Zoning Board of Appeals
agenda center agenda
| Board/Commission | Zoning Board of Appeals |
|---|---|
| Meeting Date | November 01, 2023 |
| Pages | 31 |
| File Size | 7.9 MB |
| OCR Status | Searchable (OCR processed) |
| Source URL | Original |
Document Preview
Full Text (OCR Extracted)
Florek Surveying, LLC 239 Shore Road Waterford, CT 06385 860.271.6006 bflorek@floreksurveyingllc.com 8 Point Comfort Hardship The existing home at 8 Point Comfort is located at the top of a steep slope down to the Niantic River. The proposed home is sited away from the top of slope but it encroaches into the front yard setback. A front yard variance is being requested. Note the front yard setbacks of existing homes on Point Comfort as shown on the plan. The front yard setback fits the character of the neighborhood. Location 8 POINT COMFORT Mblu 102/ / 6297/ / Acct# 00584200 Owner ANGEL EYES CONSTRUCTION LLC Assessment $477,420 Appraisal $682,030 PID 6297 Building Count 2 8 POINT COMFORT Current Value Appraisal Valuation Year Improvements Land Total 2022 $144,030 $538,000 $682,030 Assessment Valuation Year Improvements Land Total 2022 $100,820 $376,600 $477,420 Parcel Addreses Additional Addresses Address City, State Zip Type Owner ANGEL EYES CONSTRUCTION LLC Co-Owner Sale Price $649,900 Certificate Book & Page 1829/57 Sale Date 07/28/2023 Instrument 00 Year Built: 1924 Living Area: 1,170 Replacement Cost: $170,034 Building Percent Good: 64 Building Attributes Field Description Style Conventional 8 POINT COMFORT Secondary Owner of Record Ownership History Ownership History Owner Sale Price Certificate Book & Page Instrument Sale Date ANGEL EYES CONSTRUCTION LLC $649,900 1829/57 00 07/28/2023 BISPHAM HARRISON A IV $420,000 1633/0286 UNKQ 02/21/2020 SHAY EDWARD A JR & JUDITH M $0 0245/0979 00 08/07/1978 Building Information Building 1 : Section 1 Model Residential Grade: C Stories 1.75 Occupancy 1 Exterior Wall 1 Cedar/Redwood Exterior Wall 2 Roof Structure Gable Roof Cover Arch Shingles Interior Wall 1 Panel Interior Wall 2 Interior Flr 1 Hardwood Interior Flr 2 Ceramic Tile Heat Fuel Oil Heat Type: Steam AC % 0 Total Bedrooms: 2 Full Bthrms: 1 Half Baths: 1 Extra Fixtures 1 Total Rooms: 5 Bath Style: Modern Kitchen Style: Modern Num Kitchens 1 Fireplace(s) 1 Extra Opening(s) 0 Legend Building Photo (https://images.vgsi.com/photos/WaterfordCTPhotos//\00\01\21\94.JPG) Building Layout (https://images.vgsi.com/photos/WaterfordCTPhotos//Sketches/6297_6297 Building Sub-Areas (sq ft) Gas Fireplace(s) 0 % Attic Fin 0 LF Dormer 12 Foundation Piers Bsmt Gar(s) 0 Bsmt % 0 SF FBM 0.00 SF Rec Rm 0 Fin Bsmt Qual Bsmt Access Hatchway Code Description Gross Area Living Area BAS First Floor 720 720 TQS Three Quarter Story 600 450 CRL Crawl Space 600 0 WDK Deck 268 0 2,188 1,170 Year Built: 1955 Living Area: 391 Replacement Cost: $53,349 Building Percent Good: 66 Building Attributes : Bldg 2 of 2 Field Description Style Apt/Garage Model Residential Grade: D Stories 1 Occupancy 1 Exterior Wall 1 Vinyl Siding Exterior Wall 2 Building Photo (https://images.vgsi.com/photos/WaterfordCTPhotos//default.jpg) Building 2 : Section 1 Roof Structure Gable Roof Cover Arch Shingles Interior Wall 1 Panel Interior Wall 2 Interior Flr 1 Carpet Interior Flr 2 Heat Fuel Electric Heat Type: Elec Baseboard AC % 0 Total Bedrooms: 1 Full Bthrms: 1 Half Baths: 0 Extra Fixtures 0 Total Rooms: 3 Bath Style: Average Kitchen Style: Average Num Kitchens 1 Fireplace(s) 0 Extra Opening(s) 0 Gas Fireplace(s) 0 % Attic Fin 0 LF Dormer 0 Foundation Piers Bsmt Gar(s) 0 Bsmt % 0 Legend Building Layout (https://images.vgsi.com/photos/WaterfordCTPhotos//Sketches/6297_2022 Building Sub-Areas (sq ft) Code Description Gross Area Living Area BAS First Floor 391 391 FGR Garage 460 0 PRS Piers 391 0 WDK Deck 80 0 1,322 391 SF FBM 0.00 SF Rec Rm 0 Fin Bsmt Qual Bsmt Access None Legend Land Use Use Code 101 Description Res Dwelling Zone R-20W Neighborhood 500W Alt Land Appr No Category Land Line Valuation Size (Acres) 0.33 Frontage 100 Depth 0 Assessed Value $376,600 Appraised Value $538,000 Legend Extra Features Extra Features No Data for Extra Features Land Outbuildings Outbuildings No Data for Outbuildings (c) 2023 Vision Government Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Valuation History Appraisal Valuation Year Improvements Land Total 2022 $133,960 $538,000 $671,960 2021 $110,460 $355,510 $465,970 Assessment Valuation Year Improvements Land Total 2022 $93,780 $376,600 $470,380 2021 $77,330 $248,860 $326,190 portal.ct.gov/DEEP Land and Water Resources Division COASTAL SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS CHECKLIST This checklist is used by the Land and Water Resources Division (LWRD) to assess the consistency of the proposed activities with the relevant policies and standards of the Connecticut Coastal Management Act [(CCMA), Connecticut General Statutes (CGS) sections 22a-90 through 22a-112, inclusive]. ORIGINAL TO: Wayne Scott, Zoning Official Waterford Planning Department COASTAL SITE PLAN REVIEW TRIGGER: Zoning Compliance Subdivision Special Exception or Permit Variance Municipal Improvement Date sent/delivered 10/17/23 by (indicate all that apply): hand fax e-mail U.S. mail PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to demolish the existing home and detached garage and build a 2.5 story single family home set back from the slope’s edge in the Unshaded Zone X portion of the property. Applicant is currently requesting a variance from the front setback minimum requirement. APPLICANT NAME: Todd Pazzolesi MAILING ADDRESS: 49 Cross Road, Waterford, CT PROJECT ADDRESS: 8 Point Comfort Road Coastal Site Plan Review Comment Checklist Page 2 * General Coastal Resources and General Development policies are applicable to all proposed activities. ** Policies that are not applicable are not checked in this chart. LWRD reviewer KAM Date plans were received by LWRD: received on 10/4/23; Date Comments are Due: 11/1/23 Date LWRD review completed: 10/17/23 Most recent revision date on plans: 10/1/23 Plan title: Property Survey COASTAL RESOURCES AND RESOURCE POLICIES: ON-SITE ADJACENT TO SITE POTENTIALLY INCONSISTENT NOT APPLICABLE General Coastal Resources* Beaches and Dunes Bluffs and Escarpments Coastal Hazard Area Coastal Waters and/or Estuarine Embayments Developed Shorefront Freshwater Wetlands and Watercourses Intertidal Flats Islands Rocky Shorefront Shellfish Concentration Areas Shorelands Tidal Wetlands Coastal Site Plan Review Comment Checklist Page 3 ADVERSE IMPACTS ON COASTAL RESOURCES: Appears Acceptable Potentially Unacceptable Not Applicable Degrades tidal wetland, beaches and dunes, rocky shorefronts, or bluffs and escarpments Degrades existing circulation patterns of coastal waters Increases coastal flooding hazard by altering shoreline or bathymetry Degrades natural or existing drainage patterns Degrades natural shoreline erosion and accretion patterns Degrades or destroys wildlife, finfish, or shellfish habitat Degrades water quality Degrades visual quality COASTAL USE POLICIES:** Applies Potentially Inconsistent General Development* Boating Coastal Recreation and Access Coastal Structures and Filling Cultural Resources Fisheries Fuels, Chemicals, or Hazardous Materials Ports and Harbors Sewer and Water Lines Solid Waste Transportation Water- dependent Uses Coastal Site Plan Review Comment Checklist Page 4 ADVERSE IMPACTS ON FUTURE WATER-DEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AND OPPORTUNITIES: Appears Acceptable Potentially Unacceptable Not Applicable Replaces an existing water-dependent use with a non-water-dependent use Reduces existing public access Locates a non-water-dependent use at a site that is physically suited for a water-dependent use for which there is a reasonable demand Locates a non-water-dependent use at a site that has been identified for a water-dependent use in the plan of development or zoning regulations ISSUES OF CONCERN (SEE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS BOX FOR ADDITIONAL DETAIL): No Concerns Noted Insufficient information Potential increased risk to life and property in coastal hazard area Adverse impacts on future water-dependent development opportunities Proximity of disturbance to sensitive resources/need for additional vegetated setback Potential to cause erosion/sedimentation; need for adequate sedimentation and erosion control measures Water quality and/or stormwater impact Other coastal resource impacts: Other: Analysis and Recommendations Section: Analysis: Applicant proposes to demolish the existing home and detached garage and build a 2.5 story single family home set back from the slope’s edge in the Unshaded Zone X portion of the property. Applicant is currently requesting a variance from the front setback minimum requirement. Comments/Recommendations: 1. DEEP has no specific comments with respect to the proposed project at this time. In general, DEEP supports variances from the front setback if they allow for increased setbacks from sensitive resources such as tidal wetlands and steep slopes. Coastal Site Plan Review Comment Checklist Page 5 cspr review checklist.doc revised March 2021 FINDING: (Please see summary and recommendations section on page 4 for discussion) CONSISTENT WITH ALL APPLICABLE COASTAL POLICIES, COMMENTS INCLUDED CONSISTENT WITH MODIFICATIONS OR CONDITIONS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED PRIOR TO COMPLETE CSPR EVALUATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED TO THIS CHECKLIST: Copies of photographs of the site dated: Copies of aerial photographs dated: GIS maps depicting: Coastal resources maps dated: Coastal Management Fact Sheet(s): Other: FEMA Firmette attached Please be advised that, separate from the municipal review, the following DEEP permits may be required: Structures, Dredging, and Fill in Tidal Coastal or Navigable Waters Tidal Wetlands Stormwater General Permit: Other: Please direct questions or comments regarding this checklist to: Karen Michaels, EA III Planning Section, Land and Water Resources Division CT DEEP Karen.Michaels@ct.gov copy/ies provided to LWRD Reviewer Initials: KAM Date: 10/17/23 This checklist is intended to replace a comment letter only in those instances where LWRD comments can be readily conveyed without the background discussion that would be provided in a letter. This checklist is not used for projects that LWRD recommends should be denied. Coastal Site Plan Review Comment Checklist Page 6 cspr review checklist.doc revised March 2021