIC MATERIAL ee Sam Sor
6. STOCKPILE AREAS MUST BE DIRECTLY CONTAINED WITHIN SILT FENCE AROUND THE COMPLETE Finished Grade shall be pitched to sheet
PERIMETER. flow stormwater away from system :
7. EXCESS SPOILS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE AT AN APPROPRIATELY LICENSED FACILITY.
VRVARV AVA
8. ALL REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. Cover material depth shall be >6” ‘ —s)
GS Pl ag tp dpc wager tps thtoice Roark)
IF DURING THE PLANTING SEASON, RECOMMENDED SEEDING DATES SHALL BE BETWEEN APRIL and shall be uniform over system I RERLEL xo vos RA SAS: a
15 AND SEPTEMBER 15. SEED MIX WILL CONSIST OF 0.45 LB PER 1,000 S.F. OF CREEPING RED OR STW (253 Sand , WSS
TALL FESCUE, 0.05 LB PER'1,000 S.F. OF REDTOP AND 0.20 LB PER 1,000 S.F. OF BIRD’S FOOT te-mmeval wsiiend ter Fobri istribution Pipe i SIDE_VIEW
TREFOIL WITH INNOCULENT. FERTILIZER MAY BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 7.5 LB PER 1,000 S.F.
CT DOT No. 6
OF 10-10-10. ee aaa
9, SILT FENCE BARRIER TO BE MAINTAINED AND LEFT IN PLACE UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE
—
ESTABLISHED VEGETATION TO THE SATISFACTION OF TOWN STAFF.
now RE
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAILY INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SILT
FENCE AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CONDITIONS ONSITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. mi
11. PROJECT ENGINEER MAY BE CALLED FOR SPECIAL INSPECTIONS TO ASSESS EROSION AND >2” f
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN EFFECTIVENESS AND MAKE REVISIONS AS NECESSARY. | —_
12. PROJECT ENGINEER MAY ALSO BE CALLED IN TO ASSESS EMERGENCY SITUATIONS (I.E. SEVERE LENGTH OF S | TE | M P R O VE M E N T S U, R VE Y
FLOODING, RAINS OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS). GEOMATRIX GST “LEACHING SYSTEM sore
A-A’ CROSS SECTION INTERLOCKED eepeey ine LAND BELONGING TO:
W/ATTACHED FABRIC R O B E R
ANGLE ENDS OF FILTER FABRIC FENCE
PLAN VIEW T, JR. & GRACE KYNE
Finished Grade shall be pitched to sheet eS ees ete a
flow stormwater away from Say yy 18 DIMMOCK ROAD
NV /
ond shall be uniform a syetem gy ren WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
505 Bae SCALE: 1"= 20'
me REVISIONS: MARCH 13, 2020
SCT DOT No. 6 MAY 28, 2020
stone PLAN REVISED THROUGH: MAY 5, 2021
(or approved equivilant)
Sheet 2 of 2